Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA BACKUP 03-07-91
.
Centre.. :ontra Costa Sanitar) ..listrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 8
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
March 7, 1991
NO.
3.
HEARINGS a.
SUBJECT
HOLD A HEARING AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY
FOR THE PURPOSE OF INITIATING ACQUISITION OF
PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS BY EMINENT DOMAIN FOR THE
ARLENE DRIVE SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, DP 4539
DATE
March 4, 1991
TYPE OF ACTION
CONDUCT HEARING
AUTHORIZE RESOLUTION
SUBMITTED BYTad J. Pilecki
Senior Engineer
INITIATING DEPT/cengineering Department!
Engineering Division
ISSUE: A hearing must be conducted and a resolution of necessity must be adopted prior
to initiating acquisition of public sewer easements by eminent domain.
BACKGROUND: The Arlene Drive Sewer Improvement Project, District Project No. 4539,
consists of replacing approximately 3,200 feet of existing 6- and 8-inch sewer mains in
Arlene Drive between Newell Avenue and Orchard Lane in Walnut Creek. These existing
sewers have insufficient capacity under wet weather conditions and have numerous
maintenance problems. Exhibit A shows the proposed sewer alignment. Staff will provide
a brief presentation to the Board of Directors on the project.
To construct the proposed Arlene Drive sewer improvements, permanent and temporary
easements are needed across five properties. Three of these easements have already been
acquired. The District has been negotiating with the remaining owners, Mr. and Mrs. Morris
and Mr. and Mrs. Batts), but has been unable to reach an agreement to date. Appraisals of
the permanent and temporary easements have been performed for both properties, including
the costs of any improvement replacement.
The District made an initial offer of $8,255 to Mr. and Mrs. Morris for the purchase of the
permanent and temporary easements across their property. Mr. and Mrs. Morris felt that the
issue of landscape improvements was not adequately addressed and requested the District
to re-evaluate its appraisal. Additionally, Mr. and Mrs. Morris wanted to extensively modify
the District's standard Grant of Easement conditions. The District re-evaluated its original
offer and hired a landscape firm to review the compensation for landscape damages. Staff
also tried to address Mr. and Mrs. Morris' concerns with respect to the Grant of Easement
conditions. Based on this re-evaluation, the District revised its position and made an offer
in the amount of $14,248 to compromise the dispute. To date, Mr. and Mrs. Morris have
not accepted the District's latest offer and have requested to address the Board of Directors
during the Public Hearing.
The District has also made an offer of $1,542 to Mr. and Mrs. Batts, which the District's
appraisal reflects as the fair market value for the purchase of the permanent and temporary
easement across their property. Mr. and Mrs. Batts have requested that the District restore
TJP
DRW
RAB
KLA
L
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED F R BOARD ACTION
j)~
P4Jf3
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
1302A.9/85
SUBJECT
HOLD A HEARING AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY
FOR THE PURPOSE OF INITIATING ACQUISITION OF
PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS BY EMINENT DOMAIN FOR THE
ARLENE DRIVE SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, DP 4539
POSITION PAPER
PAGE 2 OF
DATE
February 26, 1991
their landscape to its preconstruction condition in lieu of compensation for damages to the
landscape. Restoring landscape and improvements to the preconstruction condition is a
standard District practice.
Staff feels that the latest offer of $1,542 made to Mr. and Mrs. Batts reflects the fair market
value of the land and improvements. The offer of $14,248 to Mr. and Mrs. Morris is in
excess of the District's fair market value appraisal of $8,255 and was made to compromise
the dispute. Prior to initiating condemnation, the District must conduct a hearing to receive
input from the property owners and other affected interests. Property owners have been
notified at least 15 days in advance of the hearing, as required by California Code Civil
Procedure Section 1245.235.
RECOMMENDATION: Conduct a hearing to receive input from property owners on the
following issues:
1. whether public interest and necessity require the project;
2. whether the project is planned or located in the manner that will be most
compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; and
3. whether the property rights sought to be acquired are necessary for the project.
After the conclusion of the hearing, adopt the attached Resolution of Necessity to acquire
permanent and temporary sewer easements by eminent domain for the Arlene Drive Sewer
Improvement Project, District Project No. 4539.
13026-9/85
- .'-~-_._"-'---'-'-._--'--'--"""'--'."---""'" ....---,..-.-.---. --~~--"-",._._---_._-_._"..__""~_.~_____.._..__._....... _...._..".___..._~......"._.._.d__.._.__..,.._.,.,.>_.,__...._,_._.._,..____,,_...____~_.._
1622 Orchard Lane
Walnut Creek, CA 94595
March 5, 1991
Secretary of the District
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5919 Imhoff Place
Martinez, C A 94553
RE: Our letter, dated February 24, 1991 - Request
to be heard at March 7 Board of Directors meeting
Dear Sir:
Based upon a negotiated settlement on the matter of the Arlene Drive
Sewer Upgrade Project, and its affect upon our property, there is no
need for us to speak to the Board of Directors at the March 7 meeting.
With this letter, we hereby withdraw our request to so speak.
Your(:,~IYll
~ ~'v~
G. Scott Mor ris
~~
Laura J. Morris
lN~~~U~~[j
fEB 2 5 1991
CCCSO
l:''''''!''.''"!'' ^ ~'f .I'\r:.,....l! ...~I"'"
1622 Orchard Lane
Walnut Creek, CA 94595
February 24, 1991
Secretary of the District
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5lU9 Imhoff Place
Martinez, C A 94553
Dear Sir:
We wish to be heard at the Board of Directors meeting on Thursday,
March 7, 1991, on the matter of Resolution of Necessity being brought
before you.
Yours~~~_l_ ,
~/~J I~
~o~
Laura J. Morris
EXHIBIT A
I/'
DP 4539 ARLENE DR.
SEWER IMPROVEMENT
z:se .'VC"X.5"
T W
E N
2 1505
.. 1515
,..."
