HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA BACKUP 04-02-92
~ Centra~ ~ontra Costa Sanitary Jistrict
~a~"1k BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 3
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
April 2, 1992
NO.
SUBA"PPROVE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF
WALNUT CREEK FOR THE SEWER REPLACEMENT
PROJECT IN OVERLOOK DRIVE, WALNUT CREEK,
D.P. 4871
3. CONSENT CALENDAR a.
~arch 24, 1992
TYPE OF ACTION
APPROVE
AGREEMENT
SUBMITTED BY
Dennis Hall, Associate Engineer
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Engineering Dept.llnfrastructure Division
ISSUE: Board authorization is required for agreements with other public agencies.
BACKGROUND: The city of Walnut Creek is in the process of developing plans for the
reconstruction of the roadway on Overlook Drive to mitigate minor ground failure in the public
right of way. Preliminary plans call for excavating the downhill half of the roadway to a depth of
4 feet, placing engineered fill, and repaving for a distance of approximately 1,000 feet.
Currently this road alignment contains a 6-inch vitrified clay sewer which was installed in 1950
and varies from 5 to 12 feet in depth. TV reports and maintenance records indicate that the
sewer segment contains numerous structural cracks and low spots and will require replacement
in the near future. Because of the current condition and age of this sewer and the strong
likelihood that the road reconstruction will further adversely impact the sewer's deteriorated
condition, staff recommends that the sewer be replaced in conjunction with the city's work.
The proposed replacement project will include approximately 1,300 lineal feet of 8-inch sewer and
two manholes. Approximately 300 feet of the sewer replacement work is outside the limits of
the roadway reconstruction. This sewer segment is also deteriorated and is in need of
replacement. Please see Exhibit "A" for the project's location.
The city of Walnut Creek has been notified of the current condition of the sewer and has agreed
to incorporate our sewer replacement design into the city's plans and specifications for the road
reconstruction. The District staff has negotiated a sewer replacement agreement with the city.
The negotiated agreement outlines the responsibilities and requirements of the city and the District
to accomplish design and construction of the sewer replacement. The agreement provides for the
District's design and inspection of the sewer, and reimbursement to the city of construction and
other incidental costs associated with the sewer installation only. The District will pay the actual
costs of the sewer work based on a contractor's bid. The preliminary engineer's estimate for the
sewer replacement work is $162,000. This cooperative arrangement will provide for significant
cost savings to the District and, at the same time, foster good working relationships with city
staff. The Walnut Creek City Council approved the agreement on March 17, 1992.
Staff has determined that this project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEOA) under District CEOA Guidelines, Section 18.2, since it involves a minor alteration to an
existing sewer facility with negligible expansion of capacity. Board of Director's approval of this
project will constitute a finding of agreement with this determination unless otherwise indicated.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
AJI(
PtJf5
INITIA TING DEPT./DIV.
1302A-9/85
DH
JSM
RAB
------- .--.--.--.-..-----..-.----...-....--..------...-.-...--.-----,...
SUBJECT
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...,.......................................................................
!:IIIIII'=III:llllll!:
APPROVE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF
WALNUT CREEK FOR THE SEWER RELOCATION
PROJECT IN OVERLOOK DRIVE, WALNUT CREEK
D.P. 4871
2
OF
3
PAGE
DATE
March 24, 1992
RECOMMENDATION: Approve an agreement with the city of Walnut Creek, authorize the
President of the Board of Directors and the Secretary of the District to execute the agreement,
and authorize recording of the agreement.
13028-7/91
._~--,.,..,-~_._._-,-"._,---_...,.._..__.__.__._-_....~'-""'--'-'-----'--r---
) \
PROJECT LOCATION
OVERLOOK DR
REMOVE & REPLACE~
REPLACE EXISTING 6" SEWER ~O
SECTION A - A
Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District
.
OVERLOOK DRIVE
EXHIBIT
SEWER REPLACEMENT
"A"
2523-1/87
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1
OF 4
BOARD MEETING OF
April 2, 1992
NO.
5. PERSONNEL a.
SUBJECT
DATE
March 25, 1992
TYPE OF ACTION
AUTHORIZATION TO HIRE SEASONAL EMPLOYEES
PERSONNEL
SUBMITTED BY
Darlene Ross, Acting Personnel Officer
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Administrative
ISSUE: District staff has assessed its needs for seasonal help in 1992.
BACKGROUND: Each year the District hires students during the summer months for
vacation relief, cleanup, and special projects; and during the school year or semester
breaks for additional assistance. Authorization was given for forty-one student positions
last year. Approval is requested for forty seasonal positions in Fiscal Year 1992 - 1993.
A summary of the requests at the Board Meeting for seasonal employees is attached.
Department Managers will be prepared to answer any questions regarding their requests.
It is recommended that the hourly rate for seasonal employees remain the same as the
last two years:
Student Positions
ProDosed Salarv*
Clerical, Laborer (No experience
necessary)
$7.50
Technical (Drafting)
$9.00
Professional (Chemist,
Engineer)
$1 0.00
*For every year a student returns, add $1.00 per hour to a maximum of three additional
summers. For example, a student laborer who has worked here for the past two summers
would receive $9.50 per hour this summer. The extra dollar would recognize experience
and serve as an incentive for returning students.
The approximate cost of this action will be $369,177 from departmental 0 & M budgets.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
GR1~G.
ROGER J. DOLAN
1302A-7/91
.. -----------.------- .--------.---....,----
SUBJECT
POSITION PAPER
AUTHORIZATION TO HIRE SEASONAL EMPLOYEES
PAGE
DATE
2
OF lIr
March 25, 1992
The details for the Departmental requests follow:
Administrative
The Administrative Department is requesting three summer students in 1992-1993, two
less students than 1991-1992. The Central Services and Management Section is
planning to have a single student perform laborer duties and split time assisting in
materials control and in building maintenance for the Headquarters Office Building. The
Secretarial Section has requested one student for vacation coverage and general clerical
assistance. This is a reduction of one student from 1991-1992. The Personnel and
Public Information/Graphics Section proposes to share one student again this year.
Collection System Ooerations
The C.S.O. Department is requesting one additional summer student for 1991-1992, in
place of a co-op student for six months. The department plans to continue using a
current co-op student for the summer only. Their request totals twelve laborers, three
clericals, one technical assistant, and two engineering assistants.
Plant Ooerations
The Plant Operations Department is requesting one additional student for 1992-1993.
This additional position will be an engineering student assigned to the Operations Section
to perform video editing of training tapes.
Eight laborers are again requested; six to assist the Building and Grounds Section and two
to be assigned to the Pumping Stations. Two chemistry students are requested in the
Laboratory. In the Maintenance Section, one electrical engineering student is requested
to assist with ongoing projects, one student will be a drafter to do shop drawings, and
one student will assist the Safety Specialist.
1302B-7/91
SUBJECT
POSITION PAPER
AUTHORIZATION TO HIRE SEASONAL EMPLOYEES
PAGE
DATE
3
OF 4
March 25, 1992
Enaineerina
The Engineering Department is requesting one less seasonal employee from 1991-1992.
The Plant Engineering Division has reduced their request from three to two summer
students. That Division is requesting one drafter to assist in the Engineering Support
Group performing mapping and drafting duties. The second student requested by the
Plant Engineering Division is to perform clerical duties and be shared by the Engineering
Support Group and the Survey Section. This clerical person will be assigned to perform
basic data entry updates on spreadsheet and database software and backup of computer
systems.
The Planning Division requests two engineering students to work on Water Reclamation,
treatment plant programs, collection system studies, and pretreatment.
The Secretary of the District
The Secretary of the District again requests one student to assist in tasks related to the
records management program and provide vacation relief.
The attachment, which follows, provides a summary of the Departmental requests for
students.
The Board Personnel Committee has reviewed this request at their meeting of March 24,
1992.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the hiring of 40)( persons for seasonal employment.
1302B-7/91
U)
"CroC:
J:: 0').2 LO
.... O').~
~roU)
e:( i.
U)
NC
0').2 M
en.~
roU)
o
Q.
ro
en
I-
Z
w
C
::::;)
I-
en
a:
o
LL.
Men
0')1-
0') en
row
.::::;)
Nd
O')w
0') a:
ro....
e:(
I-
Z
w
:!
I-
a:
e:(
Q.
W
C
I-
Z
w
:!
::E:
(.)
e:(
l-
I-
e:(
o
o
ro
ro
~
o
in
o
ro
~
o
C!
o
ro
~
o
in
en
~
o
C!
0')
~
o
in
CO
~
..... .q- LO
,.....
.....
00
.....
N .q- N
.....
,..... N
..... .....
M
.....
.q-
.....
.....
LO
.q-
.....
.....
.....
.q-
.....
o
.q-
00
.....
.....
.....
o
.....
M
o
.....
~ N M .......... ,.....
,.....
~
....
C
Q)
E
1::
CO
c.
Q)
C
Q)
>
'+:i
CO
~
....
,~
c:
E
"C
<(
o
CJ)
U
U)
c:
o
'+:i
CO
~
Q)
c.
o
....
c:
CO
a..
0)
c:
';:
Q)
Q)
C
0)
C
W
....
u
';:
....
U)
C
Q)
..c
....
