HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA BACKUP 03-16-95
~
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 2
BOARD MEETING OF
March 16, 1995
NO.
SUBJECT
3. CONSENT CALENDAR a
DAT'March 7, 1995
AUTHORIZATION FOR P.A. 95-5 (ALAMO) TO BE INCLUDED IN
A FUTURE FORMAL ANNEXATION TO THE DISTRICT
TYPE OF ACTION
ACCEPT ANNEXATION
FOR PROCESSING
SUBMITTED BY
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Dennis Hall, Associate Engineer
Engineering Dept.llnfrastructure Div.
Parcel Area Owner/Address Lead
No. Parcel No. & Acreage Remarks Agency
95-5 Alamo David Trisko Each of these two CCCSD
(7705) 13 Marion Ct. parcels has an
Alamo, CA 94507 existing house with
198-040-005 (0.39Ac) a failing septic
system and must
Pierre Begin connect to the
1 2 Marion Ct. public sewer
Alamo, CA 94507 system. Project is
198-040-007 (0.39 Ac) exempt from CEOA.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize P.A. 95-5 to be included in a future formal annexation.
JSM
RAB
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
1302A-7/91
IQlJ./
DH
,II;!
;J;iJ
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
ANNEXATION
PROPOSED
P .A. 95-5
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 1
BOARD MEETING OF
March 16, 1995
NO.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR b.
ACCEPT CONTRACT WORK FOR THE CATHODIC PROTECTION
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 6103
DATE
M r
TYPE OF ACTION
SUBJECT
ACCEPT CONTRACT
WORK
SUBMITTED BY
Paul A. Sciuto,
Assistant En ineer
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Plant Operations Departmentl
Maintenance En ineerin
ISSUE: Construction has been completed on the Cathodic Protection Improvement Project, District
Project No. 6103. The work is now ready for acceptance.
BACKGROUND: This project is the first in a continuing series of improvements, which will replace
elements of the cathodic protection systems that have been identified as deficient. This project
involved the replacement or installation of cathodic protection systems at the following sites:
Bates Avenue Pumping Station, Buchanan Pumping Station (Nos. 1 and 2), Concord Industrial
Pumping Station, Sleepy Hollow Pumping Station, the M-4 Force main, and various treatment plant
sites.
On October 6, 1994, the Board authorized the award of this construction contract to Ballard
Construction, Inc. All construction has been completed for the bid amount of $98,000 plus one
change .order for $4,200 due to unforeseen obstructions and permitting difficulties resulting in a
contract total of $102,200. It is appropriate to accept the contract work at this time. This project
was not included in the Capital Improvement Budget.
RECOMMENDATION: Accept contract work for the Cathodic Protection Improvement Project
(District Project No. 6103), and authorize the filing of the Notice of Completion.
COMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
PAS
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1 OF 4
BOARD MEETING OF
March 16, 1995
NO.
5. BIDS AND AWARDS a.
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZE AWARD OF CONTRACT TO ELLIS ROOFING
COMPANY FOR TREATMENT PLANT ROOF REPLACEMENT-
PHASE I, DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 6098
DATE
March 10 1995
TYPE OF ACTION
AUTHORIZE AWARD OF
CONTRACT
SllflMITTEQ BY .
...aul A. SCiuto,
Assistant Engineer
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Plant Operations Departmentl
Maintenance En ineerin
ISSUE: The District has received bids for District Project No. 6098, the Treatment Plant Roof
Replacement Project - Phase I. The Board of Directors must authorize award of the construction
contract or reject all bids within 60 days of the opening of bids.
BACKGROUND: The 5A Treatment Plant Structures were built in the mid-1970's. The 20-year
roof life has expired, and replacement or rehabilitation is now prudent to prevent damage and
reduce maintenance costs. The District will phase all necessary roof replacement work over three
years with the most critically deficient roof work done in Phase I.
The roof areas identified for replacement or rehabilitation for Phase I include the Filter Plant, the
walkway between the Headquarters Office Building (HOB) and the Plant Operations Department
(POD), the south side of the POD building, and the Solids Conditioning Building. A standard three-
ply built-up roof will be used in these areas.
The project was advertised on February 6 and 11, 1995. Ten bids were received and publicly
opened on March 2. These bids are listed on Attachment 1, Summary of Bids. The lowest
responsible bidder is Ellis Roofing Company with a bid of $130,146 for furnishing and installing all
materials and equipment necessary to construct the Treatment Plant Roof Replacement Project-
Phase I. The initial engineer's estimate for the work was $146,000.