---
1517
/
'~$O~' a:
0
,.>>,,.,
15Z5
I
'~D~'
,,,ov
1529
" /5JJ
",..u
~::::
!:e~
PROPOSED
,.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION
OF A PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT FOR SEWER LINE PURPOSES
WHEREAS, Pursuant to the State of California Health and Safety Code Sections 6512
and 6514, and Part 3 Title 7, of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District is empowered to acquire sewer easements for public use, to wit, sewer
line purposes.
WHEREAS, the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District has identified the need to
acquire permanent and temporary public sewer easements more particularly described in
Attachment" A," attached hereto for said purposes. Said easements are located within
an incorporated area of the City of Walnut Creek, County of Contra Costa, State of
California.
WHEREAS, on the 19th day of February 1991, the District gave notice required by
law of the hearing on this Resolution.
WHEREAS, written requests to appear and be heard were received from:
WHEREAS, due consideration of all oral and documentary evidence has been taken.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary
District, by vote of at least two thirds of its members, does FIND AND RESOLVE as
follows:
1 . The public interest and necessity require the project for which said public sewer
easements are to be acquired.
2. The proposed project is planned and located in the manner which will be most
compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; and
3. Said public sewer easements are necessary for the proposed project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT:
The Counsel for Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, Kenton L. Aim, is hereby
authorized and empowered:
To acquire in the District's name, public sewer easements by condemnation;
To prepare and prosecute in the District's name, such proceedings in the proper court
as are necessary for such acquisition; and
To deposit the probable amount of compensation, based on an appraisal, and to apply
to said court for an order permitting the District to take immediate possession and use
said sewer easements for said public uses and purposes.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of March 1991, by the District Board of
Directors of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Members:
Members:
Members:
President of the District Board of the
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District,
County of Contra Costa, State of California
COUNTERSIGNED:
Secretary of the Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District, County of Contra Costa,
State of California
Approved as to form:
District Counsel
A IT ACHMENT . A.
PROPERTY AND EASEMENT DESCRIPTIONS
SA TIS PROPERTY
Property DescriPtion
That real property situated in the County of Contra Costa, State of California, described
as follows:
Parcel "A," as shown on the Parcel Map (M.S. 118-74) filed April 25, 1975, in
Book 37 of Parcel Maps, page 34, Contra Costa County Records.
PERMANENT SEWER EASEMENT DESCRIPTION:
A strip of land ten (10) feet in width lying within Parcel A, as said parcel is shown on that
certain Parcel Map recorded April 25, 1975, in the office of the Recorder of Contra Costa
County, in Book 37 of Parcel Maps, at page 34, the centerline of which is described as
follows:
Beginning at a point on the North line of said Parcel A, distant thereon South 89049'30"
West (South 89058'23" West - map bearing) 21.32 feet from the Northeast corner
thereof; thence, from said point of beginning, South 7033'37" West, 9.32 feet; thence
from a tangent which bears South 12049'44" East, Southerly along a curve concave to
the West, having a radius of 786.17 feet, a central angle of 2039'25", an arc distance
of 36.46 feet to a point on the Southeasterly line of said Parcel A, distant theron, South
42011 '33" West, 24.42 feet from the Southeast corner of said Parcel A.
The sidelines of said ten (10) feet in width strip of land to be lengthened or shortened to
extend entirely across said Parcel A.
Bearings are based upon the California State Coordinate System, Zone II.
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT DESCRiPTION
A strip of land ten (10) feet in width lying within Parcel A paralleling the west side of the
permanent easement described above. A strip of land encompassing the entire portion
of said Parcel B, lying east of the permanent easement described above extending to the
east property line.
.
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 5
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
March 7,1991
NO.
4.
CONSENT CALENDAR a.
SUBJECT
SET PUBLIC HEARING DATE TO ADOPT REVISED SOURCE
CONTROL ORDINANCE
DATE
March 1, 1991
TYPE OF ACTION
SET PUBUC HEARING
DATE
SUBMITTED BY
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV
Barton L. Brandenburg, Associate Engineer
Engineering Department/Planning Division
ISSUE: A public hearing is required prior to the adoption of a revised Source Control Ordinance.
BACKGROUND: The existing Source Control Ordinance was adopted on August 27, 1981, and
needs to be revised to reflect new regulations and current circumstances. Attachment A
summarizes the major proposed revisions to the ordinance.
Since 1989, the EPA has focused considerable attention on enforcement of the pretreatment
regulations. To respond, a streamlined enforcement procedure has been proposed by staff. The
EPA and Regional Water Quality Control Board are recommending that treatment facilities
encourage waste minimization and pollution prevention. Controlling the wastes from some
commercial establishments is anticipated as part of an overall waste minimization effort. The
revised ordinance improves and streamlines the permitting system to deal with smaller
businesses.
To allow staff to efficiently administrate an expanded program, EPA now requires that the
District's local limits for sewer discharge be technically based. To comply with this requirement,
staff has reviewed each limit through a process which identifies the maximum concentration
which could safely be discharged by industrial users. This process takes into account NPDES
permit limits, protection of the plant against upset, and prevention of sludge/ash contamination.
The current and proposed limits are shown in Table 1.
This position paper is transmitted at this time for Board information. The proposed Source
Control Ordinance will be distributed to the Board in the March 21, 1991 agenda packet. At the
public hearing, staff will discuss the changes which are proposed to be made to the existing
Source Control ordinance and be available to respond to Board and public comments.
The proposed ordinance has been sent to 40 existing and potentially new permitted industries.
In addition, an article was published in the Contra Costa Times which summarized the major
changes. A workshop for industries and small business has been scheduled for March 13, 1991,
so staff can present the proposed changes to affected users and respond to questions. The
proposed ordinance is available at the office of the Secretary of the District for the public to
view.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
INITIATING DEPT./DIV. ptt} /
/ /
~"'6 ,TMK- , i~t
1302A-9/85 BLB JMK RAB KLA
SUBJECT
POSITION PAPER
SET PUBLIC HEARING DATE TO ADOPT REVISED SOURCE
CONTROL ORDINANCE
PAGE
DATE
2 OF 5
March 1, 1991
RECOMMENDATION: Establish March 21, 1991, as the date for the public hearing on the
proposed Source Control Ordinances and authorize District staff to publish a notice of the public
hearing.