-
o
>
~
CO
....
Q)
~
u
Q)
CJ)
CO
....
o
I-
I-
J:
U
ex:
UJ
~
:)
(/)
c:l
Cl
aJ
~
Q.
en
a:
~
....
u
';:
....
U)
C
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF
3
BOARD MEETING OF
April 2, 1 992
NO.
5. PERSONNEL b.
SUBJECT
DATE
March 25, 1992
RECEIVE AND CONSIDER PERSONNEL BUDGET REQUESTS
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992 - 1993
TYPE OF ACTION
RECEIVE BUDGET
SUBMITTED BY
Darlene Ross, Acting Personnel Officer
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Ad m inistrative/Personnel
ISSUE: Staff has analyzed its personnel needs for Fiscal Year 1992-1993 and is submitting
its requests for Board consideration at the April 2, 1992 Board Meeting. Board approval is
scheduled for the April 16, 1992 Board Meeting.
BACKGROUND: Each department has reviewed its staffing requirements for Fiscal Year 1992-
1 993. The Personnel Budget includes an executive summary of proposed modifications to
each department, a departmental overview providing summary information, request
justification pages with detailed explanations on the effect of these recommended staffing
changes, organizational charts reflecting current staffing and proposed changes, and job
classifications for proposed positions.
The attached summary sheet highlights each department's staffing requests, their effect on
the number of total authorized positions in the District, and the additional cost in salaries,
benefits, and sewer service charge. As shown in the summary, the total number of authorized
regular positions in the District would remain identical to last year. The requested changes
in personnel positions result in a net decrease in the budget for Fiscal Year 1992-1993. Also,
the Collection System Operations Department is requesting one less Co-op position from last
year. The total Co-op positions would decrease to ten (10).
Despite the decreased number of positions, the salaries and wages in the 1992-93 0 & M
Departmental Budgets will increase from the previous year due to the following:
. Any cost-of-living salary adjustments resulting from the negotiated Memoranda of
Understanding;
. Merit and longevity increases scheduled in 1992-93;
. Filling authorized positions which were vacant in 1991-1992;
. Positions authorized in 1 991-1 992 which were budgeted for a partial year because
of the time required to fill positions.
On Tuesday, March 24, 1992, the Personnel Committee met to review the proposed budget.
The following Board authorizations and modifications to the District staffing charts were
discussed at that meeting. Copies of the Personnel Budget will be distributed for the meeting
of April 2, 1992, at which time an overview will be presented by the staff.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
1302A-7/91
. _____.__..__~._..__..~-.'"-.~-'-...-.--------..-'--...~~_..~____.____..._""_______._.._._.._,.,._~..._~M.".._.___._________
SUBJECT
POSITION PAPER
RECEIVE AND CONSIDER PERSONNEL BUDGET REQUESTS
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992 - 1993
PAGE 2
DATE
OF
3
March 25, 1992
The details for the Departmental requests follow:
District-Wide
1. Change title of Junior Engineer to Staff Engineer, G-67, $3273 - $3961, with no change
in class description or salary level.
Administrative
2. Reinstate an Accounting Technician III, G-56, $2521 - $3048, to provide advancement
opportunity to Accounting Technician II, G-52, $2292 - $2769, with no increase in staff
positions.
Plant ODerations
No personnel request.
Enaineering
3. Add one Engineering Assistant, G-69, $3434 - $4152, and approve updated class
description.
4. Delete one Senior Survey Technician, G-68, $3318 - $4017. Add one Engineering
Assistant, G-69, $3434 - $4152. Reclassify James Ruetenik to the position of
Engineering Assistant.
5. Delete one Construction Inspector, G-67, $3273 - $3961.
6. Add one Systems Analyst, G-67, $3273 - $3961, and adopt new class description.
7. Delete one Associate Engineer, S-77, $4210 - $5100.
8. Delete one Associate Engineer, S-77, $4210 - $5100. Add one Source Control Program
Superintendent, S-77, $4210 - $5100, and adopt new class description. Reclassify Bart
Brandenburg to the position of Source Control Program Superintendent.
C.S.O.
No personnel request.
1302B-7/91
. .._._._-----"-----_._---_.._._,._--'-._._'---_.._~._---------,----...-...-------.----.----.------.--..-..---
SUBJECT
POSITION PAPER
RECEIVE AND CONSIDER PERSONNEL BUDGET REQUESTS
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992 - 1993
PAGE 3
DATE
OF
3
March 25, 1992
Secretary of the District
No personnel request.
CO-OD
9. Authorize the hiring of students to fill 10 positions in the Co-op Program.
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and consider the Personnel Budget for 1992 - 1993 herein
identified by items 1 - 9. The budget will be submitted for final approval at the April 16, 1992
Board Meeting.
1302B-7/91
.....--.--------.-.--,.---....-..-----.-----t"-..-.--.---,~.....-_.--------.-_._.,_.-"-_.-.---,---------
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1
OF 5
BOARD MEETING OF
NO.
April 2, 1 992
5. PERSONNEL c.
SUBJECT
DATE
ADOPT DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE POLICY AND
PROCEDURES AS REQUIRED BY GOVERMENT CODE
SECTION 8350, ET SEQ.
March 24 1992
TYPE OF ACTION
ADOPT POLICY
SUBMITTED BY
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Paul Morsen, Deputy General Manager
Ad m inistrative/Personnel
ISSUE: In order to participate in Federal and State grant programs, it is required that the District
adopt a Drug-Free Workplace Policy.
BACKGROUND: In order to obtain contracts and/or grant monies from the Federal Government
or the State of California, it is required that the District adopt and publish a statement notifying
employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled
substance at the workplace is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees for
violations, as required by Government Code Section 8355(a). The State also requires the
establishment of a Drug-Free Awareness Program as required by Government Code Section
8355(b), to inform employees about all of the following:
(a) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace,
(b) The organization's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace,
(c) Any available counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance programs, and
(d) Penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations.
The final requirement of the State is that the District provide as required by Government Code
Section 8355(c), that every employee who works on the proposed contract or grant:
(a) Will receive a copy of the company's drug-free policy statement, and
(b) Will agree to abide by the terms of the company's statement as a condition of employment
on the contract or grant.
The proposed policy and procedures to satisfy the State's requirements is attached.
The District has addressed substance abuse in its current Memorandums of Understanding with
both the Management Support/Confidential Group and the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Employees' Association Public Employees, Local No.1 that provide for counseling and treatment
of an employee who is experiencing a drug dependency problem. In addition, both units have
committed themselves to supporting a drug-free workplace by signing side letters to the
Memorandums of Understanding adopted in 1991. The District offers an Employee Assistance
Program to all full-time employees that provides counseling and treatment for substance abuse.
The District's Disciplinary Policy and Procedures delineate actions that may be taken against a
District employee for continued substance abuse.
If adopted by the Board this policy will be distributed to all employees.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
.ICHIEF ENG.
~
.'--.-"---.-.,.,-,.-.,'-------.------.-....-"~----.-.'--.-r----"--.--~_._-'---------.--.---~~.,.._._---*.--.,-----.-.-,.----,--.------.--..--,--"-~-.-
SUBJECT
POSITION. PAPER
ADOPT DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE POLICY AND
PROCEDURES
PAGE
DATE
2
OF 5
March 24, 1992
Currently the State is administering a Federal grant in the amount of $113,000 for the Source
Control Section of the Engineering Department to conduct a residential metals study. Also, the
Laboratory Section of the Plant Operations Department has contracted with the State Department
of Fish and Game to perform toxicity testing of mussels. The State is requiring a Drug-Free
Workplace Policy to proceed with both items.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Drug-Free Workplace Policy and Procedures as proposed.
1302B-7/91
-,---------"._------,.--"--_._._'_._------_._--_..._.__._..~----.--...---.------..-,--'-.-..-,-.
~ Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
No.
Personnel procedure
Effective
04/02/92
Subject
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE POLICY AND PROCEDURES
---- -~----
Established by:
Paul Morsen, Deputy General Manager
PURPOSE
This policy is adopted in compliance with the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (Title V,
Subtitle D of Public Law 100-690) and the California Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990
(Government Code Sections 8350, et seq.). It augments, but does not replace current
District policy regarding drug and alcohol use and abuse by District employees.
It is the intent of this policy to eliminate substance abuse and its effect in the workplace.
It is the District's duty to ensure that employees are in a condition to perform their duties
safely and efficiently, in the interests of their fellow workers and the public as well as
themselves. The presence of controlled substances on the job, other than those which
are prescribed by a physician, and the influence of these substances on employees during
working hours, or at the worksite (including parking lots, exercise facilities, or off-site
work areas such as where an employee is representing the District on a customer call or
at a business meeting) are inconsistent with this objective.
In recognition of the public service responsibilities entrusted to the employees of Central
Contra Costa Sanitary District, and that drug abuse can hinder one's -ability to perform
duties safely and effectively, the following policy is adopted by the District, consistent
with the federal Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 and the California Drug-Free Workplace
Act of 1990.
POLICY
The Central Contra Costa Sanitary District is committed to providing a drug-free
workplace. To achieve this goal, thereby helping to assure the safety, health, and well-
being of District employees, it is the policy of the District that employees comply with the
following requirements. Compliance with this policy shall be considered a condition of
continued employment with the District.
