HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA BACKUP 09-16-93
~ Central ~~~:~ g~~~R~~~baR1.Jistrict
PAGE 1 OF 3
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
September 16, 1993
NO.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR a.
DATE September 7, 1993
SUj\"'PP"ROVE AGREEMENT RELATING TO
REAL PROPERTY WITH JOHN R. TATUM,
JOB 91, DIABLO AREA
J{J:fp<J{6~~~EAL
PROPERTY AGREEMENT
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Engineering Department
Infrastructure Division
ISSUE: The property owner, John R. Tatum has requested that the District allow the
encroachment of a portion of his existing garage and a roof overhang of a new home addition
over a District sewer easement.
BACKGROUND: The District's sewer easement was created in 1959. The 6-inch diameter
vitrified clay pipe within the sewer easement was constructed many years earlier as a part of
the Diablo Public Utilities District. The encroachment of the garage over the easement has
existed for some time. The origin of the encroachment is unknown, but could predate the
District's easement.
The encroachment of the garage was first recognized when the owner's contractor brought
plans of the new home addition to the District for review as a part of the building permit
process. The rerouting of the existing sewer around the garage was evaluated and found to
be impractical due to the closeness of the existing home and the existence of mature trees.
The foundation of the new addition will be outside of the existing sewer easement. The roof
eaves of the new addition will overhang the existing easement by approximately 3 feet.
District staff has televised the existing sewer and has determined that it is in satisfactory
condition in the area of the existing garage and proposed roof eaves.
Staff has determined that the garage and eaves will not interfere with the present use of our
sewer. Mr. Tatum has cooperated with the District and has executed an agreement which has
been modified to include the right of the District to use a "no-dig" type of technology including
a pipe bursting technique if the sewer needs to be renovated in the future. The agreement
limits what may be installed in the easement in the future. The property owner accepts the
liability for any damages to the District's facilities related to the encroachment and for
additional costs to the District for maintenance, renovation, and/or replacement of the sewer
in the area of the encroachment. The property owner also holds the District free from all claims
and liability for injury to persons or to their property related to the encroachment. The property
owner agrees not to impede the District's access to the property. The agreement provides for
the District's emergency access.
This project (the proposed agreement) has been evaluated by staff and determined to be
exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEOA) under District CEOA Guidelines
Section 18.6, since it involves a minor alteration in land use limitations.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
DH
JSM
RAB
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
mID
VffD
--
1302A-9/85
SUBJECT
POSITION PAPER
APPROVE AGREEMENT RELATING TO
REAL PROPERTY WITH JOHN R. TATUM,
JOB 91, DIABLO AREA
PAGE
DATE
2
3
OF
September 7, 1993
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Agreement Relating to Real Property with John R. Tatum,
Job No. 91, and authorize the President of the Board of Directors and the Secretary of the
District to execute said agreement, and authorize the agreement to be recorded.
130?8 ~ RS
\o~
f\>~
~Q
3.5'
C\I
'P""
,~
,~
1~ 5' S.S.E.
12" PIERS I. I
~ 6" V.C.P.
SECTION THROUGH (4' DEEP)
ADDITION
300,..).)'
i~~
EXISTlNlJ IOESIOEHCE
"
i
--
AREA OF"
ENCROACHMENT'
~
!
\
\
._----....
"
Na.c. ----.
.;~~
~,~.
"'~~ ">-e - Cl1EEK
~il-
---
----
-
-,
, 17
" ./1
",
I 11
II .1
! I
/1
3:
,...
to
o
N
'll::
M
co
o
N
'll::
\)\~6\..O
ALAMEDA
REAL PROPERTY AGREEMENT
JOB 91
DIABLO AREA
~
Centra~ ~ontra Costa Sanitary Jistrict
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1
OF 2
POSITION PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
Se tember 16, 1993
NO.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR b.
DATE September 7, 1993
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZATION FOR P.A. 93-17 (ALAMO)
TO BE INCLUDED IN A FUTURE FORMAL
ANNEXATION TO THE DISTRICT
TYPE OF ACTION
ACCEPT ANNEXATION
FOR PROCESSING
SUBMITTED BY
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Dennis Hall, Associate Engineer
Engineering Dept./lnfrastructure Division
Parcel Area Owner I Address Remarks Lead
No. Parcel No. & Acreage Agency
93-1 7 Alamo Michael Rojansky Existing house with a CCCSD
(77E6) 109 La Sonoma Way failing septic system;
Alamo, CA 94507 owner wants to
198-112-011 (0.5AC) connect to the public
sewer system.
Project is exempt
from CEOA.
Samuel W. Grossman Existing house with a CCCSD
106 La Sonoma Way failing septic system;
Alamo, CA 94507 owner wants to
198-111-002 (0.5 AC) connect to the public
sewer system.
Project is exempt
from CEOA.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize P.A. 93-17 to be included in a future formal annexation.
I1)If
m
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
INITIATING DEPT/DIV.
1302A-9/85
DH
JSM
RAB
.
----J
/
"-
~
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
P.A.93-17
~
~ Central ~~~:~ g~~~R~~~ba~~ Jistrict
PAGE 1 OF 2
POSITION
PAPER
BOARD MEETING OF
September 16, 1993
NO.
ACCEPT THE CONTRACT WORK FOR OVERLOOK DRIVE SEWER
REPLACEMENT PROJECT, DP 4871, IN WALNUT CREEK,
AUTHORIZE FILING THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION
4. CONSENT CALENDAR c.
DATE September 7, 1993
TYPE OF Ae~ CONTRACT
WORK
SUBJECT
ISSUE: Construction has been completed on the Overlook Drive Sewer Replacement Project,
DP 4871, in Walnut Creek, and the work is now ready for acceptance.