13028-9/85
ATTACHMENT A
This attachment presents a summary of the major proposed changes to the Source
Control Ordinance.
1. The "Purpose" section was rewritten to provide a broader scope of direction for
the ordinance. This was done in order to provide the greatest possible flexibility
for staff administrative actions in carrying out the precepts of the District's Source
Control Program.
2. The "Definition" section was expanded to include substantial additional definitions.
3. The issuance of Wastewater Discharge Permits is defined to be ministerial;
therefore, not requiring Board action.
4. The sections related to permissible discharges and discharge prohibitions were
expanded to clearly state that the ordinance applies to all users of the District's
system, whether permitted or not. Additional language was also added to define
and prohibit sludge discharges and interference and pass-through.
5. The new ordinance establishes four distinct classes of industrial users and the
responsibilities of each class. These classes of industrial users are:
Class I Industrial User: This class includes the user's of District facilities
which require maximum control of their discharge through a permit contract
(e.g., GSF Energy, Acme Fill Leachate) and discharge standards which may
be more stringent than local or categorical standards. Acceptance of
discharges from a Class I industrial user requires Board action.
Class II Industrial User: This class includes all Significant Industrial users
which are required to have a standard Wastewater Discharge Permit for
periodic monitoring and compliance.
Class III Industrial User: This class includes all commercial and industrial
facilities which may require some sort of oversight by the District based on
the materials used at the facility and/or the potential for accidental
discharge of these materials. These facilities would typically fall below the
level of attention given to the Class I or Class" Industrial Users. Examples
of potential Class III industrial users are dry cleaners, one-hour photo labs,
and auto repair facilities, etc.
Class IV Industrial User: This class includes all non-domestic users which
do not fall under the definitions of the classes referenced above. The users
of this class would generally not be required to have a Wastewater
Discharge Permit.
6. All sampling and analysis reports submitted by industrial users must include a
certified statement of all reporting, sampling requirements, and protocols.
7. The "Enforcement" section describes the enforcement actions available to the
District, and clarifies that the enforcement alternatives could be cumulative. The
Order to Show Cause hearing has been redrafted to provide a hearing only when
warranted by the alledged violation.
8. A noncompliance fee schedule is proposed which would administratively impose
fines for limit violations. The minimum fee automatically escalates from $300 for
a minor one-time violation to $2,000 for severe and recurring violations.
9. The District would have improved rights to revoke or to terminate a Wastewater
Discharge Permit and service.
10. The District's Waste Hauler Program is incorporated into the ordinance.
11. The District's grease trap and interceptor program is incorporated into the
ordinance.
TABLE 1
RECOMMENDED SEWER DISCHARGE LIMITS
Pollutant Current limits Recommended limits
(mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/l)
Antimony 5.0
Arsenic 2.0 2.0
Cadmium 1.0 0.3
Chromium 2.0 1.5
Copper 5.0 5.0
Lead 2.0 2.0
Mercury 0.05 0.05
Nickel 5.0 3.0
Selenium 0.3
Silver 1.0 1.0
Thallium 1.5
Zinc 5.0 5.0
Cyanide 5.0 1.5
Phenol 10.0 10.0
pH 5.5 5.5-12.5
Oil and Grease
Mineral 100
Animal 300
Vegetable 300
Total Toxic Organics 2.1
Total Identifiable 0.5 0.5
Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
.
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 1
POSITION PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
March 7, 1991
NO.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR b.
SUBJECT
DATE
RECEIVE THE DRAFT FISCAL YEAR 1 991-92 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT BUDGET 1991 TEN-YEAR CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND ESTABLISH APRIL 4, 1991,
AT 3 P.M. AS THE DATE AND TIME FOR A PUBLIC HEARING
M
T'1U:~V~~IB/CIP
ESTABLISH PUBLIC
HEARING DATE
SUBM,ITTED BJY M .
.Jonn . ercuno
Administrative Analyst
INITIATJl'JG QEPT/D)V
t:nglneenng Department!
Planning Division
ISSUE: The District's draft Fiscal Year 1991-92 Capital Improvement Budget (CIB)/1991
Ten-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) has been prepared by staff and is ready for Board
review. A date and time for a public hearing to receive comments on the document should
be established.
BACKGROUND: The Fiscal Year 1991-92 Capital Improvement Budget will establish near-
term project priorities and authorize budgets for the Treatment Plant, Collection System, and
General Improvements Programs. Detailed information for projects that are anticipated to
be active in Fiscal Year 1991-92 is presented in the Capital Improvement Budget document.
The 1991 Ten-Year Capital Improvement Plan will provide the basis for policy decisions
concerning the District's Capital Improvement Program and management of the Sewer
Construction Fund. The Capital Improvement Plan also serves as the framework for fee
analysis.
On February 5 and 13, 1991, the Capital Projects Committee met with District staff to
review the draft Capital Improvement Budget/Capital Improvement Plan. The Committee has
approved the document for submission to the full Board. A workshop is scheduled at the
March 21, 1991 Board meeting to discuss the Capital Improvement Budget/Capital
Improvement Plan.
It is appropriate to receive comments in a formal public hearing prior to consideration of the
Capital Improvement Budget/Capital Improvement Plan for approval. This public hearing has
been tentatively scheduled for April 4, 1991, at 3 p.m.
RECOMMENDATION: Receive the draft Fiscal Year 1991-92 Capital Improvement
Budget!1991 Capital Improvement Plan for review. Establish April 4, 1991, at 3 p.m., as
the date and time for a public hearing to receive comments on the draft CIB/CIP.
, 302A-9/85
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
INITIATING DEPT.iDIV.
J"^~
.
Centra =ontra Costa Sanitar~ ..listrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF
1
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
March 7, 1991
NO.
4.
CONSENT CALENDAR c.