1 Sheet 1
-----~---- ---.--.-.-...-.....
of
3
1212A-9/90
1 . Employees shall not unlawfully possess or be under the influence of
controlled substances during working hours.
2. Employees shall not unlawfully possess, use, manufacture, distribute,
dispense, or sell to any person any controlled substances when at the
worksite, on District property, while on duty, or while in paid status.
3. Employees shall not have their ability to work safely and efficiently impaired
as a result of the use of controlled substances. If an employee whose work
is impaired for a legitimate reason, due to the use of medically supervised
and prescribed controlled or uncontrolled substances, the employee is
encouraged to notify his or her supervisor of this fact and to provide his or
her supervisor with a physician's written recommendation as to work
restrictions, if any. Reasonable accommodation will be arranged for the
employee, provided such alternate work assignments exist given the level
and duration of the impairment as determined by a physician.
4. If convicted of a criminal drug violation occurring at the workplace, an
employee must notify his/her supervisor within five days ,of the conviction
pursuant to federal law.
5. Employees may be subject to disciplinary action up to and including
termination for criminal drug possession, use, manufacture, distribution, or
sale occurring at the worksite, on District property, while on duty, or while
in paid status.
The District will act to eliminate any substance abuse because it increases the potential
for accidents, absenteeism, substandard performance, poor employee morale, or damage
to the District's reputation. Drug abuse will not be tolerated, and disciplinary action
commensurate with the violation, up to and including termination, will be used as
necessary to achieve this goal.
An Employee Assistance Program (EAP) has been established for the benefit of the
District's employees. One of the purposes of this' program is to assist employees who
voluntarily seek help for drug problems. Employees who think they may have a drug
problem are encouraged to contact the EAP Counselor for assistance. Treatment
activities will be handled by the EAP in a confidential manner, and the District shall not
be notified or provided with any information in regards to the counseling.
While the District is supportive of those employees who seek help voluntarily, the District
will be equally firm in disciplining, pursuant to the District's Disciplinary Policy and
Procedures, those who continue to be substance abusers and who threaten the safety
and interests of themselves, their fellow workers, and the public.
I sheet
2
of
3
1212B-9/90
.. ._----------_.__."------_._-_._._------'----~._---_._------..-.-----.
PROMULGATION OF POLICY
This policy shall be communicated to all employees and reaffirmed at least annually during
the term of grant programs.
In addition, the District will establish a drug-free awareness program that will inform
employees and management about (1) the District's policy and commitment toward
maintaining a drug-free workplace; (2) the dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; (3)
available drug counseling and rehabilitation programs; (4) the penalties that may be
imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations in the workplace.
Nothing in this policy shall be interpreted to require any individual to forfeit any
constitutional right.
I Sheet
3
of
3
12128-9190
. ..----------..---.--.-.---.--...-----.----T--...-.-----.--.-.---.---...------.-.---------....
April 2, 1992
6. CORRESPONDENCE a.
Page 1 of 4
Receive letter from Mr. Richard E. Kennett, representing William and Patricia
Scarbrough/a Franchisee of Burger King Corporation, concerning Facility
Capacity Fees
WILUAM AND PATRICIA SCARBROUGH 1 A FRANCHISEE OF BURGER KING CORPORATION
February 28, 1992
0
aztEilvE
FEB 2 8 1992
CCCSD
�!!�L,tr�} w■■ , „r Y. ... h 1p,go1w1 pini
HAND DELIVERED
Ms. Joyce Murphy, Secretary of the District
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, California 94553-4392
RE: Facilities Capacity Fee
Dear Ms. Murphy:
On February 28, 1992, Devil Mountain Foods, one of our
partnerships, was charged a fee of One Thousand Three Hundred
Eighty One Dollars and Eight Cents ($1,381.08) in order to
proceed with the construction of an addition to an existing
Burger King Restaurant in Pleasant Hill, California.
The fees were paid "under protest" as we believe them to be
unreasonable, in the extreme, given the circumstances. Based
upon our objection, the District staff suggested we bring the
matter before the Board of Directors.
Therefore, we would appreciate your scheduling us for an
appearance before the Board of Directors so we may explain the
reasons for our protest and obtain a reduction of the fees paid.
Attached as Exhibit 'A' is a brief explanation of the factual
situation for your use. Additional information will be presented
at the meeting.
If you have any questions or if additional information is
required, please contact us.
Thank you for your courtesy and assistance.
Very truly yours,
Richard E. Kennett
Enclosure
2280 DIAMOND BOULEVARD, SUITE 350, CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94520
TELEPHONE: (510) 671-7970 FAX: (510) 671-0608
EXHIBIT A
In 1989 contact was first made with City of Pleasant Hill wherein
the addition of a drive-thru service with a "pop -out" window was
discussed.
After more than two (2) years of discussion and hearings, with
several design changes being made at the direction of the City of
Pleasant Hill (City), a building permit was issued by the City.
No mention was made of the requirement to obtain a separate
permit from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District.
Our original plans called for the addition of approximately
twelve (12) square feet, sufficient to accommodate a drive-thru
window. Such was not acceptable to the City for aesthetic
reasons and the addition was changed to accommodate their
concerns, resulting in an addition of three hundred (300) square
feet.
As a result of the increase in the size of the addition, we
decided to utilize the extra space to rearrange a portion of our
equipment, install new and more energy efficient refrigeration,
and remodel the dining area. As a result of equipment
rearranging two (2) floor sinks were installed in the addition;
no increase in equipment occurred, only rearranging.
Further, as the addition increased in size we believed it would
be appropriate to add a floor drain in it's center in order to
facilitate cleaning. The drain was not required by the building
code.
Installation of the floor drain resulted in our being charged
$1,381.08 by the District, which in the circumstances we believe
to be unreasonable.
We have no objection to the payment of a reasonable
processing/inspection fee. However, we believe good judgment
must also be utilized in applying the current fee schedule to
circumstances such as these.
0
0
•
992
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019.
mhoff Place, Martinez, California 94553-4392
(510) 689-3890
March 5, 1992
Mr. Richard E. Kennett
Burger King
2280 Diamond Blvd., Suite 350
Concord, CA 94520
Dear Mr. Kennett:
ROGER J. DOLAN
General Manager
Chief Engineer
KENTON L ALM
Counsel for the District
(510) 938-1430
JOYCE E MURPHY
Secretary of the District
This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter dated February 28, 1992, concerning
payment of facilities capacity fees. Your letter will be presented to the Board of Directors
at their regular meeting on March 19, 1992. You are invited to attend the meeting and
address the Board at that time, if you wish. The meeting begins at 3 p.m. and will be
held at the District offices at 5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, California.
Sincerely,
C
cL E. Murphy
P Y
ecretary of the District
cc: Board of Directors
R. Dolan
R. Baker
D. Williams
J. Miyamoto-Mills
v
3z CP ee f-rit‘
-gP66 0-00)fieffiu Li )1
'dog
foi
jriECEOVED
MAH 9 9982
CCCSD
• tr • r
Recycled Paper
c7)m
(i)
w
LLJ
z
W
W
Ci)(i)
m
W
z
0
DETERMINE
J
0
cc Z
w Q
z
w cf)
(.9 w
Liu a
I -0a
z �
(1)a a
� a
0
Q
w
Q
cc Q o"
ui
cn
Q�
U � CL W Ci)
CC
cc Z
OO �
LLI cw �
QU �O
2U
U Q o
0
0
}
cc
EE
d
cc
L.L
W
J
U
LL.cc
cc
cr)
W
U
O
a
D
Z
O
U
w
O
FOR SOME USER GROUPS OR ON REQUEST
0
›-
Ci)
i J
N m w
fa_
O 0 �
0 0
Ji' 2-4/2/92
m
0
W
J
U
J
U
w
CCw
(/)w
w
NON-RESIDENTIAL
a
cn
O cl. 2
..J
LL
I o
'LLJ o0 D
W �
C/) H JCC J
CI) as ia
w
< —1 ;-
03 LLI I—
V) (92
i ° w0
i-- 0 C.7) CC c7)
2 —I LLI i— Lil
LL = Cn CC
0
CCCC
(f)w W
I—
Qz° 1-- z°
cl 0
V wZ WZ
2 F—< H Q
O Er) J u) J
z
a a
� ��
�
wz w
Iw
Iw
X
w p
0 0 0 C-5 (.9 W
Z Cr -1 =2 cc Z cllal
P 0 ZZ 2
U Q2 � W � W .