BACKGROUND: The District was notified by the City of Walnut Creek in January 1992 that
Overlook Drive was to be reconstructed due to ground failures. Since the existing sewer was
in marginal condition and the road reconstruction work would jeopardize the pipe, the Board
of Directors approved the City's offer on April 2, 1992 to replace the sewer in conjunction with
the City's work. However, the City's project was later delayed due to funding and the City
requested the sewer work be removed from its project because of lack of funding and staff to
comply with the Joint Project Agreement. The District subsequently prepared the plans and
specifications and bid the project independently so that the new sewer will clear the future road
work by the City.
The project consisted of replacing approximately 1 ,300 feet of 8-inch main line sewer pipe with
2 new manholes and reconnecting 11 existing house laterals. See Attachment 1 for project
location.
On May 20, 1993, the Board of Directors authorized the award of a contract for construction
of the project to Rand E Construction Company, Inc., of Walnut Creek. The Notice to Proceed
was issued on June 17, 1 993, with a specified completion date of August 1, 1 993. The
contract completion date has been revised by change order to August 15, 1993, further time
extensions are pending. The contract work was substantially completed on September 2,
1993. The remaining work consists of minor punch items which do not affect the project
acceptance.
The total authorized budget for the project including the cost of engineering design, District
forces, and the contract work is $155,000. A detailed accounting of the project costs will be
provided to the Board at the time of project close out. It is appropriate to accept the contract
work at this time.
RECOMMENDATION: Accept the contract work for the construction of the Overlook Drive
Sewer Replacement Project, DP 4871, in Walnut Creek, and authorize the filing of the Notice
of Completion.
~
'1'/
fif;5
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV
1302A-9/85
TAT
HT
JSM
RAB
_.._____""_. .__,___.__...__._.____..___~_._..._____~__~__..._'_~_~ .__.._._.,"_'..., ,,___._...._.M__..___._._.._____M_.__ _____.-.-..n...._.._,_._,
) \
PROJECT LOCATION
Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District
~
OVERLOOK DRIVE
EXHIBI
SEWER REPLACEMENT
" A"
2523-1/5 -
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 3
NO.
SUBJECT
4. CONSENT CALENDAR d.
DATE
ADOPT A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE 1993-1994
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE
XIII B OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
Au ust 20 1 993
TYPE OF ACTION
ADOPT
APPROPRIATIONS
LIMIT
SUBMITTED BY
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Debbie Ratcliff, Controller
Administrative/Finance & Accounting
ISSUE: The Central Contra Costa Sanitary District is required to establish its appropriations limit
in accordance with Article XIII B of the California Constitution.
BACKGROUND: On August 19, 1993, the Board of Directors authorized posting a public notice
of the availability of documentation in support of the District's appropriations limit. As statutorily
required, the public notice was made at least 15 days prior to the September 16, 1993 Board
Meeting at which the adoption of the appropriations limit is recommended.
Formerly, the appropriations limit was increased annually by a factor comprised of the change
in population combined with either the change in California per capita personal income or the
Consumer Price Index, whichever was lower. As amended by Proposition 111 in 1990, the
Consumer Price Index was replaced by the percentage change in the local assessment roll from
the preceding year due to local nonresidential construction. The Board is to select between the
per capita personal income, or the change in the local assessment roll due to local nonresidential
construction, by a recorded vote. Last year the Board selected the change in the local
assessment roll, which was the larger of the two percentages, for the calculation of the 1992-
1993 appropriations limit. This approach allowed for a larger limit on the District's proceeds of
taxes.
The County Assessor has determined the nonresidential construction index for 1993-1994 to
be 10.1 percent. The California per capita personal income percentage change is 2.72. The
change in the local assessment roll of 10.1 percent is being used in the calculation of the 1993-
1994 appropriations limit, to allow for a larger limit on the District's proceeds of taxes.
The computation of the 1993-1994 appropriations limit by application of the California per capita
personal income and population percentage change factors to the 1986-1987 appropriations limit
adjusted from that year forward to 1990-1991, and the nonresidential construction index for
1991-1992 through 1993-1994, was provided at the August 19, 1993 Board Meeting. The
Sewer Construction Fund (Capital Fund) appropriations limit so computed is $16,366,166 for
the 1993-1994 fiscal year.
:/'0 /
~/~-c
RE~EWEDANDRECOMMENDEDFORBOARDAcnON
PM
SUBJECT
ADOPT A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE 1993-1994
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE
XIII B OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
PAGE 2
DATE
OF
3
August 20, 1993
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution establishing the Sewer Construction Fund
appropriations limit in the amount of $16,366,166 for the 1993-1994 fiscal year, in accordance
with Article XIII B of the California Constitution; select the change in the local assessment roll
due to local nonresidential construction, for use in computing the appropriations limit.
13028-7/91
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS
LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993-1994
WHEREAS, the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District is required under Article XIII B of
the State of California Constitution to establish and adopt an Appropriations Limit for each fiscal
year; and
WHEREAS, the District has determined the Appropriations Limit of its Sewer Construction
Fund (Capital Fund) for fiscal year 1993-1994 to be $16,366,166; and
WHEREAS, the selection of the alternative growth factor between the per capita personal
income or the change in the local assessment roll due to local nonresidential construction must
be made by recorded vote;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of the Central Contra
Costa Sanitary District does hereby adopt the Appropriations Limit for said Fund in the amount
of $16,366,166 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1994, based upon the selection of the
change in the local assessment roll due to local nonresidential construction.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of September 1993, by the District Board of the
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District by the following vote:
AYES: Members:
NOES: Members:
ABSENT: Members:
President of the Board of Directors
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
COUNTERSIGNED: County of Contra Costa, State of California
Secretary of Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District, County of Contra
Costa, State of California
Approved as to Form:
Kenton L. Aim
District Counsel
ADS/PosPap#' /Approp.PP
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1
OF 4
BOARD MEETING OF
NO.
September 16, 1993 4. CONSENT CALENDAR e.