The project is included in the Fiscal Year 1994-95 Capital Improvement Budget on page TP-67.
The current balance of the Sewer Construction Fund, minus unspent project allocations, plus
projected dependable revenue will be adequate to fund this project. A funding summary is
presented in Attachment 3.
Staff has determined that this project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) under District CECA Guidelines Section 18.2, since it involves a minor alteration to an
existing facility with little or no increase in capacity. The Board of Directors' approval of this
project will constitute a finding that the project is exempt from CECA.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize award of contract to Ellis Roofing Company, the lowest
responsible bidder, for $130,146 for the Treatment Plant Roof Replacement Project-Phase I,
District Proje No. 6098.
ECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
,,/
1302A-7/91 <
PAS
ATTACHMENT 1
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
SUMMARY OF BIDS
Page 2 of 4
PROJECT NO. 6098
DATE: March 2, 1995
PROJECT: Treatment Plant Roof Replacement - Phase I
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $146,000
BIDDER BID PRICE
1. Ellis Roofing $130,146
2. Sparks Roofing $134,066
3. State Roofing $139,800
4. Guys Roofing Inc. $149,900
5. Royal Roofing $151,394
6. Henris Roofing Co. $187,264
7. Western Roofing Co. $190,435
8. Pioneer Roofing Co. $192,770
9. Enterprise Roofing Service $198,474
10. Industrial Roofing Co. $205,650
ATTACHMENT 2 Page 3 of 4
TREATMENT PLANT ROOF REPLACEMENT - PHASE I
DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 6098
POST -BID PRECONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE
PERCENT OF
CONSTRUCTION
ITEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL COSTS
1. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT $ 130,146
2. CONTINGENCY AT 20 PERCENT 26.054
SUBTOTAL: 156,200 100.0
3. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
ADMINISTRATION/INSPECTION 8,000
4. ENGINEERING/AS-BUILT DRAWINGS 1,000
5. PLANT OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT 6.300
SUBTOTAL: 15,300 9.8
6. PRE-BID AND PREVIOUS PHASES
(EXPENDITURES) 14,500 9.3
7. TOTAL PROJECT COSTS THROUGH THIS
PHASE 186,000 119
8. FUNDS AUTHORIZED TO DATE 25.000
9. TOTAL PROJECT COSTS REQUIRED TO
COMPLETE THIS PROJECT $ 161.000
1---
ATTACHMENT 3
PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY
FOR THE PERIOD
03/1 0/95 THROUGH 04/09/95
SEWER CONSTRUCTION FUND BALANCE AS OF
02/28/95**
MINUS UNSPENT PRIOR ALLOCATIONS
PLUS DEPENDABLE CURRENT YEAR REVENUE
(1/95 THROUGH 6/95)
$32,200,000
> $161 ,000
$68,300,000
(39,700,000)
3,600,000
$32,200,000
(ALLOCATION
REQUIRED)
**Balance includes the unspent proceeds of the 1994 Capital Tax and Revenue antici-
pation Notes (TRANs), and the 1994 Revenue Installment Certificates (COPs). Out-
standing debt as of 3/31/95 is projected to be $35,737,334.
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1
OF 7
BOARD MEETING OF
March 16, 1995
NO.
6. ENGINEERING a.
SUBJECT
ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING AS PREQUALlFIED
MICROTUNNELlNG/PIPE JACKING CONTRACTORS FOR THE
PLEASANT HILL RELIEF INTERCEPTOR PROJECT, PHASE 3,
D.P. 5031
DATE
March 10 1 995
TYPE OF ACTION
ADOPT RESOLUTION
SUBMITTED BY
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Michael J. Penny, Assistant Engineer
Engineering Dept./lnfrastructure Div.
ISSUE: A Board resolution is needed to approve prequalification of contractors which staff
recommends to be prequalified.
BACKGROUND: The Pleasant Hill Relief Interceptor Phase 3 sewer project includes the
installation of approximately 5,900 feet of 48, 18, 15, 10, and 8 inch pipeline. Of this total,
approximately 3,000 feet of 48 inch pipeline will be installed utilizing microtunneling/pipe
jacking methods along Grayson Creek under Golf Club Road and Viking Drive and under the
City of Pleasant Hill Corporation Yard. The geologic conditions in the areas of the
microtunneling generally consist of soft, medium stiff, and stiff clay, interbedded with
saturated silty and clayey sand layers. It is anticipated that all of the tunneling will be below
the groundwater levels.