Q H 0 Lill > U -I >
_i. C/) I- I- I- I -
.__i o oW0 Ci CO 11.1 w
1 1 1
CO
0
STRENGTH
D
Z
0
LL
JM2 - 4/2/92
RELATIONSHIP
0
J
LL
cinW
W
LL
NON-RESIDENTIAL
MONITORING
W
Cc
IX i—
� � Cii
W
Q � E3J W
Q 0 Q
Z
1-<W
0 cn 1—
oQ a
� E.3
z 0 0 cn
Li_ w �
Q Q
a_ W
o:
1— cl) <1- cc cc
cc m w
o 0
W
� �o � w
LI. i_ O z
w 0� � Zi
1—� � D
cn H
OC
c�i> > a O C7
Z
Ci)O 5
i g
V 1�
O —
�Zo
D 0
> z 0 CC
0 I-- 0_
CC OV W W
_j Z a w
COLLECTION
2
�
Q Q 2 > M
u_ P 2 Cn 1.1.1 co
2 Z
Wi: 0 m%-
0 0_ CO U —I
ET) 2 Er- IT cc E-
.< 0 o-
rc. cf9 a_ cc u) <
zz 2 D
00 DO
2 0cn 0
RESIDENTIAL
W
O
U
PLUMBING
cc
0
LL
}
H
Z
CnO
U
w
w
C7
Z
Cn
0
J
LL
0
W
J
W
F--
Zco
1— 0)
• cc
. Q
• n
w
wn
Q
w_
OU
Up
cc CI)
wQ
Q�
L1.1
Q�
�O
J
JM2 - 4/2/92
RELATIONSHIP
STRENGTH
NON-RESIDENTIAL
AMENDMENT,
z
w
Liu
w
rc
cf)U
U
U
0
OC
LL
LV
W
i
w
CC M
m
0)
DC
iJ) CC
wQ
2
� W
W
W
� Q
0
WCC
a
Q
CO F -
Q
Q
< >
Ca cc
WO
ll-
§w
wZ
Q w
HCn�
< (9
O �
Q
cc
Q �co Ct
INCLUDES:
w
cnm
H
0
CC
2
H
0
W
cc
pc
EE 0
u.
cn
z z
nO
0 F.: U
aI• T 12
1— 2 0
E Ci) Cr
>.
E 0
71 F. C/)
Pi LI)
n < i- (in
cc<z0 ZO V�0 OW qct
F-5
2- I— co
cc
Q0 Zw ceii
�w Q� m �
< ›- w
CO z � < a 0 0
<0< w�
ua C) cn CC C7
JM2 -4/2/92
0
0
01 CO
1
! i !
i ! •
i 1
i
= 1
3
1 =
1
1
i 1 1i
i i 1
1
1 i
it 1
1 I 1
I .
1
i
11
1
- - - - I -� . . 1
--T -E-
0
0 00 0 0 0
0 Lo 0 Lo Lo
cv
0 CD
[Lo= Z
I—
Lil
CC
1
M
O O �
W
N D
cv T 1—
AVG
AdQ E12d SNOT1VO NI MOld
0
1.11ww
W v
< <
0- a-,
U ~
z
OQ
w Lk!
m
0
0
M
O O O O O O
O O O O O O
O
LO O to O In
M N CSJ "r- -+-
AVO did SNO11VE NI MOld
0
0
(7D trai Contra Costa Sanitary to
5019 I off Aarei ■ Martinez, CA 94553.4392. (415) 689-38 • F 415) 676-7211
02-28-92
DEVIL MOUNTAIN FOODS
2280 DIAMOND BLVD, STE 350
CONCORD, CA 94520
ATLAS NO: 47B2
677 CONTRA COSTA BLVD
PLEASANT HILL, CA.
COMMERCIAL
TRACT/LOT: /
Fixture
TOILET
LAVATORY/HAND SINK
BAR SINK
FS-SINK/SERVICE SINK
FLOOR DRAIN
URINALS
EWC OR FS CONDENSATE
SHOWERS
Facilities Capacity Fee
RT REST -PAPER SERV
RT REST -PAPER SERV
Pump Zone Fee
Watershed Fees
Annexation Charge
Annexation Charge
Equalization Charge
Processing Fee
Rebate JOB:
Rebate JOB:
SSC MOS:
SSC MOS:
Inspection fees
A ALTERATION
ENR:
ENR:
RECEIPT NO: 25514
JOB NO: 2737
PARCEL#: 153-250--007--9
Multiplier # Units
4
1
2
3
2 1
2
1 2
2
Total Fixtures: 4
@
661.04--
0
61.04-----0 661.04
Acres: 0.00 0
Units:
Units:
Paid by Check
ADDED TWO CONDENS. DRAINS, 1
FLOOR DRAIN; PLUGGED TWO
CONDENSATE DRAINS - CHARGED
FOR 1 FLOOR DRAIN
PAID UNDER PROTEST
L:
Payor
0.00 0
0.00 0
1
Units
4.00
-2.00
Units
SUBTOTAL:
0.00 /Acre
0.00 /Mo
0.00 /Mo
57.00 /Unit
Permit Issue Fee:
TOTAL CHARGE $
Tendered:
EXTENSION
2,644.16
-1,322.08
EXTENS ION
1,322.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
57.00
2.00
1,381.08
1,381.08
a)a-7lqa
April 2. 1992
6. CORRESPONDENCE b.
Page 1 of 3
Receive letter from Mr. Leonard Steffen concerning Facility Capacity Fees
1
REMOVED
R 241992
LEONARD J. STEFFEN
GENERAL BUILDING CONTRACTOR
CCCSD PROJECT & DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING
SECRETARY OF THE DISTRICT
70 STON I NGTON CT.
DANVILLE, CA 94526
(510) 837-7646
LICENSE B 401576
March 20, 1992
Pres. Board of Directors
Parke Boneysteele
Central Contra Costa Sanitary Dist.
5019 Imhoff P1.
Martinez, Calif. 94553-4392
Mr. Boneysteele,
We would like to request the Sanitary Board to reconsider the
Facility Capacity Fee charged to us on 3-13-92 ( see attached
receipt).
We are building a second master suite (granny suite) in the house
at 165 Br od i a Way, now under construction. We want to add a two
burner cooktop to the wet bar so she can do some limited cooking.
We are now faced with two Facility Capacity Fees, and we would
like to be only charged one since our impact is so nominal.
The completed home including the second master is only a 4
bedroom -3&1/2 bath house, with a total of 3 occupants. The
Hayes' want to have their mother live with them to avoid the
retirement home situation. They still will be paying the yearly
sanitary fees at a higher rate, it is only the capacity fee we
are asking for relief. We would like the Board to show it's
support of the elderly by not penalizing the Hayes $1905.00 to
have their mother live with them.
Th k ou.
i J. Steffen
cc Mr. and Mrs. J. Hayes
":"Lentral Contra Costa Sanitary Distr
5019 Imhoff Place • Martinez, CA 94553-4392 a (415) 689-3890 • Fax: (415) 676-7211
03-13-92
LEONARD STEFFEN
70 STONINGTON CT
DANVILLE, CA 94526
ATLAS NO: 75E1
165 BRODIA WAY
WALNUT CREEK, CA
Zone # 1
Watershed 27
RECEIPT NO: 25545
JOB NO: 4144
RESIDENTIAL
TRACT/LOT: /B PARCEL#: 140-180-023-8
Fac. Cap. W.S. Credit
Facility Capacity Fee 3,810.00 +
Pump Zone Fee
Annexation Charge Acres:1.00 @ 240.00 /Acre
DA
Equalization Charge
Processing Fee
Rebate JOB: ENR:
Rebate JOB: ENR:
SSC MOS:2 Units: 2 @ 12.58 /Mo
Refundable deposit
Inspection fees
T TAP
L LATERAL
H HOUSE INSP
Permit Issue Fee:
Paid by Check
GRANNY UNIT + SFR
PAID UNDER PROTEST
Payor
3,810.00
240.00
9,460.59
50.32
194.00
57.00
57.00
2.00
TOTAL CHARGE $ 13,870.91
Tendered: 13,870. 9
0
$.4 to
O b •�
6,--1 N 1
�a v cn E 0 •tee ■
•171 $4Ordcn4J cn
ni al 4_4 $.4
asp o 00--i
en—ii N
rd •-.1
• r -i • rl
r-1 4-4 '44 W A rd
b O O •�
fir -I 11. >
4-1 N G1 O O
� to b ?+03)
b N to
•.-� N N N5 N N
to $4 4-) b to W
s -t >, 5 1 Orn U05
Frt Cif $4 1
ra W
•
b
cu fai (t1 144
4-) tn 0
I-1 $.4 044 E
KS 4-1 O S.1 O CI) N
b Z U 0 0 O
sr4 r-4 rt, $4
cn b U N
+) b N O b
• N W rl 0 NON
b � to Clla) 0 E rti
•ri .1.1 U r -I U N
w o w w
rd a 3rd
1.
in ii -4 (li fil in
. 1.1) -r-1 4 rd Ili 0 CU 1 0
rii CO -I-I 0 0 4-1 -r-I F*4 U 0
-IA N 0 W rd .1-1 rd Z • .-4
O U W O rd b H .[ • U +J co
b +1 b b 4-1 +1 N b rl N R9 4 0 ,-i
•�+ •.-i •moo •� b in 14 4-i w 3 E
N U 4-/ i -i r--1 co b O 0 't3
spa WEz ubbW •.-I o �.