DATE
SUBJECT
ADOPT A RESOLUTION AMENDING EXHIBIT A, DESIGNATED
POSITIONS AND DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES OF THE DISTRICT
CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
S
ADOPT RESOLUTION
AMENDING CONRJCT
OF INTEREST CODE
SUBMITTED BY
Joyce E. Murphy
Secretary of the District
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Administrative
ISSUE: A need exists to update the designated positions contained in Exhibit A of the District's
Conflict of Interest Code.
BACKGROUND: The Political Reform Act of 1974 and the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Conflict of Interest Code require that the Board of Directors adopt a list of designated positions
of officers and employees who make, or participate in making, decisions that could have a
material effect on any personal financial interest. It has been the practice of the District to
review the designated positions on an annual basis and to amend the District Conflict of Interest
Code as necessitated by any changed circumstances, including the creation of new positions and
relevant changes in the duties assigned to existing positions.
Exhibit A, Designated Positions and Disclosure Categories of the District Conflict of Interest
Code, was reviewed by staff and an amendment is proposed to reflect the current organizational
structure of the District. It is recommended that the positions of Collection System
Superintendent, Contract Administrator, Senior Accountant/Internal Auditor, Source Control
Specialist, Survey Supervisor, and Wastewater Control Technician be deleted and that the newly
created positions of Controller, land Surveyor, and Senior Source Control Inspector be added
to the list of designated positions.
After approval by the Board, the proposed amendment to Exhibit A of the District Conflict of
Interest Code must then be submitted to the Board of Supervisors, the code reviewing body.
The amendment takes effect upon its approval by the Board of Supervisors.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached resolution amending Exhibit A, Designated Positions
and Disclosure Categories of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Conflict of Interest Code,
and authorize the Secretary of the District to submit a copy of said code amendment to the
Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors for approval.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
1302A-7/91
M
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION AMENDING EXHIBIT A, DESIGNATED POSITIONS
AND DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES OF THE CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY
DISTRICT CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
WHEREAS, Section 2.20.020 of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Code provides that the Board of Directors shall from time to time establish by
resolution designated positions of officers and employees deemed to make, or
participate in the making of, decisions which may foreseeably have a material effect
on a financial interest.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Central
Contra Costa Sanitary District as follows:
THAT Exhibit A, Designated Positions and Disclosure Categories of the Central
Contra Costa Sanitary District Conflict of Interest Code, a copy of which is attached,
is hereby approved and adopted for the District, subject to approval by the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa; and
THAT the Secretary of the District is hereby authorized and instructed to submit
a copy of such Code amendment to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra
Costa and to request the Board of Supervisors to approve said Code amendment in
accordance with Government Code Section 87303.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Board
of Directors this 16th day of September 1993, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Members:
Members:
Members:
President of the Board of Directors
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District,
County of Contra Costa, State of California
COUNTERSIGNED:
Secretary of the Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District, County of Contra
Costa, State of California
Approved as to form:
Kenton L. Aim
District Counsel
"EXHIBIT A"
DESIGNATED POSITIONS AND DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES
OF THE CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
Desianated Positions
Disclosure Cateaories
1 . Director
2. General Manager-Chief Engineer
3. Secretary of the District
4. Counsel for the District
5. Manager
6. Officer
7. Controller
8. Consultant
9. Control Systems Engineer
10. Real Property Specialist
11. Permit and Services Technician
12. Principal Engineer
13. Senior Engineer
14. Associate Engineer
1 5. Survey Party Chief
1 6. land Surveyor
1 7. Engineering Support Supervisor
18. Senior Inspector
1 9. Collection System Inspection Supervisor
20. Construction Inspector
21 . Source Control Inspector
22. Senior Source Control Inspector
23. Supervising Source Control Inspector
24 Source Control Program Superintendent
25. Principal Buyer
26. Senior Buyer
27. Buyer
28. Materials Coordinator III
29. Plant Operations Superintendent
30. Field Operations Superintendent
31 . Plant Maintenance Superintendent
32. laboratory Superintendent
33. Pumping Stations Superintendent
34. Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance Supervisor
35. Operations Support Supervisor
36. Accounting Supervisor
37. Administrative Analyst
A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H
A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H
A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H
A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H
A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H
A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H
A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H
A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H
A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H
A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H
A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H
B,C,D,E,F,G,H
B,C,D,E,F,G,H
B,C,D,E,F,G,H
B,C,D,E,F,G,H
D,E,F,G,H
D,E,F,G,H
D,E,F,G,H
D,E,F,G,H
D,E,F,G,H
D,E,F,G,H
D,E,F,G,H
D,E,F.G.H
D,E,F,G,H
D,E,F,G,H
D,E,F,G,H
D,E,F,G,H
D,E,F,G,H
D,E,F,G,H
D,E,F,G,H
D,E,F,G,H
D,E,F,G,H
D,E,F,G,H
D,E,F,G,H
D,E,F,G,H
D,E,F,G,H
D,E,F,G,H
"EXHIBIT A" (Continued)
Cateaorv Index
A Investments
B Interests in Real Property
C Interests in Real Property and Investments Held by Business Entities or Trusts
o Income (Other than Gifts or Loans)
E Income (Loans)
F Income (Gifts)
G Business Positions
H Commission Income, Income and Loans to Business Entities or Trusts and Income
from Rental Property
PAGE 1 OF 13
NO.
5. HEARINGS a.
~Teptember 13, 1993
SUBJECT
CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER
APPROVAL OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
AND THE RECYCLED WATER PIPELINE PROJECT, DP 20105
TYPE OF ACTION
PUBLIC HEARING;
NEG.DEC.AND
PROJECT APPROVAL
ISSUE: Board approval of appropriate CEQA documentation is required prior to approval of
the Recycled Water Pipeline Project.
BACKGROUND: The District proposes to construct a recycled water pipeline system from the
recycled water pumps at the District's Wastewater Treatment Plant, in unincorporated
Martinez, south to Oak Park Boulevard, Pleasant Hill, in north central Contra Costa County.