In order to stabilize the tunnel direction, control groundwater inflows, minimize surface
settlement and reduce dewatering requirements, the use of specialized advanced technology
equipment involving pressurized face microtunneling/pipe jacking equipment with a closed
face tunnel shield and positive, controllable face pressure is a requirement for the project.
Due to the anticipated difficult tunneling conditions and the requirement for the use of this
equipment, contractors who propose to perform the microtunneling/pipe jacking work must
have sufficient experience utilizing the specialized equipment and certain other experience.
Pre qualification of these microtunneling/pipe jacking contractors/subcontractors is necessary
and is in the best interest of the District because of the difficulty of the work and the need
to have the work done properly and safely. Objective criteria for pre qualification are shown
in Exhibit A.
/W
{~
;"r;:J
ROGER J. DOLAN
RE~EWEDANDRECOMMENDEDFORBOARDAcnON
MJP
TJP
JSM
RAB
ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING AS PREQUALlFIED
MICROTUNNELlNG/PIPE JACKING CONTRACTORS FOR THE
PLEASANT HILL RELIEF INTERCEPTOR PROJECT, PHASE 3,
D.P. 5031
..........................................................,.....................
111111111111111111
SUBJECT
PAGE 2 OF 7
DATE
March 10, 1995
A notice inviting prequalification submittals was published on January 23, 1995. A copy of
the Notice Inviting Submittals is attached as in Exhibit B. Four submittals were received by
the due date of February 17, 1995, and evaluated by District staff through an objective
process. The four contractors who submitted information were determined to be
prequalified. Two of these contractors, Nova Group and Vadanis Corporation have had
limited experience with intermediate jacking stations. Hence, their prequalification will be
conditioned by requiring each contractor to retain a consultant who is knowledgeable on the
use, spacing, and placement of intermediate jacking stations. A list of the contractors
recommended as prequalified is contained in Exhibit C.
The Board of Directors, in 1993, approved seven contractors as being prequalified for
microtunneling/pipe jacking on Phases 1 and 2 of the Interceptor Project. These seven
contractors are listed in Exhibit D and are included in the approval of prequalified contractors
for the Pleasant Hill Relief Interceptor Phase 3 project. The Board's determination that only
certain contractors are prequalified for the microtunneling/pipe jacking work is applicable to
this project only and the specific circumstances involved. It is not intended to reflect
adversely upon the ability of contractors not determined to be prequalified.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution approving as prequalified the microtunneling/pipe
jacking contractors listed in Exhibits C and D for the Pleasant Hill Relief Interceptor Project
Phase 3.
13028-7/91
---r..,--.---'----...----'-'-.----....".~-_._------------>'._. ,.--.-..-----.-~_....---~------.__.------'--_.
EXHIBIT A
SUMMARY OF PREQUALlFICA TION CRITERIA
Contractors must meet the following criteria:
· Successful completion of two tunneling projects in the last five years using
specialized microtunneling/pipe jacking equipment (pressurized face with a closed
face tunnel shield and positive, controllable face pressure).
· Successful completion of at least one project in geologic conditions similar to those
of the Pleasant Hill Project utilizing specialized microtunneling/pipe jacking
equipment and one project using one or more intermediate jacking stations.
· Tunneling experience of a project superintendent of at least ten years and of
microtunneling/pipe jacking machine operator of at least five years. The
superintendent and operator must have worked on at least two projects using the
specialized microtunneling/pipe jacking equipment required for this project.
· Demonstration of successful completion of all public works projects entered into
since January 1, 1992.
IDle: Infra/PP/5031.Sum
---1 .____..m___...._.._____ ..- -.. .-.0--.--...
EXHIBIT B
NOTICE INVITING SUBMITTALS
MICROTUNNElING/PIPE JACKING
PREQUAlIFICA TION
PLEASANT HILL RELIEF INTERCEPTOR PROJECT. PHASE 3 -
DISTRICT PROJECT NO. 5031
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT. MARTINEZ. CA
Notice is hereby given that sealed pre qualification Submittals for boring
Contractors/Subcontractors (Contractors) will be received by mail or at the receptionist
area of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District ("District"), 5019 Imhoff Place,
Martinez, California 94553, Attention: Secretary of the District, until 2 p.m. Pacific
Standard Time, February 17, 1995. Three copies of the Submittal are required.
Contractors previously prequalified for the Pleasant Hill Relief Interceptor Project Phases
1 and 2 do not need to submit a prequalification submittal.