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZE ATTENDANCE OF CHEMIST I AT THE AMERICAN
CHEMICAL SOCIETY'S LABORATORY SAFETY AND HEALTH
COURSE AND APPROVE OVEREXPENDING OF $1,100 IN THE
PLANT OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT TRAINING BUDGET
DATE
March 4, 1991
TYPE OF ACTION
AUTHORIZE
ATTENDANCE
SUBMITTED BY
Charles W. Batts,
Plant 0 erations De artment Mana er
INITIA TING DEPT.lDIV
Plant Operations Department
ISSUE: Approval by the Board of Directors is required for attendance at an unbudgeted training
course which exceeds a tuition cOst of $500.
BACKGROUND: Among the many new safety requirements, the California Occupational Safety
and Health Administration (Cal/OSHA) has recently issued new regulations for laboratory safety
and health which call for development of a "Chemical Hygiene Plan" for all laboratories, including
the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) laboratory. The plan must cover a number of
laboratory safety and health-related issues.
In response to these new regulations, the American Chemical Society is offering a training course
in San Francisco from May 29-31, 1 991. The course focuses on the causes of accidents, health
hazards of chemicals, laboratory protective equipment, ventilation, and measures for prevention of
fires, personal injury, or health impairment. Additionally, the course will teach the participants how
to develop and implement a "Chemical Hygiene Plan," as well as explain the codes of standards
governing safety and health in laboratories.
Susan Hasselwander, Chemist I, is the current Laboratory Safety Coordinator and will assist the
Laboratory Superintendent designated as the Chemical Hygiene Officer. The laboratory staff is
also working with an architectural consultant on a project where a number of safety-related issues
need to be resolved. In this effort the course will be very timely and useful.
The total cost of the training course will be approximately $1,100, which includes $975 in course
fees. Since the course was only recently announced, the cost and availability of the training
course were not included in the 1990-91 Operations and Maintenance budget. This course will
exceed the Plant Operations Department's Technical Training, Conferences, and Meetings budget
by about $1,100.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the attendance of Susan Hasselwander, Chemist I, at the
American Chemical Society's Laboratory and Safety Health Training Course on May 29-31, 1991,
in San Francisco at a cost of approximately $1,100.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
1302A-9/85
.
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
March 7, 1991
NO.
5.
ENGINEERING a.
SUBJECT
DATE
AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER
TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH JAMES M.
MONTGOMERY ENGINEERS FOR PREPARATION OF THE
DISINFECTION FACILITIES PLAN (DP 20100)
TYPE OF ACTION
AUTHORIZE AGREEMENT
SUBIj.1ITTED B'(
Lynne I. Putnam
Senior Engineer
INITIATWG QEPT /DJV
t:nglneenng Department
Planning Division
ISSUE: Board authorization is required for the General Manager-Chief Engineer to execute
professional services agreements for more than $50,000.
BACKGROUND: The District currently disinfects secondary effluent by injecting chlorine into
the upstream end of the outfall and utilizing a portion of the outfall to achieve adequate
chlorine contact time. The effluent is then dechlorinated by the addition of sulfur dioxide.
The District's NPDES permit allows no chlorine residual and 240 MPN of total coliform in the
final effluent.
The Secondary Facilities Staging Plan identified the disinfection facilities as the first item of
work needed to upgrade the secondary treatment train. The two key issues which were
identified in the staging plan were: 1) recurrent violations of permit requirements for both
chlorine residual and coliform, and 2) the outfall does not provide adequate chlorine contact
time and sulfur dioxide dose response time for the District to consistantly meet the permit
requirements. The chlorination/dechlorination process is not consistently meeting permit
requirements, and since achieving consistent permit compliance does not appear possible
with existing facilities, the Disinfection Facilities Plan was initiated.
Recent regulatory changes have also raised the priority of this project. The Uniform Fire
Code (UFC) was recently upgraded to address storage and use of toxic chemicals. The
District has received communication from the Contra Costa County Consolidated Fire District
that the chlorine and sulfur dioxide storage and feed facilities may be affected by the revised
sections of the UFC. Although the applicability of the revised provisions of the UFC is
uncertain at this time, regulatory and safety concerns may dictate substantial
chlorination/dechlorination system modifications up to, and possibly including, complete
containment with chemical scrubbing. Recent amendments to the Clean Air Act have
targeted the prevention of accidental releases of toxic chemicals. This legislation has
required the EPA to issue regulations by November 1992. The new requirements may be
very costly and could result in a decision to abandon gaseous chlorine as a disinfection
agent.
1302A-9/85 ~
RAB
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
JMt-
1t1^~
H1fJ
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
---,------,. ._---_.,--,..~~-- _._-_._._-,-_._---_.._~.._-,-~._,.._-,.~.__.._------~_.,._."-_._"...._"-_...__..~..~."._~.".".,._~-_.~....,...._,~-_.". _..,--'"-,~.-._--_.- - ._,-_._."-,~..-".._-------_._-_.__._----,--,,,---,....-...--.-"...-"'.- ..
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER
TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH JAMES M.
MONTGOMERY ENGINEERS FOR PREPARATION OF THE
DISINFECTION FACILITIES PLAN (DP 20100)
POSITION PAPER
PAGE 2 OF 3
R,t~fch 4, 1991
Given the implications of the new safety requirements and other future toxics requirements
and the difficulties of obtaining permit compliance with the existing disinfection system, it
is desirable to test alternative disinfection technologies (such as ultraviolet and ozone) that
have not been considered previously due to cost. A significant portion of the
Disinfection Facilities Plan cost is committed to bench-scale testing of chlorine, ozone, and,
possibly, ultraviolet disinfection methods to determine the operational parameters (including
safety) and complete costs of each alternative. Recent data has indicated that the District
uses significantly more chlorine for disinfection than similar plants. One purpose of the
investigation will be to discover why the chlorine demand is so high and to determine what
changes are needed to decrease the demand. The results of the bench-scale testing will be
used to develop the recommendations in the Disinfection Facilities Plan.
The facilities planning effort will also include evaluation of the capacity of existing facilities,
identification of near-term improvements to improve the disinfection process, and address
safety concerns within a two- to three-year time frame, review and identification of long-
term regulatory requirements, identification of alternative disinfection processes, and
recommendations for full-scale follow-up testing, if needed.