KS rd o o Z W 1 g 4:: 74- cosi ti4
O N 4-1 .[ -r-1 11 10 N b b
bin CU •�H:+10�TO+1 r-Ia
� � � b • b � .a-� b .N .� b 3 4
cn r -i ZZO 3 cnCU ,--I cn •ri
b 4J0 � v 41W N .[ b � 4
� 4-1 • I -I in E to 4J 4-i z N N $4 X
�� ba�io°c�.°N'�.[�►b�ba.�w
iw�bAO V4 -1N WI a (1)1 N 0 - � b �
.1-1 4 rI .-I� ..A O LH ,s4 rn
a) al b3•-1�r—I 1 wp •metro ko
b P 34 bn b O (i U 'L7 . +1 C b P-+
• r -I O W b % N .[ U 3-4 N • r -I • 1-I N
tn4-1+1a,-1 $4NubN4b5 u) el a
v aa(1) ba.`i ()2s•�o its
C:4 4-1 b (n u 4i .i.) b bf-1 aE 14
U 4 $4 Z -..-1 4 fx, (0 4.1 1,-1 0 0
.--1 W U b fd N O U � N • W Z N 0 O--
Z .0 u) 4-1 Z 4 -/-1 ni MI 4
O 0 •rl 0 b !A 0--1 4 b 19W 14 N +1 •
•r-1 N 4 Q1 (I) b 4-1 en O rd .[ b rd
'L9 A 0 en Z b > C to !4 b b
rCI P CV
� � -,-I.[ (1)W V CJI (1) (11 r1:1 ili mi � O E r-1 W ,4 E
r -I 4 +1 +1 ri-I `IA !-1 ; to b 4-) O
rti +3 U A cn bn b N tri u) C 'd O O
.4 ii -i Z 0 b N 4-) N O NA $.1
Q in O H ih-I U )4 • f -I tri b .-I v1 •.-1 Z 't3
4-1 4.1 • rl r --I lC; $4 'L9 to 4-1 bn u) N
4.i in i-1 V r -I • rl R! P-1 rd • rl •.-I A
•� 4ii Z a ad Q) J LL d • N •r -I
OW 004,43•�+WOo WbP
0 to U b +) 'd ,-i- tn A V b 'L9 4-1 O
0
April 2, 1992
6. CORRESPONDENCE c.
Page 1 of 8
Receive letter from Ms. Sarah Paukert concerning a sewer problem on Glenside
Drive in Lafayette; consider draft response
Parke L. .3oneystee le
President of The r3 oard of Directors
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place
llLartinez, Ca.
Dear 1.,r. Boneysteele:
,-arch 18-1992
REMOVED
BAR 2 0 1992
CCCSD
SECRETARY OF THE DISTRICT
I
feel that 1 must bring the following sewer problem on Glenside Drive
in Lafayette, to your attention.
In July 1991, realizing that my husbands post stroke paralysis was not going
to get better, 1 decided that I must create an easier access from the car to
the house --To do so, i would have to remove a section of the paved drive,
and, assuming that our sewer connection lay somewhere under it-enroute to
the area of the clean out located on the northerly point of the lot, i came
to the Sanitary District office to find just where it crossed --i was given
the following information:
(1) The sewer permit #616, was issued Feb. 15--1949
(2) Final approval was given Feb. 17-1950
(3) Precise routing data for those early years was not avai lao1e----i
recieved a copy of the map showing the general location of the
Districts lines to the area.
1 then called Roto -hooter to locate the line ---{They establisned the following:
(1) The line, instead of crossing our own property, goes out into the
roadway, and then down the roadway, parallel with the bottom of
our drive --They were unaole to go beyond that point since no clean
out was ever installed to reach the 100 plus feet of sewer line
that runs down the roadwayl1
(2) They also found several very sharp bends in the line running from
the house to the street, as evidenced by their electric snake piling
up before finally break L ig through—so the entire installation was
very poofly laid out ---Finally understood why we have always nad
a problematic sewer system ----Why:
(a) My did it pass inspection?
(b) thy was the sewer extension to the property run so far south
on the lot when the house was already in place on the north
end of the lot—It appears that someone working from a plat
of the area, .Here ly designated the center of the frontage
footage, ignoring the shape of the lot which required the
house to be set on the north end.
(c) ,,ost importantly, why was the connecting line installed in the
roadway instead of crossing, what was then, an open hillside,
void of retaining walls--steps--trees etc.?
I re1iLed that only The Sanitary Listric t could answer (a) and (o) --As for
(c) 1 rationalized that the roadway easement -ust have been changed after
the connection was in place --However; a thorough record search---131dd. dept . --
Dept . of Records ---public dorks ept . ---revealed that the 50 foot roadway
was already in place on the asap that was retired in 193711
(2)
It beca de evident that The Sanitary District had actually issued a permit
to install the 100 plus feet of sewer line down the roadway, and gave
final approval without even having a clean-out in the line.
In view of the above, and with extensive road worms nearing completion,
It is imperative that this problem ae addressed as soon as possible.
Having established that The Sanitary District was responsible for
creating the problem, 1 feel it must participate in correcting it by
doing the following:
(1) Installing a clean-out to service and maintain the 100 plus feet
of sewer line running down the roadway.
(2) Jaiving any c onnecting/inspection fees for replacing the line
from the house to the street.
It is my hope, that by working together, this problem can be resolved
without having to resort to litigation.
Lay 1 hear from you at your earliest convenience.
Sin erely, ,2
(14
Sarah Yau_ ert
766 Glenside drive
Lafayette, tea. 94549
copy to: Lark Lander Lafayette City Lngineer
Gregg Pfiester.6xcavation Contractor for street irnproveiaents
March 27, 1992
Mrs. Sarah Paukert
766 Glenside Drive
Lafayette CA 94549
Dear Mrs. Paukert:
SIDE SEWER AT 766 GLENSIDE DRIVE, LAFAYETTE
Your letter dated March 18, 1992, in which you indicated that you felt the District must
participate in correcting a problem with the private side sewer serving your home at 766
Glenside Drive has been referred to me for a response. In your letter you stated that the
permit for your side sewer was issued February 15, 1949, and final approval was given
on February 17, 1950. District staff has confirmed these dates. A copy of the actual
permit is attached for your information.
The standards applicable to the installation of side sewers have changed since 1950. The
requirement to install cleanouts every 100 feet was established after 1956. Since there
was no requirement to install a cleanout as described in your letter, none was installed.
Upgrades to existing side sewers are the responsibility of property owners. Therefore,
if a cleanout is needed to service and maintain your side sewer, it is your responsibility
to pay the cost of the installation of a cleanout.
In your letter you asked two questions regarding the location of the sewers serving your
home. Your first question concerns the distance between the District's public sewer and
your home. Your second question was why your side sewer was located in the roadway.
Please refer to the attached map which shows the District maintained public sewers as
you read the following answers to your questions.
With respect to your first question, you stated in your letter that your home was in place
before the public sewer was installed. Your lot has a triangular configuration. The wide
portion of the triangle where your home was built is away from the public sewer. The
public sewer was extended into Glenside Drive along the property line between 735 and
737 Glenside to a point in front of your property. It is the past and current practice of
the District to install public sewers along property lines when sewers must be located in
private property. Therefore, the reason your side sewer is so long is a combination of the
configuration of your property and the location of the property line between 735 and 737
Glenside.
With respect to your second question, your side sewer was installed at its existing
location in the roadway due, in part, to the slope and elevation of your property and the
location of the plumbing in your home. Since your home was already in place before the
public sewer was installed, your home was most likely served by a septic tank when it
was built. When your home was connected to the public sewer, the new side sewer
probably started at a point on the pipe which ran from your home to the septic tank. If
this is what actually occurred, the pipe to the septic tank dictated the location of the side
sewer. Unfortunately, the precise reason your side sewer is at its present location cannot
be determined because insufficient record information exists.
As stated earlier in this letter, the District has no responsibility for the cost of upgrading
private side sewers. However, in the spirit of cooperation, the Board of Directors at their
meeting on April 2, 1992, decided that it would be appropriate to waive inspection fees
for the work which is necessary to replace your existing side sewer. When your sewer
contractor comes to the District to obtain a sewer permit for the replacement work, have
the contractor give the person at the permit counter a copy of this letter. You will not be
charged for inspection fees. Please be advised that no connection fees are due if the only
work involved is replacing the side sewer.
On behalf of the Board, 1 thank you for bringing this matter to our attention.
Sincerely,
Jay S. McCoy
Infrastructure Division Manager
JSM/gv
Attachments
1
V P6970F
so P59279R
10
rF
ToN
3 L..EP8»F
727
IF
pl591L H
25
4LH
24
ro
4
M GLEN
27d -6\1C-156 .'
l‘\
P59/F
M •
13
P1274 6F N
M
QA
LOS
ENC _X1561
22 5
125531F
<#.3
2 755
DE
P57/7F
CIR
p7200F
A
14
P49o4F
N
15
23
P70854
P5 9239R8
P563LH
LO ,‘G\
k_(\i ;1"
..-
S
O a�
(D
U
722 Z
7/4 �
g63LH
711
70 7
p324 6F
7't
1
22
P79/4F
3 P4CFP49T01F
coj2 6-30-75
p592LH
p4115717
co
10
co
21
P89O1F
P5 65LH
p708708
710
810608
P528 6LN
0
16
0
P5786F
R
17
4Z-` 'k . P2076LH
737
23011. 6VC _ X1561
735
1�
2
3
P562LH
P691248
P79I5F
o�
P544468
4
17
p5 4ILH
P11595F
5
16 cfl
P5
40LHO )f.