Construction of the Pleasant Hill Relief Interceptor Project Phase 3 ("Project") will
involve the installation of about 2,200 feet of concrete pipe using microtunneling/pipe
jacking methods. The project includes 1,050 feet of 48-inch RCP to be installed by three
separate drives and 1,150 feet of 42-inch RCP to be installed by three separate drives.
It is anticipated that intermediate jacking stations may be required for the longer drive
lengths. The current Project schedule is to advertise the Project in March 1995, receive
bids in April 1995, and award the contract in April 1995. Approximately 6 months will
be allowed for completion of the Project.
Because of geologic conditions present at the site, the use of pressurized face
microtunneling/pipe jacking equipment employing either earth pressure balance,
pressurized slurry, or a combination of the two methods for the tunnels is required. The
tunneling equipment must be a closed face tunnel shield with the capability to exert a
positive, controllable pressure at the tunnel face. Line and grade is to be monitored using
laser methods and controlled within ..:f:.. 1".
Because of the specialized nature of this work and the specific anticipated site
constraints, the District requires that all microtunneling/pipe jacking Contractors prequalify
for this Project. A list of prequalified Contractors will be provided with the Bid
Documents. The use of a non-prequalified Contractor will not be allowed. Contractors
wishing to participate in the prequalification evaluation must complete a written Submittal
in accordance with the District's "Request for Submittals" ("RFS"). The "RFS" is deemed
to include the Notice Inviting Submittals dated January 10, 1995, the Instructions to
Contractors/Subcontractors, the Submittal and any addenda issued.
IDle: Infre/DP/5031/Invite. Sub
1
_," '_'_'__"'__~~"'_'___",.M,_.~__'_n'_"_M_....._~._
"
The RFS may be obtained at no cost from Central Contra Costa Sanitary District,
5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553, Attention: Mr. Michael Penny. Contractors are
requested to obtain copies of the RFS in person. Written and telephone requests (51 0-
229-7120) will be honored, but timely delivery cannot be guaranteed.
The District will review the Submittals and determine which Contractors are
prequalified. Each participating Contractor will be notified in writing of the prequalification
decision made upon the Contractor's Submittal.
Contractors should note that prequalification does not exempt a Contractor from
meeting each requirement of law, such as licensing, prevailing wage, public work, and all
other applicable laws and each requirement of the final contract documents.
Dated: January 10, 1995
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY
DISTRICT
Joy
IO/C:lnfraIDP/5031/lnvite.Sub
2
-----------.,
EXHIBIT C
STAFF RECOMMENDATION OF PREQUALlFIED CONTRACTORS
Frank Coluccio Construction Company
Seattle, Washington
Nada Pacific
Sunland, California
Nova Group
Napa, California
Prequalification conditioned upon retaining a consultant for
advice during tunneling operations relative to the use, spacing,
and placement of intermediate jacking stations.
Vadnais Corporation
San Diego, California
Prequalification conditioned upon retaining a consultant for
advice during tunneling operations relative tot he use, spacing,
and placement of intermediate jacking stations.
ID/C: Infra/DP/5031/Contrtor. ExC
...--.,
EXHIBIT D
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PREQUALlFIED CONTRACTORS FOR PHASES 1 AND 2
BRH-Garver
Houston, Texas
Constructors-PAMCO
Seattle, Washington
E. E. Cruz and Co., Inc.
Holmdel, New Jersey
Michels Pipeline Construction
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Oscar Renda Contracting
Roanoke, Texas
Western Utility Contractors
Pleasant Grove, Utah
W & F and FKCI Partnership
Evansville, Indiana
IDle: Infra/DP/5031/Contrtor.ExD
l._..--._--".-._-_._--.....,-'_._--~--_.,..._._-------_.--.-----..'-..-
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PAGE 1
OF 6
BOARD MEETING OF
March 16, 1995
SUBJ~DOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING DIRECTIONAL DRILLLlNG
DEMONSTRATION PROJECT AND AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL
MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH
UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. FOR THE
KNOX DRIVE SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT, DISTRICT
PROJECT NO. 4602
NO.
6. ENGINEERING b.
DATEt=ebruary 24, 1995
TYPE OF ACTION
ADOPT RESOLUTIONI
AUTHORIZE
AGREEMENT
SUBMITTED BY
INITIATING DEPT.lDIV.
Curtis W. Swanson, Principal Engineer
Engineering Dept.llnfrastructure Div.