A transmission pipeline up to 24-inches in diameter would extend approximately six miles
through portions of the unincorporated Town of Pacheco and the City of Pleasant Hill. Service
mains (6- to 8-inches in diameter) would be extended to recycled water customers, which may
include golf courses, schools, parks, other public facilities, and homeowners associations. The
proposed recycled water pipeline would be sized to allow for potential system expansion in
the future.
All but about 7,500 feet of the transmission pipeline would be constructed in the same trench
as the Pleasant Hill Relief Interceptor project (Interceptor); therefore, CCCSD would coordinate
construction of the proposed recycled water pipeline with that of the Interceptor.
Construction of the proposed recycled water pipeline would be phased to coincide with the
overall construction of the Interceptor, scheduled to begin in December 1993, and be
completed by December 1998. The remainder of the transmission pipeline and all its service
mains and laterals would be constructed in their own trenches, tunneled, or installed within
an existing pipeline or duct.
If approved, installation of the recycled water pipeline from the District's Wastewater
Treatment Plant south to Chilpancingo Parkway in Pleasant Hill will be included in the first
phase of the Interceptor project. Bids for the first phase are scheduled to be received on
September 30, 1993. The basis for the comparison of bids and award of a construction
contract will be the grand total of the bid prices of the Interceptor work and the 18-inch
diameter recycled water pipeline work. There will be an alternate bid for upsizing the 18-inch
diameter recycled water pipeline to 24 inches. The upsizing of the recycled water pipeline will
be at the discretion of the District.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
Pfff
1302A-7/91
RL
LIP
RAB
"______,~_~___~.._~.,~_~_,__,.._.___'___.___._._,.._"~"._____._._~,___.O>._M..,._._.._~_.._....,______..*_____.d~____'_",_.'_"m~'" ,_._...'_.'_", __,..._...___,._.____...__.~_,._______w'"..,._._.__
SUBJECT
POSITION PAPER
CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER
APPROVAL OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
AND THE RECYCLED WATER PIPELINE
PROJECT, DP 20105
PAGE ? OF 13
DATE
September 13, 1993
The project also includes purchase of about 70,000 feet of a Shell Oil Company fuel pipeline
which runs between Martinez and the Orinda/Moraga area and is no longer in use. Following
lining and rehabilitation, the Shell pipeline could be used eventually as part of a potential
expansion of the recycled water distribution system to enable up to 4,600 acre feet per year
of recycled water to be distributed to potential customers in Concord, Lafayette, Martinez,
Moraga, Orinda and Walnut Creek, in addition to the Pleasant Hill/Pacheco area. Lining,
rehabilitation, and use of the Shell pipeline are not included as part of the current project.
As Lead Agency, the District has conducted an Initial Study of the proposed project to
determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment. Staff has concluded
that the Initial Study adequately, accurately, and objectively evaluates the environmental
impacts of the proposed project, and that a Negative Declaration is the appropriate document
to address the environmental effects of the project. The Initial Study is included as part of the
proposed Negative Declaration which has been distributed separately to the District Board of
Directors.
The proposed Negative Declaration finds that there is no substantial evidence before the
District that the project may have a significant effect on the environment and that no
mitigation measures are needed other than those measures already incorporated into the
project description. These measures are discussed in the proposed Negative Declaration.
Staff also has concluded that Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 regarding a mitigation
monitoring program is not applicable to this project since no changes or conditions of project
approval are required to mitigate potentially significant effects.
In compliance with the District's CEOA Guidelines, a legal notice was published in the Contra
Costa Times, a newspaper of general circulation in the area affected by the proposed project.
The legal notice announced the District's intent to adopt a Negative Declaration and the
availability of the document for a 30-day public review period. Additionally, notice of the
proposed Negative Declaration was mailed to approporiate regulatory agencies, affected cities,
and other interested parties.
Before the proposed project can be approved, the Board must consider any comments received
during the 30-day public review process and the public hearing, then consider approval of the
appropriate CEOA documentation (a Negative Declaration is recommended in this case).
Exhibit A contains the comment letters received and the District staff's responses. Any other
comment letter received will be submitted to the Board of Directors at the September 16,
1993 meeting.
1302B-7/91
---"_.,~--"--_._-~_._-----_._~_._..~--_."_.,--------_._.-,-_....._"."'""--_...__."--,,--"~.._"_.,--"~-,.."._..~+--+._.,_.,"~.,,*_.._,.__.,,"-----,----~",._._-_....,~_._,,---~-,-,,'-----"---""---'---
SUBJECT
POSITION PAPER
CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER
APPROVAL OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
AND THE RECYCLED WATER PIPELINE
PROJECT, DP 20105
PAGE ~
DATE
OF 13
September 13, 1993
If the proposed Negative Declaration and the project are approved, a Notice of Determination
will be filed with the County Clerk.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Conduct a public hearing on the Negative Declaration (a suggested agenda is attached).
2. Adopt the attached resolution approving the Negative Declaration and the Recycled
Water Pipeline Project.
13028-7/91
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A Resolution Approving a Negative Declaration
and the Proposed Recycled Water Pipeline Project, DP 20105
WHEREAS, the project upon which this determination is made is described as follows:
The proposed project involves construction of a recycled water pipeline system from the
recycled water pumps at the District's Wastewater Treatment Plant, in unincorporated
Martinez, south to Oak Park Boulevard, Pleasant Hill, in north central Contra Costa County.
A transmission pipeline up to 24 inches in diameter would extend approximately six miles
through portions of the unincorporated Town of Pacheco and the City of Pleasant Hill. Service
mains (6 to 8 inches in diameter) would be extended to recycled water customers, which may
include golf courses, schools, parks, other public facilities, and homeowners associations. The
proposed recycled water pipeline would be sized to allow for potential system expansion in
the future.
All but about 7,500 feet of the transmission pipeline would be constructed in the same trench
as the Pleasant Hill Relief Interceptor project (Interceptor); therefore, CCCSD would coordinate
construction of the proposed recycled water pipeline with that of the Interceptor.