P486LH
P128168
p4888
727
72/
77
7/1
P496LH
788
PUBLIC SEWER
/2-
PI l58eLN
754
748
p12011H
�4 n
P544LFI
PAGE 1 OF 2
NO.
9. BUDGET AND FINANCE a.
DATE
March 31, 1992
TYPE OF ACTION
CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE DRAFT FISCAL YEAR 1992-93
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET (CIB) FOR INCLUSION
IN THE 1992-93 DISTRICT BUDGET
APPROVE CIB
SUBMITTED BY
John J. Mercurio, Admin. Analyst
INITIATING DEPTJOIV.
Engineering Department/Planning Division
ISSUE: On March 19, 1992, the Board of Directors held a workshop and public hearing on the
draft Fiscal Year 1992-93 CIBl1992 Ten-Year CIP. The Board continued consideration of approval
of the CIB for inclusion in the 1992-93 District Budget until April 2, 1992.
BACKGROUND: The CIB/CIP was submitted to the Board of Directors' Capital Projects Committee
for review on February 4, 1992. The document was submitted to the full Board on March 5,
1992. A workshop and public hearing was held on March 19, 1992, and the Board approved the
CIP. During the workshop, Board members asked for additional information on several pertinent
CIB issues. These issues are:
o What are the projected 1992-93 expenditures by program (see Attachment 1) ;
o For what proportion of requested authorizations will contractual reimbursement by the City
of Concord and Caltrans be received (see Attachment 1) ;
o Which scheduled projects are most deferable;
o How will staff assure the Board that adequate funding is available at the time each
construction contract award authorization request is made?
Staff will provide the information requested in a brief presentation.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the CIB for inclusion in the 1992-93 District Budget.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
JJM
JMM
DRW
RAB
INITIATING DEPTJDIV.
f'h
0/(1/ f)B)
~
1302A-7/91
"...... --.--"-"-."--T".
"'0('1) en 0 0 0 0
Q) 0) Q) 0 0 0 0
+-' I ~ 0 0 0 0
uN::J ~ ~ ~
Q) 0) :t: .q ('I) LO N
.- "'0
eO) c '" CO ..- N "'0('1) +-' - .... ~ 0
a.."-Q) <X> ('I) ('I) LO Q)O) C 0 0 0
~ Q) 0 0
CO '" CO 0 +-' I 0
X ..- .q uN E 0 0 ~
w ..- .~O) Q) ~ 0)
o(f> o(f> 00) UJ ('I) LO LO
~ ~ N ..- ..-
0.."- ::J <X> 0) ~
.0 0)
E .q ('I) o(f>
o(f>
Q)
a:
- c 0 0 0 0 - c 0 0 0 0
>- .e 0 0 0 0 0 .e 0 0 0 0 0
a: 0'- 0 0 0 0 o .- 0 0 0 0
oCt I-~ ~ ~ I- CO ~
N LO '" ..- ('I) N LO '" ..- ('I)
:! .~ 00 ('I) ('I) .~ 00 ('I) ..- ('I)
:! 0 ('I) Ln Ln V 0 ('I) Ln Ln ~
..c ~ ~ ..c ~ ~
:J +-' '" ..- CO LO ~ +-' '" ..- CO LO
(/) ::::l .q N '" Z ::::l .q N '"
I- <( o(f> o(f> C2 <( o(f> o(f>
w oCt
~ J:
C (/)
:J
CO l-
I- -C"'O 0 0 0 0 (/) en .... C'l 0
.... CO 0 Q) 0 CO +-' 0 0 0
I- Z c ._ 0 0 0 0 (.) ::::l C 0 0 0 0
O+-'en 0 0 0 0 +-' Q) 0
Z w .- CO Q) ~ ~ u E 0 0 0 -<i
:! :t: N ::J '" V CO '" I- CO ~
W "'0 .~ 0) ('I) .q '" Z ~ Q) 00 LO ..- 0
:! w +-' CO N
> "'OOQ) 00 0 V ('I) W c en ..- CO
J: <('5a: :! o ~ N 0) V ~
(.) 0 <X> N ..- N u,g ~ ~ '"
a: ::::l ('I) ..- LO W ('I) ('I) ..-
oCt Q. <( o(f> o(f> > E ..- o(f>
I- :! 0 Q) o(f>
I- a: a:
oCt ..J Q.
oCt :!
l-
e: ..J
oCt ~I 0 0 0 0 oCt en Q) 0 0 0 0
I-
(.) Q) Q) 0 0 0 0 e: ~ ~ 0 0 0 0
+-' > Cl CO
M COO 0 0 0 0 oCt en..c 0 0 0 0
~ ~ ~ ~
en E <X> ('I) LO CO (.) uen '" N 0 0)
I
N 'p ~ <X> 0 CO LO U+-' ..- N 0) N
0') en ~ ~ Ln 0 0 u:g ..- CO 0 <X>
en w CO ~
U 00 0) LO ('I) U V '" CO '"
.... N ('I) ..- LO
>- o(f> o(f> o(f> o(f>
u.
en
+-'
C
Q)
E E E ('I)
+-' Q) Q) +-' Q) 0) "'0
C +-' > C +-' I ~
CO en 0 CO en en N 0
a.. >- ~ a.. >- +-' 0) U
(/) c. en c 0) C
+-' E +-' Q) ..- 0
c c c c E u
J Q) 0 J Q) 0 Q) >- - UJ
E +-' CO E 'p CO > U. o c
u ~ u ~ 0 >-~
+-' Q) Q) +-' ~ Q)
CO CO CO C C. CO
Q) C +-' Q) +-' +-' +-'
~ 0 Q) 0 ~ 0 Q) E 0 uro
I- U t9 l- I- U t9_ I- ~ U
- ....
April 2, 1992
11. REPORTS a.1)
Page 1 of 9
Receive Update on Central County Household Hazardous Waste Program and
consider draft letter to Danville, Lafayette, Orinda, and Moraga
ATTACHMENT 1
FY 1992-93 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET SUMMARY
$16,874,000
$47,385,000
17,363,000
21,537,000
76 c 0 0 0
o+r y0 0 0 0
.4., 2 a)
"117 - M vi Cr;
-0 8 QroC �el
0 Tt
+� 00 N r -
Q
+J °' 0 0 0
�▪ p o 0 0
E >, ao c+) is
y i � � �
W 0 00 1:77 Lr]
E
Treatment Plant
Collection System
General Improvements
$40,522,000
$75,433,000
$ 52,377,000
$ 23,056,000
0)
4-.
0
H
a)cm c0 0 0o
UN E a 0 0 0
a)
.0 co u)ELai — ` N oil - N 00
.ca Tr
E 4 1'
a)
cr
$47,385,000
21,537,000
0
Ln
0) c 0 0
c
0 0) 0 0
E
Ln r
C L N a) �t
C� _ C) C)
E
.a)
cc
0)
❑ cocaos
C� ci)
U y
C..) 0
E
c�
0
a
$1
$34,117,000
Treatment Plant
17,622,000
Collection System
6090.000
0)
c
a)
Improvements
$75,433,000
$17,604,000
$57,829,000
Total FY 1992-93
CCCSD
3 kil Al' hit rr �
A summary of projected FY 1992-93 Capital Improvement Program revenue and expenditures is
presented below:
Butanes
Facilities Capacity Fees $3,495,000
Pumped Zone Fees 20,E
Annexation Charges 136,000
Interest 3,266,000
Ad Valorem Taxes 8,746,000
Sewer Service Charges 135,000
Funds from Other Government Agencies
Grants 0
City of Concord 5,244,000
Caltrans 3,915,000
Contra Costa Water Dist. 0
Bond/COP Sale Proceeds 20,000,000
Miscellaneous Income 1.250.000
Total Revenues: $46,207,000
Expeild.
tuts
Treatment Plant Program $16,874,000
Collection System Program 17,363,E
General Improvement Program 5,715,E
Debt Ret remen 600,000
Total Expenditures $40,522,000
A summary of Sewer Construction Fund status is presented below:
Projected Beginning Balance $63,234,000
(711192)
+Projected Revenues 46,207,000
—Projected Expenditures 40.552.009
Projected Sewer Construction $68,889,000
Balance (6/30/93)
Specific information regarding the Revenue and Expenditure categories referenced above are
included in the 1992 Capital Improvement Plan. The 1992 Plan anticipates the revenue from the
issuance of debt (Bond or Certificate of Participation sale) at three-year intervals beginning in FY
1992-93. This revenue is needed to meet the cash flow requirements of several large projects
designed to addresswet weather overflow reduction goals and to comply with emerging air
emission, water quality, and safety regulations.