The Disinfection Facilities Plan Report will describe the selected alternatives for disinfection
with a comparison based on cost, operations and maintenance implications, safety,
reliability, regulatory impacts (including CEOA), and ultimate site layout. The Facilities Plan
will include recommendations for phasing and project funding. A decision on appropriate
CEOA action will be made upon completion of the facilities plan.
James M. Montgomery Engineers (JMM) was selected from five engineering firms, four of
whom responded to a request for proposals (RFP) issued in early January 1991. A review
panel made up of staff members from the Engineering and Plant Operations departments
selected James M. Montgomery Engineers after reviewing written and oral proposals. The
selection was based on the firm's approach to work, experience, and expertise of proposed
project team. A cost times multiplier agreement has been negotiated with JMM with a cost
ceiling of $315,000. A breakdown of this total is included in Attachment 1. The
Disinfection Facilities Plan is a portion of the Chlorination/Dechlorination Facilities
Improvement Project (DP 20100) which is included in the FY 1990-91 Capital Improvement
Budget on pages TP-7 through TP-9.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the General Manager-Chief Engineer to execute an
agreement with James M. Montgomery Engineers for $315,000 for preparation of the
Disinfection Facilities Plan (DP 20100).
13028-9/85
ATTACHMENT 1
TASK 1: Evaluate existing chlorination/dechlorination capacities,
establish disinfection demands, identify near-term
improvements $ 54,022
TASK 2: Evaluate impacts of regulatory and water reclamation
requirements 26,220
TASK 3: Evaluate alternative processes, perform bench-scale
testing, preliminary cost comparison 29,532
TASK 3.2: Bench-scale testing 90,046
TASK 4: Preliminary facilities planning 22,052
TASK 5: Pilot testing evaluation 4,568
TASK 6: Disinfection facilities plan 59,661
TASK 7: Project management; quality control 29.120
TOTAL $315,000
.
Centra. ;ontra Costa Sanitar) Jistrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 2
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
March 7, 1991
NO.
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER
TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO
ENGINEERS FOR FINAL DESIGN OF THE STANDBY POWER
FACILITIES
5. ENGINEERING b.
DATE
February 25, 1991
TYPE OF ACTION
AUTHORIZE
AGREEMENT
SUBMITTED BY
Donald E. Berger
Junior Engineer
INITIATING DEPT/DIV.
Engineering Department/
Engineering Division
ISSUE: Authorization by the Board of Directors is required for the General Manager-Chief
Engineer to execute professional service agreements for amounts greater than $50,000.
BACKGROUND: In January 1991, the Emergency Power Facility Study was completed as part
of the Headworks Facilities Expansion Project (DP 20069). The study recommended that an
on-site standby power facility be constructed to provide electrical power to the treatment plant
during a PG&E power outage. The study compared on-site standby power facilities with
reliability improvements to the existing PG&E electrical feed system. On-site standby power
was found to be more cost-effective and reliable.
The recommended standby power facility consists of two reciprocating diesel engine
generators, a building enclosure, and associated switchgear and electrical equipment necessary
to connect the generators to the existing plant electrical distribution system. Also
recommended is a load shedding system required to disconnect non-essential plant loads from
the plant electrical system during a PG&E power outage.
John Carollo Engineers (JCE) completed the study for this project, and based on their previous
performance and knowledge of the project, staff recommends that JCE provide the final design
services.
An agreement has been negotiated with JCE for final design services with a cost ceiling of
$249,335. The design services include preparation of plans and specifications and assistance
during the bidding period.
The preliminary estimate of the total project cost and construction cost is $3,460,000 and
$2,659,000, respectively. The power facility is included in the 1990-1991 Capital
Improvement Budget under the heading, "Headworks Facilities Expansion (DP 20069)", pages
TP-12 and TP-13.
The CEQA requirements for the standby power facilities were addressed in the Negative
Declaration prepared for the Headworks Facilities Expansion Project. This Negative Declaration
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
1302A-9/85
DEB
DJC
DRt.J
RAB
LAN
INldlNG DEP /DIV.
n;.e-
lJ~
/)f}fJ
-------------- -----------"-- --- ---------~---
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER
TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO
ENGINEERS FOR FINAL DESIGN OF THE STANDBY POWER
FACILITIES
POSITION PAPER
PAGE
DATE
2
OF
2_
February 25, 1991
was approved by the Board on December 21, 1989. A Notice of Determination has been filed
with the State of California and the County Clerk.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the General Manager-Chief Engineer to execute a Cost
Reimbursement Agreement with a cost ceiling of $249,335 with John Carollo Engineers for
final design services for the Standby Power Facilities.
13028-9/85
.
Centra. Contra Costa Sanitar~ .Jistrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 3
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
March 7, 1991
NO.
5.
ENGINEERING c.
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZE GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TO
ALLOCATE $74,000 FROM COLLECTION SYSTEM PROGRAM
CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT FOR SOUTH BROADWAY SEWER
RELOCATIONS PROJECT, DP 4826
DATE
March 4, 1 991
TYPE OF ACTION
ALLOCATE FUNDS
SUBMITTED BY
Andrew J. Antkowiak
Assistant Engineer
INITIA TING DEPT/DIV
Engineering Department
Engineering Division
ISSUE: Board of Directors' authorization is required for allocations from Capital Improvement
Budget program contingency accounts in amounts greater than $25,000.
BACKGROUND: The City of Walnut Creek is currently designing an extension of South
Broadway in the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way (SPRR R/W) between Newell Avenue
and Rudgear Road. This project will consist of a two-way street with soundwalls and
pedestrian trail. The soundwall on the east side of the SPRR R/W will impact the operation and
maintenance of the existing District's 1 O-inch sewer mains. See Attachment 2 for the location
of the project.