Issue: Board authorization is required for the General Manager-Chief Engineer to execute
construction contracts over $10,000 and to exempt projects from public bidding for field testing
purposes.
Backaround: In 1982, earth movement displaced approximately 225 feet of 8-inch District sewer
main near Knox Drive in Lafayette. A temporary sewer line was installed immediately and is
maintained on a weekly basis by the Collection Systems Operations Department. Replacement
or relocation of the sewer was delayed because of litigation involving the District and adjacent
property owners. In addition, permanent repair or replacement of the sewer main within the
existing easement was complicated by slope stability concerns and construction access limitations.
The project location is shown in Attachment 1.
In developing alternatives to repair or replace the damaged sewer, Engineering Department staff
considered conventional opencut and newer trenchless technology construction methods. Staff
has determined that installation of a new sewer along a new alignment using a trenchless
technology known as directional drilling is the most cost effective alternative. The new sewer will
be installed in easements along a new alignment away from a creek and the area with slope
stability problems. Directional drilling is also the most practical alternative for this project because
of the potential for minimizing construction impacts on the neighborhood and the ability to install
sewers in difficult access situations. Directional drilling technology consists of drilling a small pilot
hole with a directionally controlled cutting head along the desired sewer alignment and profile.
Once the pilot hole is complete, high density polyethylene (HOPE) sewer pipe is pulled behind a
reamer which expands the pilot hole to a size slightly larger than the outside diameter of the new
sewer pipe. In 1988 and 1989, the District conducted demonstration projects with Flow Mole
Corporation involving directional drilling. While the results of these demonstration projects were
generally favorable, there were problems maintaining grade and alignment using the directional
drilling technology. Because of these problems, the District has not used directional drilling since
these two demonstration projects.
During the past six years, there have been significant improvements and developments in
directional drilling technology. Staff is proposing to conduct a new and separate demonstration
project using improved directional drilling technology developed by Underground Construction
RE~EWEDANDRECOMMENDEDFORBOARDAcnON
RAB
IN'TCS~ PT.""v.
1302A-7/91 CWS
//1
JSM
(}1JP
I'"
SUBJECT
ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING DIRECTIONAL DRILLLlNG
DEMONSTRATION PROJECT AND AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL
MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH
UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. FOR THE
KNOX DRIVE SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT, DISTRICT
PROJECT NO. 4602
PAGE 2 OF 6
DATE
February 24, 1995
Company, Inc. of Benicia, California. Underground Construction has been a utility and heavy
engineering contractor for almost 60 years. The company began using directional drilling
technology to install utility pipelines five years ago. For this project, the company will be using
a custom fabricated directional rig.
The directional drilling system used by Underground Construction Company, Inc. is different in
several aspects from the directional drilling systems used by Flow Mole Corporation in the previous
demonstration projects. The principal differences are: 1) a different shaped boring head, 2) a two
pressure flexible boring head to achieve better accuracy and control, 3) use of a higher operating
pressure for easier and faster boring, and 4) a more efficient bentonite drilling slurry system.
Staff has conducted a review of potential firms which might be capable of performing this project
with directional drilling, and has determined that only Underground Construction Company, Inc.
has the capability to perform the proposed work with directional drilling. Other firms which
currently utilize directional drillling do not use this technique for gravity pipelines, such as is the
case in the proposed project, but only for pressure pipelines and cable conduits which do not
require as much accuracy as gravity pieplines.
Exemption from bidding for this project is allowed under Public Contract's Code, Section 3400.
Staff believes that this project is exempt from bidding on two grounds. First, the project is exempt
as a field test or experimental project because: 1) sewer pipelines have not been installed at the
District using the improved directional drilling technology, and 2) one of the primary objectives of
the project is to demonstrate the applicability of using directional drilling technology on future
sewer construction projects. Second, since directional drilling is the most cost effective and
practical alternative in constructing this project, the public interest justifies utilizing the unique
technology offered by Underground Construction Company, Inc. as a sole source supplier.
A lump sum contract for $70,700 has been negotiated with Underground Construction Company,
Inc. The scope of this contract includes: mobilization and demobilization, installation of 330 feet
of HOPE sewer by directional drilling, installation of 75 feet of 8-inch HOPE sewer by open cut
construction in the transition area, construction of three manholes, re-routing and connection of
two existing sewer laterals, and removal of an existing manhole and the temporary sewer.