Construction of the proposed recycled water pipeline would be phased to coincide with the
overall construction of the Interceptor, scheduled to begin in December, 1993, and be
completed by December, 1998. The remainder of the transmission pipeline and all its service
mains and laterals would be constructed in their own trenches, tunneled, or installed within
an existing pipeline or duct.
The project also includes purchase of about 70,000 feet of a Shell Oil Company fuel pipeline
which runs between Martinez and the Orinda/Moraga area and is no longer in use. Following
lining and rehabilitation, the Shell pipeline could be used eventually as part of a potential
expansion of the recycled water distribution system to enable up to 4,600 acre feet per year
of recycled water to be distributed to potential customers in Concord, Lafayette, Martinez,
Moraga, Orinda and Walnut Creek, in addition to the Pleasant Hill/Pacheco area. Lining,
rehabilitation, and use of the Shell pipeline are not included as part of the current project.
WHEREAS, an Initial Study of the proposed project has been conducted by the Central Contra
Costa Sanitary District.
WHEREAS, District staff concludes that the Initial Study adequately, accurately, and
objectively evaluated the proposed effect on the environment.
WHEREAS, adequate public notice was given of the intent to adopt a Negative Declaration,
of the opportunity to review the Initial Study, and to receive comments on the project.
WHEREAS, the District Board of Directors has reviewed the results of the Initial Study and
comments received by the District, and determined that the project will not have a significant
effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Board of Directors of the Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District does hereby find that the Negative Declaration reflects its independent
determinations and judgment, and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration and the
Recycled Water Pipeline Project, DP 20105.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Board of Directors this
16th day of September, 1993 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Members:
Members:
Members:
President of the District Board of the
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District,
County of Contra Costa, State of California
COUNTERSIGNED:
Secretary of the Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District, County of Contra
Costa, State of California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Kenton L. Aim, District Counsel
EXHIBIT A
WRITTEN COMMENTS ON THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION
FOR THE PROPOSED
RECYCLED WATER PIPELINE PROJECT
The following letters were received during the public review period for the proposed Negative
Declaration. Comments from the attached letters are summarized in bold with District staff
responses following.
PAUL RICHARDSON. CHIEF OF PLANNING. CITY OF WALNUT CREEK.
AUGUST 16. 1993
No comments on the Negative Declaration; supports the project. No response necessary.
JOHN B. LAMPE. DIRECTOR OF WATER PLANNING. EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY
DISTRICT (EBMUDl. SEPTEMBER 3. 1993
Future environmental documentation should discuss risks and potential impacts of making
recycled water available in the watershed of EBMUD's terminal water supply reservoirs.
Comment noted; this issue will be addressed in the future if service is proposed within the
watershed area. Furthermore, District staff already has offered to assist EBMUD in developing
a recycled water use policy.
Encroachment on EBMUD rights of way will require obtaining an easement or license from
EBMUD, especially near EBMUD's aqueducts. EBMUD encroachment approval will be sought
as needed. Encroachment near the aqueducts (such as between Oak Park Boulevard and
Astrid Drive) is not proposed at this time.
EBMUD is the recycled water purveyor within its service area. The District hopes to work
cooperatively with EBMUD in purveying recycled water for this project.
To what extent will the proposed project provide recycled water for users in EBMUD's service
area? Who are the potential users? A potential demand for at least 1,500 AFY was identified
in the December 1992 study. The potential users include golf courses, parks, schools, and
homeowners' association common areas.
The proposed project is not included in EBMUD's projection of savings from reclamation
described in EBMUD's December 1992 Water Supply Management Program Draft EIR. EBMUD
will evaluate the proposed project in conjunction with implementation of the EIR's final water
reclamation alternatives. Comment noted; however, this project could be substituted for the
portions of EIR Alternatives A-2 to A-5 which call for a satellite reclamation facility in Orinda
as a future source of recycled water east of the Oakland/Berkeley hills.
A-1
.,. __~._~__,,___,__,,___,__.~__,,__~___.__,__,__'.M__'____..__.._____~_._.__._.____....__.__,___.w_~___..~.____......-.--..---.-.---.---.---------.--....--.--
CHRISTINE BAILEY. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES UNIT. STATE WATER RESOURCES
CONTROL BOARD. SEPTEMBER 3. 1993
Various additional requirements need to be met if the District will be seeking a low interest
loan for this project. The District does not propose to seek low interest loan funding for the
first phase of this project (construction of the recycled water pipeline from the Wastewater
Treatment Plant to Chilpancingo Parkway). If low interest loan funding is sought for future
phases of this project, the District will meet the stated requirements.
ARTHUR R. JENSEN. DIRECTOR OF PLANNING. CONTRA COSTA WATER DISTRICT.
SEPTEMBER 9. 1993
No comments on the Negative Declaration. No response necessary
A-2
::-~'" ..~. ., .'
. '. . .~'~,~;/i;: . ~:'-
.~ '.: ".
. .
00 rnoornuwm 00
.,7m3
CCCSD PLANNING
Wglnul
city OfQftIH
~ 16, 1993
Rus~" reavitt
Envi.ronmental Cbardinatcr
Central Cuuua Costa Camty Sanitary Dist.
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553
RE: RESPONSE 'to NmATIVE DEX::IARATIClN - REX:.YCLED WATER
PIPELINE ~
Dear Mr. reavitt:
Walnut Creek staff has reviewed the Negative Dee) ::llration on the above
project. since the recycled water pipeline will nX ext:errl to the city
of Walnut Creek we have no cnTII'I1Pnts on the Negative Declaration.
However, we support the District's efforts to supply recycled water to
golf courses, schools, parks ani other public lard..c::caped areas such as
freeways. We TNOUld ~l:t efforts to ext:en:l the recycled pipeline to
Walnut Creek provided all environmental issues are addressed.
We hope this reclycled water will provide an inexpensive alternative to
potable water supplies for public larrlscaped areas.
ul Ri
Olief of PlaImi.n:J
c:c: City c:curx:il
City Manager
CDD Director
City Engineer
Sr. SUpervisin;J Civil Engineer
PR:jjh
Doc 585 [plg_7]
A-3 .