The existing 10-inch main was constructed over 40 years ago and most of its length is located
within 5-foot wide sewer easements along the SPRR R/W. The city proposes to build the
soundwall immediately east and adjacent to the District's easements. Access to the sewer
main, due to the close proximity of soundwall and narrow easement corridor, will be very
difficult. Therefore, it is appropriate to prepare a facilities plan to evaluate potential sewer
relocation routes and accommodate the soundwall construction without impacting the
District's sewer facilities. To fully evaluate potential design related problems, a preliminary
design will be prepared for the most cost-effective alternative. The total estimated cost for
the facilities planning and completion of preliminary design is $74,000. A breakdown of this
total is provided in Attachment 1.
After selection of the preferred routing alternative, the District will conduct an environmental
evaluation of the project. Depending on the route selected, the project may be exempt from
the California Environmental Ouality Act (CEOA) or may require a Negative Declaration or an
Environmental Impact Report. The appropriate CEOA document will be prepared by the District
or an outside consultant at that time.
Since this work was not anticipated , the project does not appear in the Capital Improvement
Budget. Therefore, Board authorization is needed to authorize the General Manager-Chief
Engineer to allocate the required funds to DP 4826.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the General Manager-Chief Engineer to allocate $74,000 to
the South Broadway Sewer Relocations Project, DP 4826, from the Collection System Program
Contingency Account.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
INITIATING DEPT/DIV.
gfI-
~fhJ
DRH
/){}13
RAB
1302A-9/85 AJA
Force Account
Engineering
Survey
Planning/CEQA
Consultants
ATTACHMENT 1
COLLECTION SYSTEM FACILITIES PLANNING
SOUTH BROADWAY SEWER RELOCATION
BREAKDOWN OF COSTS
John Carollo Engineers
Geotechnical Investigation
Analytical Surveys, Inc.
Contingencies @ 1 5 %
Total Funds Requested
EO/SPBROW A Y .AJA
March 4, 1991
$15,000.
5,000.
1,000.
35,000.
3,000.
5,000.
10,000.
$74,000.
Paqe 2 of 3
,
Page 3 of 3
G
/""\
PROPOSED SOUTH BROADWAY
SEWER RELOCATIONS DP 4826
ATTACHMENT
2
2523-9/U
.
Centra. ~ontra Costa Sanitar~ .Jistrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1
OF 2
POSITION PAPER
NO.
1
6. TREATMENT PLANT a.
DATE
March 1, 1991
TYPE OF ACTION
ACCEPTANCE OF
REPORT
SUBJECT
BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF THE 1990 SELF-MONITORING
PROGRAM REPORT
SUBMITTED BY
Charles W. Batts,
Plant 0 erations De artment Mana er
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Plant 0 erations De artment
ISSUE: The Central Contra Costa Sanitary District's Self-Monitoring Program annual
report for 1 990 has been prepared for submission to the California Regional Water
Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Section. This report is presented to the
Board at this time for its information and acceptance.
BACKGROUND: The treatment plant continued to meet all effluent requirements throughout the
year, with the exception of total coliform violations during two episodes, and one settleable solids
violation~ The reason for the coliform violations is not fully understood. In each case there were
no process upset conditions, and the chlorine dose and residual indicated that good effluent
disinfection should have occurred. Research was done on several potential causes but with no
clear cause and effect results. There were also 22 non-zero chlorine residual violations. However,
only six exceeded the Regional Water Quality Control Board's guideline concentrations. The
majority of these violations over the last several years was related to problems of process control.
Plant Operations Department staff is presently working on several projects to improve both the
residual detection instrumentation and computer dechlorination programs, and reduce future
violations.
The District performed routine monitoring of selected organic and metallic contaminants as
requested by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. In 1990, additional monitoring in terms of
both the frequency and the type of tests was added to the requirements of the District. The
results of these tests show that these contaminants were not detected in the treatment plant
effluent in any significant concentrations and met all National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit standards.
There was a total of 13,396 million gallons of wastewater treated for an average daily flow of
36.7 million gallons. This flow is about 2 percent less than 1989 due to the continuing dry
winters. The treatment plant operated throughout the year and produced an effluent with an
average BOD and total suspended solids concentration of 7 mg/l and 9 mg/l, respectively. This is
markedly lower than our NPDES permit standards of 25/30 mg/1. The BOD and total suspended
solids removal efficiency for the plant averaged 96 and 95 percent, respectively.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
1302A-9/B5
SUBJECT
POSITION PAPER
BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF THE 1990 SELF-MONITORING
PROGRAM REPORT
PAGE 2 OF 2
DATE
March 1, 1991
Solids disposal during this year involved the incineration of dewatered sludge in the District's
multiple-hearth furnaces. Approximately 3,139 tons of furnace ash was disposed of by hauling to
Colusa and Redwood Sanitary Landfills. During this period, the District instituted the Chemfix
process for dust control at both the plant and landfill sites and reintroduced lime addition into the
process to ensure compliance with the California Department of Health Services copper standard.
This material met the regulatory criteria for off-site disposal.
Upon acceptance of this report by the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Board of Directors,
the 1990 Annual Self-Monitoring Report will be submitted to the California Regional Water Quality
Control Board.
RECOMMENDATION: Acceptance of the 1990 Annual Self-Monitoring Program Report.
--------.
13028-9/85
.
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1
OF 4
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
March 7, 1991
NO.
9.
BUDGET & FINANCE a.
March 4, 1991
SUBJECT
DATE
CONSIDER ADDITIONAL REQUEST FOR SEWER SERVICE
CHARGE REFUND BY CREEKSIDE GLEN APARTMENTS
TYPE OF ACTION
CONSIDER REFUND
REQUEST
SUBMITTED BY
Steve Elsberry, Senior Accountant/
INITIATING DEPT/DIV
Administrative/Finance & Accounting
ISSUE: A request has been received from the owners of the Creekside Glen Apartments in
Walnut Creek for an additional refund of Sewer Service Charges, as a result of recent legislation.
BACKGROUND: In October 1990, Mr. John Petrak, representing the owners of Creekside Glen
Apartments in Walnut Creek, requested a refund of $30,460 in overpaid Sewer Service Charges.