FY 1992-93 Capital Improvement Budget/ 1992 Capital Improvement Plan
-- 9 —
...THE CURRENT BALANCE OF THE SEWER CONSTRUCTION
FUND THIS
S PRESENTED IN
PROJECT. A FUNDING SUMMARY
a
ATTACHMENT
J2 - 4/2/92
ATTACHMENT
SUMMARY
65,000,000
(33,000,000)
UJ
U cn
Z z
0
m
0 N
� O
ti
O �
CC
cc
cf)
U o
� Z
OEr
U �
w z
w�
�,
W
Z
w
wCC
DEPENDABLE
c
J ISI 2 - 4/2/92
CC0
Z
O
C7
UJ
CC
W
LU
W
Z
w cc
0z
W
W
< LU
I- 2
8: Q�
c� ❑
cc
Lu
cs
UJ
TREATMENT PLANT PROGRAM'
FY 1992-93 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET
SUBPROGRAM/PROJECT
1. HYDRAULIC/PROCESS CAPACITY
AERATION BASIN EXPANSION
DISINFECTION FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS
HEADWORKS BYPASS PIPELINE -PHASE 1
HEADWORKS FACILITY EXPANSION NEAR-TERM
OUTFALL DILUTION AND TOXICITY PROJECT
OUTFALL IMPROVEMENTS -PHASE 3
SECONDARY CLARIFIER IMPROVEMENTS
SECONDARY FACILITIES STAGING PLAN
WET -WEATHER DISCHARGE PT RELOCATION -PH 1
SUBPROGRAM TOTAL
2. SOLIDS HANDLING
FURNACE THC MONITORING
MHF EMISSION CONTROLS
RESIDUAL MATERIALS HANDLING PROJECT
SLUDGE LIME STABILIZATION
SLUDGE TREATMENT PILOT TESTING
SOLIDS CONDITIONING BLDG ENHANCEMENTS
ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT
EXPENDITURES COST
82,000.00
2,223,000.00
727,000.00
5, 058, 000.00
196,000.00
10,000.00
638,000.00
50,000.00
75,000.00
8,432,000.00
17,339,000.00
1,659,000.00
30,777,000.00
353,000.00
3,678,000.00
7,094,000.00
256,000.00
588,000.00
9,059,000.00 70,176,000.00
145,000.00
190,000.00
150,000.00
874,000.00
5,700,000.00
61,000.00
169,000.00
687,000.00
409,000.00
1,272,000.00
400,000.00
198,000.00
SUBPROGRAM TOTAL 7,120,000.00 3,135,000.00
3. WET -WEATHER FACILITIES
SUBPROGRAM TOTAL 0 0
4. PLANT OPERATIONS DEPT.
ACCESS PLATFORM INSTALLATION
COGENERATION FACILITY
FINAL EFFLUENT SAMPLE STATION
FLOW-THROUGH BIO ASSAY FACILITY
LABORATORY FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT
MHF OPERATION IMPROVEMENTS
OPERATIONS CONTROL CONSOLE REPLACEMENT
PLT CRITICAL EQUIP ANALOG BACKUP CONTROL
PLANT SECURITY PROJECTS
PRIMARY CONTROL BUILDING RENOVATION
SERVICE AIR COMPRESSOR #5
SCB-CRANE INSTALLATION
SCB FOUL AIR DUCT IMPROVEMENTS
TELEMETRY SYSTEM REPLACEMENT
SUBPROGRAM TOTAL
5. OTHER PROJECTS
FILTER PLANT REHABILITATION
PREAERATION TANK AREA ODOR CONTROL
STANDBY POWER FACILITY -PHASE 1
TREATMENT PLANT ELECTRICAL AS --BUILT PRGM
TREATMENT PLANT SOIL REMEDIATION
WASTEWATER RECL-URBAN LANDSCAPE IRRIGATE
SUBPROGRAM TOTAL
TREATMENT PLANT PROGRAM TOTAL
FY 1992--93 BUDGET
29,000.00
805,000.00
70,000.00
30,000.00
673,000.00
192,000.00
65,000.00
41,000.00
5,000.00
63,000.00
1.20, 000.00
324,000.00
71,000.00
594,000.00
39,000.00
5,205,000.00
70,000.00
100,000.00
1,004,000.00
400, 000.00
188,000.00
63,000.00
124,000.00
560,000.00
220,000.00
374,000.00
71,000.00
1,114,000.00
3,082,000.00 9,532,000.00
1,649,000.00
841,000.00
2,794,000.00
350,000.00
87,000.00
278,000.00
5,999,000.00
25,260,000.00
2,272,000.00
1,034,000.00
3,917,000.00
400,000.00
474,000.00
457,000.00
8,554,000.00
91,397,000.00
COLLECTION SYSTEM PROGRA
FY 1992-93 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BU GET
SUBPROGRAM/ PROJECT
1. INTERCEPTORS
A -LINE EASEMENT ACQUISITION
A -LINE PREDESIGN
COLLECTION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN UPDATE
COLLECTION SYSTEM PLANNING --TWA STUDY
PLEASANT HILL INTERCEPTOR -PHASE 1A
PLEASANT HILL INT EASEMENT ACQUISITION
SUBPROGRAM TOTAL
2. TRUNKS
COUNTRY GARDENS/THIRD AVE. SEWER IMP -PH 2
I-680/SR--24 SEWER RELOCATIONS -PHASE 4
I--680 /SR -24 SEWER RELOCATIONS -PHASE 3
LOS ARABIS/WOODLAND/LEGION/ACALANES
S. BROADWAY EXTENSION SEWER RELOCATION
WATERSHED 43-100 TRUNK -PHASE E1/M1
SUBPROGRAM TOTAL
3. MAINS
COLLECTION SYSTEM PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS SEWERAGE
LAKEWOOD SUBBASIN RENOVATION PROJECT
ORINDA NEAR-TERM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
OVERHILL DR. SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
SEWER REHAB-SOARES LN/SOUTH TR/DALEWOOD
SUBPROGRAM TOTAL
4. PUMP STATIONS
BUCHANAN FIELD PS #2 POWER TRANSFER
CLYDE PUMP STATION RENOVATION
M-4 PARALLEL FORCE MAINS
MARTINEZ PS UPGRADE
FAIRVIEW/MALTBY PS UPGRADE
ORINDA/MORAGA PS -NEAR TERM
ORINDA/MORAGA PS -WET WEATHER DIESELS
SUBPROGRAM TOTAL
5. CSO DEPT. PROJECTS
COLLECTION SYSTEM RENOVATION PROGRAM
SEWER MAINT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK REPLACEMENT
SUBPROGRAM TOTAL
COLLECTION SYSTEM PROGRAM TOTAL
FY 1992-93 BUDGET
ESTIMATED
EXPENDITURES
30,000.00
71,000.00
109,000.00
40,000.00
1,099,000.00
1,248,000.00
TOTAL PROJECT
COST
1,965,000.00
300,000.00
221,000.00
177,000.00
13,366,000.00
1,600,000.00
2,597,000.00 17,629,000.00
200,000.00
1, 960, 000.00
2,891,000.00
327,000.00
1,128,000.00
72,000.00
1,926,000.00
2,204,000.00
3,179,000.00
2,973,000.00
1,504,000.00
1,354,000.00
6,578,000.00 13,140,000.00
220,000.00
320,000.00
892,000.00
50,000.00
277,000.00
53,000.00
1,812,000.00
44,000.00
147,000.00
2,094,000.00
1,436,000.00
1,840,000.00
453,000.00
535,000.00
220,000.00
2,962,000.00
2,681,000.00
665,000.00
2,518,000.00
455,000.00
9,501,000.00
44,000.00
351,000.00
2,330,000.00
6,891,000.00
3,168,000.00
1,291,000.00
2,800,000.00
6,549,000.00 16,875,000.00
1,250,000.00
125,000.00
58,000.00
1,433,000.00
18,969,000.00
1,250,000.00
446,000.00
58,000.00
1,754,000.00
58,899,000.00
QIVERAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRO
FY 1992-93 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET
SUBPROGRAM/ PROJECT
1. VEHICLES, EQUIPMENT, FURNITURE
EQUIPMENT VEHICLES & FURNITURE ACQU I S
SUBPROGRAM TOTAL
2. LAND PURCHASES
PROPERTY ACQUISITION - FUTURE
SUBPROGRAM TOTAL
3. PROJECTS
AM/CAD APPLICATIONS EXPANSION
COMPUTER AIDED MAPPING & DRAFTING SYSTEM
CSO FACILITY RELOCATION
DISASTER COMMAND CENTER
DISTRICT PROPERTY SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
GC/MS HARD WARE UPGRADE
HEATING/COOLING CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY
IMPROVE RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM -PH 2
MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS UPGRADE
OFFICE SPACE EXPANSION
RECORDS STORAGE EXPANSION/RELOCATION
SUBPROGRAM TOTAL
GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM TOTAL
FY 1992-93 BUDGET
ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT
EXPENDITURES COST
734,000.00 6,434,000.00
734,000.00 6,434,000.00
1,420,000.00 11,823,000.00
1,420,000.00 11,823,000.00
73,000.00 146,000.00
302,000.00 1,585,000.00
1,200,000.00 2,688,000.00
80,000.00 80,000.00
15,000.00 150,000.00
130,000.00 130,000.00
35,000.00 35,000.00
401,000.00 570,000.00
100,000.00 155,000.00
1,473,000.00 1,795,000.00
145,000.00 1,569,000.00
80,000.00 80,000.00
4,034,000.00 8,983,000.00
6,188,000.00 27,240,000.00
O
O
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019
mhoff Place, Martinez, California 94553-4392
(510) 689-3890 • Fax: (510) 676.7211
March 30, 1992
2-�
Dear 3---:
ROGER J. DOLAN
General Manager
Chief Engineer
KENTON L. ALM
Counsel for the District
(510) 938-1430
JOYCE E. MURPHY
Secretary of the District
The District previously offered to be the lead agency for developing a regional household
hazardous waste (HHW) program which would enable participating jurisdictions to satisfy
the requirements of AB 939 related to HHW. The proposed HHW program included
mobile collection with a stationary hub storage facility and small quantity generator
participation. The District considers all these aspects of the proposed program to be
essential in solving the environmental problems of unsafe disposal of HHW and wastes
from small businesses. After the District's conceptual HHW facility design was
developed, the County proposed a mobile HHW collection program similar to the mobile
collection aspect of the District's proposed program. Because of the overlap in the
unincorporated service areas which are the responsibility of the County government under
Assembly Bill 939, our Board expressed concerns of duplicative costs and directed District
staff to work with County staff to resolve this issue prior to proceeding with design and
construction of our HHW program.