P,O. Box 8039 . 1666 North Main Street . Walnut Creek. California 94596 ... (510) 943-5800
"":.:-= ":"":'"":~"2':: :,- ':==,:\':'e-: ='?~~,~
~C> EAST BAY
<../.:> MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
-. \. ~'3J-"'~-:
September 3, 1993
Mr. Russell Leavitt
Environmental Coordinator
Central Contra Costa County Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553
SUBJECT: Negative Declaration for the Proposed Recycled Water
Pipeline
Dear Mr. Leavitt:
Thank you for the opportunity to comnient an 'the-sllbject Negative
Declaration. The East Bay Municipal District (EBMUD) has the
following comments.
The "Shell oil pipeline" would make reclaimed water available
for irrigation in the watersheds of EBMUD's terminal water
supply reservoirs. The future environmental documentation
that is proposed for system expansion to make this pipeline
usable should discuss and evaluate the risks and potential
impacts ~n watershed lands. EBMUD is developing a recycled
water use policy, due for completion in 1994, which will
affect future uses of reclaimed water in is service area.
The proposed alignment may encroach on EBMUD's aqueducts,
particularly in the area between Oak Park Boulevard and Astrid
Drive. Although the Negative Declarat~on refers to agency
coordination required with CCWD and EBMUD for impacts on
pipelines, it was not clear that aqueducts are considered to
be pipelines. Any encroachment will require obtaining an
easement or license from EBMUD, which would spell out the
EBMUD requirements for construction within its rights of way.
The Negative Declaration states on Page~ 3 and 14 that" "EBMUD
may be" a major purveyor of recycled w"ater, " and that" EBMUD
"has the discretion to purvey" recycled water in its service
area. Per section 12818 of the Municipal utility District
Act, EBMUD is the recycled water purveyor within its service
area, and the Negative Declaration should clearly state this.
In order for EBMUD to purvey reclaimed water, issues regarding
ownership and operation of facilities which would provide such
reclaimed water must first be addressed.
The Negative Declaration does not address the extent to which
the proposed project will provide recycled water for uses in
375 ELEVENTH STREET. OAKLANO . CA 94607-4240 . /5101 835-3000
P.O. BOX 24055 . OAKLANO . CA 94623-1055
BOARD OF DIRECTORS KATHERINE McKENNEY. STUART FlASHMAN . ANDREW COHEN
JOHN A. COLEMAN. JOHN M. GIOIA. NANCY J. NADEL. KENNETH H. SIMMONS
A-4
Recvc1ec Plloer
.__.__+,____~________.____.,__"______..._._"_.____~______~__'".."~U____._._.<_...u_..,____'_.__~_._._.".___,._,_+..___+",.,,___.n_.___~"_ ._." _._______._".....______.____.__
Mr. Russell Leavitt
September 3, 1993
Page 2
EBMUD's service area. It refers, on Page 4, to potential uses
of 2,600 AFY as defined in a December, 1992 feasibility study,
Recycled Water for Landscaoe Irriqation, and ultimate uses of
4,600 AFY projected to occur within the CCWD and EBMUD service
areas as defined in the February, 1992 Recycled Water Master
'Plan. However, it is not clear how much demand is proposed to
be served by each jurisdiction.
The Negative Declaration should generally identify the
potential users who would be served by both the "recycled
water pipeline" and the "Shell oil pipeline" portions of the
proposed project.
Text on Page 37 states that the proposed project is included
in EBMUD's "8,000 AFY projected savings from reclamation", per
the Draft EIR/EIS EBMUD Uodated Water SuoolY Manaqement
Proqram dated December, 1992. EBMUD has targeted over 17,000
AFY as its future reclamation sayings goal. Approximately
half of this will be from existing and adopted reclamation
programs, and half from projects which were identified in the
EIR. The proposed project was not included as a potential
alternative in EBMUD's EIR. EBMUD plans to evaluate the
proposed project in conjunction with implementation of the
EIR's final water reclamation alternatives.
Please direct any questions to Tak Mizuno at (510) 287-1030.
cc: Board of Directors
A-5
"..~.._"---,~._-_._-------_._---~_."-_.._----_..__._...----^_._----"-,.._-,----_."..._"--".._--~-'_..._-_."
STATE OF CALIFORNIA. CALIFORNIA ENVIRON~ .AL PROTECTION AGENCY
peTe WILSON. Governor
STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD
DIVISION OF CLEAN WATER PROGRAMS
2014 T STREET. SUITE 130
P.O. BOX 944212
SACRAMENTO. CA 94244.2120
@'.
.-
~t ~ ,I
..., .
(916) 227-4525
(916) 227-4349 FAX
SEP 0 3 1993
, , \
o.~~ . ~~< \.
V ;./'!' /'
r$. ~.~~~\if..';"~
/. r................
. ..,c' c\,.,..
"./:'c:.. '" "'
.,;? ~,\ ....iiIY
" \}.;"
Mr. Russell Leavitt
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019' Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553
\,-,,?"
Dear Mr. Leavitt:
NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR'THE PROPOSED RECYCLED WATER PIPELINE PROJECT FOR
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT (SCH NO. 93081025)
Thank you for the opportunity to review the above document. As we discussed
over the telephone, the State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Clean
Water Programs (State Water Board) is responsible for administering low
interest loans for water reclamation projects. If Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District will be seeking one of these loans for any part of the
project covered by the subject Negative Declaration, the State Water Board will
be a responsible agency under CEQA, and will use the final Negative Declaration
when deciding whether to issue the loan.
In addition to the final Negative Declaration, please provide us with (1) all
comments received during the review period and your responses to those
comments, (2) a mitigation implementation and monitoring plan, (3) the Notice
of Determination (filed with the State Office of Planning and Research), and
(4) the State Department of Fish and Game1s Environmental Filing Fee receipt or
exemption finding. In addition, we would appreciate notice of any meeting
scheduled for adoption of the final document.