The overpayment was the result of this commercial account being established with an incorrect
number of units in 1976-1977, the first year that the Sewer Service Charge was implemented.
The account was set-up with 172 units, while the apartment complex actually has 152 units.
A summary of the overpayment since inception of the Sewer Service Charge is shown on
Attachment I.
In November 1990, in accordance with current District policy, the Board approved a refund of
$9,440 for the previous four years of overpayment, pending verification by District staff of the
actual number of units. The verification was completed on November 5, 1990 and a refund
check was subsequently issued. At the time of the Board approval, District Counsel indicated
that pending legislation could affect the current District policy of limiting refunds to four prior
years. Mr. Petrak was advised that the Board would consider a resubmittal of a refund request
after January 1, 1991.
Senate Bill 1 821, whose provisions became effective January 1, 1 991, is a conglomeration of
various changes to operating procedures, fees and refunds, and revenue sharing for local
agencies. The legislation has twelve sections, including many special interest sections applicable
to only one or two agencies. Section Three requires local agencies to refund by July 1, 1991,
sewer service fees collected for which no services were delivered. An ambiguity exists in the
legislation in that it seems intended to apply to homeowners, or "persons," who paid the sewer
service fees, and not to commercial payers such as the owners of the Creekside Glen
Apartments. District Counsel will pursue clarification of this ambiguity through the California
Association of Sanitation Agencies. The pertinent Section Three of the legislation is presented
in its entirety as Attachment II.
On January 4, 1991, Mr. Petrak resubmitted a request for a refund of $21,020, representing the
balance of the original request. District staff recommends that payment of $21,020 be made
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
b~'
/f '
\ ./1
KLA
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED Fa BOARD ACTION
1302A-9/85
SE
SUBJECT
CONSIDER ADDITIONAL REQUEST FOR SEWER SERVICE
CHARGE REFUND BY CREEKSIDE GLEN APARTMENTS
POSITION PAPER
PAGE 2
DATE
OF 4
March 4, 1991
by July 1, 1991, or earlier, if it is determined by District Counsel that the legislation includes
sewer service charge overpayments by commercial, as well as, residential payers.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve an additional refund of Sewer Service Charges to Creekside Glen
Apartments in the amount of $21,020 for the ten fiscal years 1976-1977 to 1985-1986 by July
1, 1 991, or earlier, if it is determined by District Counsel that SB 1821 includes overpayments
by nonresidential payers.
130?8 9,8S
ATTACHMENT I
CREEKSIDE GLEN APARTMENTS
SUMMARY OF SEWER SERVICE CHARGE PAYMENTS
FISCAL YEARS 1976-1977 TO 1989-1990
Sewer Service Charge
Fiscal Paid Correct Overpayment
Year (172 Units) (152 Units) (20 Units)
1989-1990 $ 21,328 18,848 2,480
1988-1989 19,952 17,632 2,320
1987-1988 19,952 17,632 2,320
1986-1987 19.952 17.632 2.320
$ 81. 1 84 71. 744 9.440
1985-1986 21,328 18,848 2,480
1 984-1985 22, 188 19,608 2,580
1 983-1984 21,328 18,848 2,480
1982-1983 21,328 18,848 2,480
1 981-1 982 21,328 18,848 2,480
1980-1981 18,060 15,960 2, 1 00
1979-1980 15,996 14,136 1,860
1978-1979 13,416 11,856 1,560
1977-1978 13,416 11,856 1,560
1976-1977 12.384 10.944 1 .440
$180.772 159.752 21.020
$261.956 231 .496 $30.460
ADS/P.P#3/Creeksid.pp
Refunded in November
1990
Balance to be refunded
Total Refund
Attachment II
SENATE BILL 1821
SECTION THREE EXTRACT
SEC 3. (a) By July 1, 1991, local agencies shall refund any sewer service fees collected for
which no services were delivered.
(b) Any fees collected by a local agency from any person for which no service has been
provided shall be refunded in accordance with subdivisions (c) and (d).
(c) In cases where a person paid fees as described in subdivision (a) and is still residing at the
same location, it shall be the responsibility of the local agency to return fees in their entirety,
regardless of the amount of time the fees were wrongly collected. For the. purposes of this
section, if the exact amount of the charges is not readily available, the amount of the refund may
be calculated by averaging the rates paid by payers in the same classification during the time
period in which the fees were collected.
(d) In cases where a person paid fees as described in subdivision (a) but is not still residing at
the same location, the payer of the fees may make a claim for a refund to the agency collecting
the fees. No statute of limitations as to those claims shall apply.
ADS/PP#3/Creeksid. pp
.
Central Contra Costa Sanitary Oistrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
POSITION
BOARD MEETING OF
March 7,1991
PAPER
t:'b'fJSIDER FEE IMPOSED BY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
TO DEFRAY PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSES PURSUANT TO SB 2557
SUBMITTED BY
Walter Funasaki, Finance Officer
PAGE 1 OF 4
NO.
9.
BUDGET & FINANCE b.
March 4, 1 991
DATE
TYPE OF ACTION
CONSIDER NEW
COUNTY FEE
INITIATING DEPT /DIV
Administrative/Finance & Accounting
ISSUE: On January 29, 1991, Contra Costa County billed the District $111,542.89 for property
tax administrative expenses which it considers to be payable in full by February 28, 1991.
BACKGROUND: Senate Bill 2557 was passed in the closing hours of the 1990-1991 budget
deliberations of the Legislature. This legislation authorizes county government to assess school
districts, cities, and special districts an annual administrative fee for the assessment, collection,
and allocation of property taxes. The fee is to be determined by the County Auditor based on
the property tax administrative expenses incurred by the Assessor, Tax Collector and Auditor,
which are proportionately attributable to local jurisdictions. The property tax administrative fee
is to be based on the prior fiscal year's administrative expenses and billed to local jurisdictions
beginning in the 1 990-1 991 fiscal year.