As a result of numerous discussions between District and County staff, the County
proposed a course of action to the AB 939 Task Force with which the District's Board has
certain concerns. (See attached letter to Mr. Finucane, March 20,1992.) The County has
decided to proceed with their proposed mobile collection program. Since the County is
responsible for the unincorporated area which includes approximately forty percent of
CCCSD's franchised collection area, it would be impractical for the District to proceed
with our program. The County intends to make their HHW program available to all cities
wishing to participate. Cities have the option to join the County's program, develop their
own program, or, alternatively, approach the Contra Costa Solid Waste Authority to
discuss other options. The County apparently wilt be financing their program through user
fees imposed at transfer stations or landfills. Accordingly, there is a potential for the cost
of the County program to indirectly be imposed on your citizens, regardless of whether
CCCSD undertakes its program.
JOHN B. CLAUSEN
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
WILLIAM C. DALTON PARKE L. BONEY.STEELE SUSAN McNULTY RAINE1 JOSEPH M. STARITA
President
Recycled Paper HOB
1 --
Page 2
March 30, 1992
We appreciate your interest and support of the District's proposed HHW program;
however, with the already skyrocketing cost of solid waste collection, it would be
undesirable to Central County rate payers to carry the cost of two programs. 1 am
enclosing a copy of the County's correspondence to us and our response which explains
our Board's position in this matter. CCCSD, of course, will continue to follow this issue
and, to the extent the Central Contra Costa Solid Waste Authority decides to undertake
additional efforts in this regard, we will keep your apprised their efforts.
Sincerely,
Parke Boneysteele
EJlhb
Enclosures
cc: Board members
Roger Dolan
4 ---
bcc: W. Funasaki
E. Jacobs
P. Morsen
J. Murphy
ADS/Jacobs#3/HHWM obit. ltr
Honorable Beverly Lane
Mayor of Danville
510 La Gonda Way
Danville, CA 94526
Mayor Lane
Ms. Caluha Barnes
Honorable Nancy Gore
Mayor of Concord
1950 Parkside Drive
Concord, CA 94519
Mayor Gore
Mr. Chuck Gabrysiak
Honorable Mary Lou Oliver
Mayor of San Ramon
2222 Camino Ramon
San Ramon, CA 94583
Mayor Gore
Ms. April Gray
Honorable Gregg Manning
Mayor of Clayton
P.O. Box 280
Clayton, CA 94517
Mayor Manning
Mr. Randy Hatch
Honorable Michael M. Menesini
Mayor of Martinez
525 Henrietta Street
Martinez, CA 94553
Mayor Menesini
Ms. Sherry Kelly
Honorable Graig W. Crossley
Mayor of Moraga
P.O. Box 188
Moraga, CA 94556
Mayor Crossley
Mr. Michael Medvedoff
Honorable Sherry M. Sterrett
Mayor of Pleasant Hill
3300 N. Main Street
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523
Mayor Sterrett
Ms. Leanne Nelson
Honorable Evelyn Munn
Mayor of Walnut Creek
1666 North Main Street
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Mayor Munn
Ms. Janet Schneider
Honorable Richard G. Heggie
Mayor of Orinda
26 Orinda Way
Orinda, CA 94563
Mayor Heggie
Mr. Tom Sinclair
Honorable Donald Tatzin
Mayor of Lafayette
251 Lafayette Circle, Suite 120
Lafayette, CA 94549
Mayor Tatzin
Ms. Karen Stein
Mr. Ron Tsugita
Manager/Secretary
Delta Diablo Sanitation District
P. 0. Box 929
Antioch, CA 94509
Mr. Tsugita
Mr. Gregory G. Baatrup
Mr. Alfonso L. Rangel
President of the Board
Mt. View Sanitary District
P.O. Box 2757
Martinez, CA 94553
Mr. Rangel
Mr. David Contreras
Ms. Rosemary Corbin
President of the Board
Contra Costa Solid Waste Authority
114 Crest Avenue
Richmond, CA 94801
M s . Avon M. Wilson
Mr. Herb Moniz
Ad m i n istator
Central Contra Costa Solid Waste
Authority
2222 Camino Ramon
San Ramon, CA 94583
Mr. Moniz
ADS/Jacobs#3/HHWm obi l . Ist
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, California 94553-4392 (510) 689-3890
March 20, 1992
Mr. Mark Finucane, Director
Health Services Department
Contra Costa County
20 Alien Street
Martinez, CA 94553-3191
Dear Mr. Finucane:
ROGER J. DOLAN
General
Engineer
MENTON L ALM
Caoiset for the District
(510) 938-1430
JOYCE E. MURPHY
ecretary of the District
Yesterday, our Board discussed your March 6, 1992 letter. They are aware that this
proposal is being processed through the AB 939 review procedure and asked me to advise
you of their concern for certain elements of your proposal.
First, they want to be on record as opposing the concept that Central San would take
over the program at the end of the first 18 months. We recognize that there may be
some advantage to having an organization other than the County take over the program,
but suggest that either the County -wide JPA, or regional JPA's may be more suitable
future managers.
Our Board is also concerned about the future cost of the proposal because it does not
include a public hub/storage facility. They also believe that the environmental goals of
the program will not be met unless a small quantity generator program is available in the
County. If such a program is to be publicly managed, the Board believes that it should
be consolidated into the HHW program to eliminate the administrative burden of a
separate program overhead.
RJD:bI
cc: CCCSD Board of Directors
C:IWP511WPFILESIRJDIFINUCANE.LTR
Contra Costa Coun
The Board of Supervisors OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR
HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Tom Powers 1st District
Nancy C. Fanden. 2nd District
Robert 1. Schroder 3rd District
Sunne Wright McPeak 4th District
Tom Torlakson, 5th District
County Administrator
Phil Batchelor
County Administrator
March 6, 1992
Roger Dolan
General Manager & Chief Engineer
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553
Dear Mr. Dolan:
rk Finucane, Director
20 Allen Street
Martinez California 94553 3191
(510) 370 5003
(510) 370-5095 Fax
appreciated your meeting with me and my staff on Wednesday about the household
hazardous waste (HHW) collection program. As I mentioned at the meeting, my overriding
concern is that the program be implemented throughout the county and as soon as possible,
regardless of who operates it. Therefore, the Health Services Department would like to
propose the following compromise proposal:
The Health Services Department would implement a countywide mobile collection program,
to be operational in the spring of 1993. At the end of 18 months of operation, the county
would turn over the program to the Central Sanitary District. However, three issues would
need to be resolved prior to the transfer: (1) A permanent collection facility is constructed
and ready to receive HHW; (2) Contracts or agreements are in place to operate the
program in all three regions of the county; and (3) A well-developed, written plan for SQG
waste collection is in place, which includes a budget and addresses how it will integrate
current private sector efforts to collect such wastes.
We are recommending this compromise proposal because it is imperative that a mobile
collection program be implemented as soon as possible. Last fall, the Health Services
Department canceled collection days because we believed that the money could be better
utilized for a permanent program. We cannot delay any longer and continue to expect
residents to refrain from inappropriately disposing of their HHW.
Based on our discussions on Wednesday, your proposal currently includes a number of
uncertainties. First, it is dependent on a permanent facility -- either at Central Sanitary or
at Acme. Since that decision is still under discussion, implementation of the program could
be delayed. Second, Central Sanitary is not prepared at this time to collect HHW
countywide, which we believe is an essential requirement of any program. Third, a number
Me -r trees Me ' oriai Hospital & Clinics • Pub lc Health • Menta, Hea tr • Substance At..xe • EnoronmentaI Hea t1-
• Contra Costa Health Plan • Emergency Medical Ser,, cex • Home Heart' Agency • Ge• atr•cs
of policy and budgetary issues regarding SQG remain to be worked out. The proposed
compromise would provide you with the time to resolve these three issues without needlessly
delaying the program.
It is our intention to make this proposal to the Public Information Committee of the AB 939
Local Task Force at their March 13, 1992 meeting.
Sincerely,
Mark Finucane, Dfrector
Health Services Department
MF:BM:no
cc: Board of Supervisors
Phil Batchelor
Paul Morsen
Sue Rainey
Robin Bedell -Waite
Barbara Masters
Tim Potter
William B. Walker, M.I.