In addition, to meet requirements for loans from the State Revolving Fund Loan
Program (SRF), we must consult directly with agencies responsible for
implementing federal environmental laws. You have already circuiated the draft
Negative Declaration to several of these agencies and, if the project remains
unchanged, we will not have to duplicate submittal to these agencies if you
provide us with copies of the certified mail receipts and if you have
circulated it to all the required agencies. Please provide us with the
certified mail receipts well before the time you want loan approval so that we
can do any additional consultation that may be necessary without delaying your
loan application.
In addition, while CEQA itself does not require formal public hearings at any
stage of the environmental review process, at least one hearing is required for
a SRF loan project. Notices need to be distributed 30 days in advance with a
copy sent to us.
A-6
~..__._-_.__.._-~----_.~-------_....._----,._-----_._~---.-------,.-.----..-..--..-..-----.....- ~.,_._----,-_._.._-_..-._--
Mr. Russell Leavitt
-2-
SEP 0 3 1993
Finally, SRF loans must meet the requirements of Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act. In order to do this we must obtain clearance from
the State Historic Preservation Office. This process takes approximately 45
days once the required information is submitted to the State Water Board.
Please contact our cultural resources officer, Mr. Joe Pope, for further
information on these requirements.
Our only comment on the Negative Declaration is that additional CEQA
documentation will be required prior to environmental approval of loan funds
for service mains and laterals. Specific locations for the service mains and
laterals evidently Rave not been determined at this, time and"we must have the
specifi'c ,locations before we can determine"whather' theie ,:night be a significant
impact to the environment. .
Also, would you please send us a copy of Figure 3 from the Negative
Declaration? We cannot read the copy in the Negative Declaration.
Please call me at (916) 227-4525 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
C~~~l~ .
Environmental Services Unit
cc: State Clearinghouse
1400 Tenth Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
Regional Water Quality Control Board
San Francisco Bay Region
2101 Webster Street, Suite 500
Oakland, CA 94612
A-7
._,--~_."-""..__.._----------'~-'--_._--'--"-'--'~-_...._-".._---,..~._-_..._-_._,_.~---_._---_._._._._"."-...._~-._~.__.~._-
...~ CONTRA COSTA
WATER DISTRICT
~ 1331 Concord Avenue
P.O. Box H20
Concord. CA 94524
(510) 674-8000 FAX (510) 674-8122
~ ;~l G :~: -.r? ;-~7--r;--
/' U~' ~ ~ ;~ II,~ ,$ /-,:,
r ~ w .' ~ '
~1 ~ ,ryl
Wi SEP I 01993 JW
CCCSD PLANNING
Directors
Ronald E. Butler
President
Daniel L. Pellegrini .
Vice President
Bette Boatmun
Donald P. Freitas
Joseph L Campbell
Walter J. Bishop
General Manager
September 9. 1993
Sent by Facsimile
(510) 228-4624
Mr. RUssell Leavitt
Central Contra Costa Sanitation District
50 19 Imhoff Place
Martinez. CA 94553
Subject: Recycled Water Pipeline Negative Declaration
Dear Mr. Leavitt:
The Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) has reviewed the referenced Negative
Declaration and has determined no comments are necessary. Our comments on
the Administrative Draft have been satisfactorily addressed. We appreciate your
efforts in informing CCWD of your progress in developing the project
Sincerely.
~0'1O
Director OfPI~~
(510) 674-8100
ARJIFG/rlr
~ e--
A-8
._.,--,-,~--_._------------'--~_.~-_.....~_..__..,~'_.----_.".-~------,----_._--""'--'--_._.__._- -..-.--..,. ,_..,..,._--_.~_.,._.._._._---_._-_.,'--,._.....,.,---
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 6
BOARD MEETING OF
September 16, 1993
NO.
7. BIDS AND AWARDS a.
AUTHORIZE AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
TO MOUNTAIN CASCADE FOR THE 1-680/SR-24 SEWER
RELOCATIONS, PHASE IV-A DISTRICT, PROJECT NO. 4824
DATE
Se tember 10 1993
TYPE OF ACTION
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZE AWARD/
ALLOCATE FUNDS
SUBMITTED BY
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Rey I. Limjoco, Assistant Engineer
Engineering Dept.llnfrastructure Div.
ISSUE: On September 1, 1993, sealed bids for the construction of District Project No. 4824,
1-680/SR-24 Sewer Relocations, Phase IV-A, were opened. The Board of Directors must
authorize award of the contract or reject bids within 50 days of the opening of bids.
BACKGROUND: Caltrans' next phase of its 1-680/SR-24 freeway widening and interchange
modification consists of construction of a new Ygnacio Valley Road north bound off ramp along
Oakland Boulevard and the replacement of the Oakvale Road - Trinity Avenue bridge in Walnut
Creek (see Attachment 1). To accommodate this Caltrans project, a temporary 8-inch diameter
sewer bypass approximately 308 feet long will be installed at the downstream end (east side)
of the bridge to intercept the flow to the Trinity Avenue sewer from the tributary area west of
the 1-680 freeway. The permanent sewer replacement will be suspended under the new bridge
as part of this Caltrans project. In addition, four (4) new manholes will be constructed, the
house plumbing for an existing apartment building on Lacassie Avenue will be rerouted, and
some segments of existing sewers and manholes on Oakland Boulevard and adjoining areas will
be abandoned. To make room for replumbing of the apartment building, Pacific Gas and
Electric will relocate its gas and electric service at a cost of $8,153 to be done under a
separate contract.
The Caltrans 1-680/SR-24 Project has been broken into several phases with completion of the
final phase scheduled for 1995/96. Additional sewer relocations will be required under future
phases. As in previous relocations, the District will handle all aspects of the relocations with
Caltrans reimbursing the District for the total project cost. On October 9, 1991, the District
executed a utility agreement with Caltrans to receive reimbursement for costs associated with
the planning, design, and construction of the Phase IV-A relocation affected by the freeway
widening.