The county is required to use the property tax administrative fee only to fund the actual
expenses of assessing, collecting, and allocating property taxes. The County Auditor is required
to report the amount of the administrative expenses and related overhead expenses to the Board
of Supervisors and any other jurisdiction that requests the information. A summary of the
property tax administrative expenses for 1989-1990 of $8,287,349, as prepared by the Contra
Costa County Auditor-Controller, is provided as Attachment I. The administrative fee billed to
the District of $111,542.89 was allocated on the basis of the ratio of property tax revenue
received by the District of $6,557,059 to total property tax revenue for all local jurisdictions of
$487,172,569, or 1.3459 percent.
The following is a summary of the apportionment of the property tax administrative expenses
by local jurisdictions:
General County Entities
$2,220,122
County Governed Special Districts
Autonomous Special Districts
Cities/City Special Districts
Redevelopment Agencies
School Districts
813,233
936,312
848,608
584,718
2,884,356
6.067 .227
$8.287 .349
INITIA T1NG DEPT.lDIV.
.'
~~4-~'
1302A-9/85 WN F
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
27%
10
11
10
7
~
73
100%
SUBJECT
POSITION PAPER
CONSIDER FEE IMPOSED BY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
TO DEFRAY PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSES PURSUANT TO SB 2557
PAGE 2
DATE
OF 4
March 4, 1991
SB 2557 also authorizes a county to impose a fee upon other local agencies or colleges or
universities for county expenses incurred in processing or booking persons arrested by employees
of other local agencies or colleges or universities and brought to county facilities for booking or
detention.
School districts have joined in a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the legislation. Some
cities in the County have indicated their intention to withhold payment.
As the Board was advised in the 1 990-1 991 Operations and Maintenance Budget Review for the
six months ended December 31, 1990, the Administrative Department is projected to be
$58,000 overexpended for the 1990-1991 fiscal year primarily due to inclusion of the
unanticipated $111,542.89 administrative fee in the department's projected expenses.
Two bills which have been introduced in the current session of the Legislature to repeal or amend
S8 2557 are described below:
Senate Bill 169, introduced by Senator Boatwright in the current legislative session on
January 14, 1991, seeks to repeal all of the provisions of SB 2557 which authorize
counties to impose fees upon local jurisdictions for property tax administrative expenses,
and booking and detention expenses. This legislation would replace the revenues to
counties from fees imposed on local jurisdictions with increased vehicle license fees,
wherein additional money collected by the Department of Motor Vehicles would be
deposited to the credit of the County Assistance Fund; the money in the County
Assistance Fund would be allocated to counties based on a formula to be determined by
the Legislature. SB 169 is intended to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
The California Association of Sanitation Agencies has taken a position in support of SB
169.
Senate Bill 203, introduced on January 18, 1991, by the sponsor of SB 2557, Senator
Kenneth Maddy, seeks to amend certain provisions of SB 2557, which Senator Maddy
believes did not achieve the intent of his original legislation. The changes sought by SB
203 which would affect the property tax administrative fee billed to the District are the
following:
· the property tax expense apportionment method is revised and would result
in a change in the amount of the property tax administrative fee for 1 990-
1991 billed to the District
· the property tax administrative fee is to be subtracted from the property tax
revenue allocated to each city, redevelopment agency, and special district
130?8 g,Wl
SUBJECT
CONSIDER FEE IMPOSED BY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
TO DEFRAY PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSES PURSUANT TO SB 2557
POSITION PAPER
PAGE 3
DATE
OF 4
March 4, 1991
and added to the property tax revenue allocated to the county; for 1990-
1 991 , the property tax administrative fee is to be subtracted from property
tax revenues after January 1, 1 991 .
The California Association of Sanitation Agencies is opposed to SB 203.
In view of the possibility that the basis for the property tax administrative fee may be voided,
or its method of collection significantly changed, by subsequent legislative action, District staff
seeks the guidance of the Board: on the one hand, the fee is based on an existing statute which
was duly enacted; on the other hand, legislation currently under active consideration may declare
the fee null and void,or result in revision to the fee amount and permit its subtraction by the
County from property tax proceeds.
RECOMMENDATION: Provide direction and guidance to District staff as to whether payment of
the 1990-1991 property tax administrative fee in the amount of $111,542.89 should be made.
110?8 9 BS
ATTACHMENT I
CONTI{A COSTA cOIm I Y
Properly lax Administration Fee per SB 2!J57
NOTE: Per Hevenue and Taxation Coc!p ~i97, tl](' property tux i)chllinistration fee to be
charged in the 1990-91 Fiscal Year shall be based on the 1989-90 property tax
related costs of the Assessor, Tax Collector and Auditor, including applicable
o v e r h e a d cas t s asp e I'm it t e d by fed e I' al C i I' c ul a r A - 8 7 s tan d a r d s .
Property Tax Related Costs, 1989-90 Fiscal Year
Assessor
Tax Ca11ectal'
Auditor
$7,614,304
1,499,833
____91 B ~}~_i~
T a ta 1
$10,032,895
Overhead Costs per Circuldr A-iJl, 19B9-90 Fiscal Yeal'
AssessOl'
Tax Collector
Auditor
$
563,944
102,114B
}~,327
Totil1
740,119
Less: Fees Heceived for 11n'pel'ly lilx I~()lilt('d Sel'vices, 19WJ-90
General County
Assessot'
Tax Collector
Aud itor
$1,685,12/
204,144
3110,535
___ 2~)5 -21152.
Totill
(2,4B5,665)
Net Property Tax Administrat.ion Costs,
1989-90 Fiscal Year
U~J~L~l:lQ ( 1 )
(1) The net property tax administration CllSts vii 11 l>(~ allocated on a pro-rata
basis to all entities receiving pnJperty tc3X n~venl/()s. Tlw allocation I'/ill
11(' lIlade in accordrnc(~ l'lith t.he guid(~lirH!s issued by tlll~ St.c:t(~ Controllel"c
('II iice, AccountilH; Standill'cb JI, flrocedIJl'(!S COlllllJittre.
S () 111'C(' : C () n tT il r: () 'j tile () 11'11 Y f\ tI d i I (),' - C () II L r' () I II>" I S (If r i l ('
I ?/?{J/C)()