The adjusted pre-bid estimate for construction is $80,000. This estimate was reduced from
the Engineer's estimate of $100,000 to reflect the current favorable bidding climate. The
project was advertised on August 11 and 18, 1993. Eight bids ranging from $58,585.00 to
$123,184.00 were publicly opened on September 1, 1993. A summary of bids is presented
in Attachment 2. The Engineering Department conducted a technical and commercial
evaluation of bids and concluded that the lowest responsible bidder is Mountain Cascade.
RE~EWEDANDRECOMMENDEDFORBOARDAcnON
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
~
/"0/
/ltJp
1302A-7/91
RIL
TJP
JSM
RAB
SUBJECT
111111111111-111
AUTHORIZE AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
TO MOUNTAIN CASCADE FOR THE 1-680/SR-24 SEWER
RELOCATIONS, PHASE IV-A DISTRICT, PROJECT NO. 4824
PAGE
DATE
2
OF
6
September 10, 1993
District staff will administer the contract and provide inspection services. The 1-680/SR-24
Sewer Relocation, Phase IV-A is included in the 1993-94 CIS at Page CS-39. A post bid pre-
construction estimate is presented in Attachment 3. An allocation of $97,000.00 from the
Collection System Program is needed to complete the project. The current balance of the
Sewer Construction Fund, minus unspent authorizations, plus projected dependable revenue
will be adequate to fund this project. A funding summary is presented in Attachment 4.
Staff has determined that this project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) under District CEOA Guidelines, Section 18.2, since it involves minor alterations to
existing sewage facilities with negligible or no expansion of use. The Board of Director's
approval of this project will constitute a finding of agreement with this determination unless
otherwise indicated.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize award of a contract to Mountain Cascade, the lowest
responsible bidder in the amount of $58,585.00 for the construction of the 1-680/SR-24 Sewer
Relocations, Phase IV-A, District Project No. 4824. Authorize the General Manager-Chief
Engineer to allocate $97,000.00 from the Collection System Program for the project.
13028-7/91
~----,--~--_...-~._-------~".._.._---~-~
Q
Walnut Cree
OAKLAND BLVDJ
LACASSIE AVE.
Orinda
Alamo
Danville
I . Project Location
Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District
DP 4824-1 680/SR 24 Sewer
Relocations, Phase IV-A
Attachment
1
ATTACHMENT 2
Central ~ontra Costa Sanit_ry District
SUMMARV OF BIDS
PROJECT NO. 4824 1-680jSR-24 Sewer Relocations DATE September 1. 1993
Phase IV-A
LOCATION Oakl and Boul evardjLacass i e Avenue, Walnut CreekENGR. EST. $ 80 ,000
~-~
BIDDER (Nome, telephone &. address)
BIO PRle.
~
Mountain Cascade ( 510 ) 373-8370 $
1 58.585.00
P. O. Box 5050, Livermore CA 94550
~ .. -
O. R. Redick ( 510 ) 784-0487 $
. 2 22990 Clawiter Road, Hayward, CA 94545 59,940.75
Jardin Pipeline. Inc. ( 510 ) 782-5335 $
3 O. Box 20817 Castro Valley, CA 94546 75,220.00
P.
-
O. E. Bianchini. Inc. ( 510) 831-0400 $
4 339 Borica Place. Oanvi 11 e. CA 94526 76,478.000
.....-
Joe Carone, Inc. ( 510) 787-7283 $
5 2294 Vista del Rio, Crockett , CA 94525 84,658.00
-
O. W. Younq ( 510 ) 487-0724 $
6 34301 7th Street. Union City. CA 94587 84,998.00
-
.
Silva's P.ipeline"" {5io") 786-2722 " $'" 87,616.00
7 . 1310 Ruus Lane, Hayward. CA- 94549
Sarott Construction ( 510 ) 672-n20 $: 123,184.00
8 3133 Morgan Territory Roaq, Cla:yton, CA 94517
( ) $
-
( ) $
-
( ) $
( ) $
0....-
BIDS OPENED BY
Joyce E. Murphy
DATE
September 1, 1993
SHEET NO.
OF
2S0)-1l:64
-,_..._-----_._-_._--------------"...~-'-_.~"-'---'_.--_.._._._-,_._--_._._-_._,-_.-._.._'~-"~_..,-_..,...,..~._.-.-_._~
ATTACHMENT 3
1-680/SR-24 SEWER RELOCATIONS, PHASE IV-A
DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 4824
POST-BID/PRECONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE
PERCENT OF
ESTIMATED
CONSTRUCTION
ITEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST
1 . Construction Contract $66,738 82.0
a. Sewer construction contract $58,585
b. PG & E gas and electric relocation $8,153
2. Contingency at 25 % 1 (sewer contract) 14,262 18.0
SUBTOTAL $81,000 100.0
3. Construction Management $26,000 32.1
4. Consultant Contractors $13,000 16.0
5. Miscellaneous $1 2,000 14.8
6. Prebid Expenditure
. Predesign2 42,000
. Design 38,000
SUBTOTAL $80,000 98.8
7. Total Project Cost Estimate 212,000 261.7
8. Funds Authorized to Date 115,000
9. Total Allocation of Funds to Complete Project $97,000
1 A 25 percent construction contingency was utilized
because the project is small and involves work on private
property.
2Predesign includes the relocation of the Trinity Bridge
Sewer which will be done as part of the Caltrans road
project.
ID / A: DP4824/Postbid. Est
ATTACHMENT 4
PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY
FOR THE PERIOD
August 12, 1993 - September 10, 1993
Sewer Construction Fund Balance $60,737,899
(As of July 31, 1993)
Minus Unspent Prior Authorizations (39,141,186)
Plus Dependable Revenue 25,474,400
TOTAL 47,071,113
ALLOCATION REQUIRED 97,000
I D / A: 4898/Funding. Sum