The total estimated construction cost for the project will be $135,000.00. This estimate includes
the work by Underground Construction, Inc. staff labor for public information, construction
management and inspection, and a contingency for unforeseen conditions. A summary of these
project costs is presented in Attachment 2. Construction of the Knox Drive replacement sewer
is included in the fiscal year 1994-95 Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) on pages CS-74 through
CS-76. The total project cost included in the CIB is $178,000.00.
1302B-7/91
,--------------------------- -----------
SUBJECT
ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING DIRECTIONAL DRILLLlNG
DEMONSTRATION PROJECT AND AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL
MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH
UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. FOR THE
KNOX DRIVE SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT, DISTRICT
PROJECT NO. 4602
PAGE 3
DATE
OF 6
February 24, 1995
This project has been evaluated by staff and it has been determined to be exempt from the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEOA) under District CEOA guidelines, Section 18.2,
because it involves only minor alterations of existing facilities with negligible or no expansion of
capacity. The Board of Directors approval of this project will constitute a finding that the project
is exempt from CEOA.
Recommendation: 1) Adopt a resolution: a.) finding that pursuant to Public Contracts Code,
Section 3400 (b) that entering into a contract for use of Underground Construction Company,
Inco's directional drilling technology is required in order that the District may perform a field test
or experiment to determine the suitability of the technology for future District use, and b.)
determining that the public interest in utilizing the most cost effective and practical alternative
requires utilizing the unique technology of Underground Construction Company, Inc. as a sole
source supplier. 2) Authorize the General Manager-Chief Engineer to execute a contract with
Underground Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of $70,700.00 for construction of the
Knox Drive Sewer Replacement Project, DP 4602.
13028-7/91
1'..-.---.
ORINDA
,0(0 Fr(j
Overhill
Q
~5',
-j
,
~
;~:
<.J;',
~
\"
;;;
'r
\.J
>.
'"
o
u
""
\.
~
;:
,n
"
Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District
,.
en
m
,
~
>-
W
---l
---l
<(
>
>-
CL
CL
<(
I
0::
W
Q
Q
:::>
Los Arabis Dr
EI
- I
I -
O\t>-BlO
--....
PROJECT AREA
/
LA FA YETTE
~
N
~
--....
--.... 0
--.... L.._
--....
4
8
.. J
FEET
--....
---....
BLvD
....
ATTACHMENT
KNOX DRIVE SEWER REPLACEMENT
DP 4602
1
ATTACHMENT 2
COST ESTIMATE
Construction:
Directional Drilling by Underground Construction Co.
HOPE Sewer Pipe
Paving/Slurry Seal/Restoration
House Plumbing Relocations
Contingency (18%)
$70,700
3,500
4,500
6,000
15,300
SUBTOTAL
$100,000
Construction Management:
Project Management
Inspectionl Administration
$ 5 ,000
18,000
SUBTOTAL
$23,000
Services During Construction:
Engineering
Survey
Legal
Community Relations
Collection System Operations
Record Drawings
Field Office Support
Permit
$ 3,500
2,000
500
1 ,000
1,500
1 ,000
500
2,000
SUBTOTAL
$12,000
Planning/Design/Easement Acquisition
(Costs incurred to date)
$92,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST
FUNDS ALLOCATED TO DATE
$227,000
$93,000
ALLOCATION REQUIRED TO COMPLETE PROJECT
$134,000
C:\WP8OlSW ANSONICOST.EST
-----r----.--------------------
ATTACHMENT 3
PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY
FOR THE PERIOD
03/10/95 THROUGH
04/09/95
SEWER CONSTRUCTION FUND BALANCE AS OF
02/28/95**
$68,300,000
MINUS UNSPENT PRIOR ALLOCATIONS
(39,700,000)
PLUS DEPENDABLE CURRENT YEAR REVENUE
(1/95 THROUGH 6/95)
3,600,000
$32,200,000
$32,200,000
> $134,000
(ALLOCATION
REQUIRED)
**Balance includes the unspent proceeds of the 1994 Capital Tax and Revenue antici-
pation Notes (TRANs), and the 1994 Revenue Installment Certificates (COPs). Out-
standing debt as of 3/31/95 is projected to be $35,737,334
I -----.---..------- .-----..-.--..-.
PAGE OF 2
NO.
7. PERSONNEL a.
SUBJECT
DATE
March 6, 1995
AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TO
ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH JERRY LEW &
ASSOCIATES FOR $33,500.
TYPE OF ACTION
AUTHORIZE AGREEMENT
SUBMITTED BY INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
Cathryn Freitas, Human Resources Manager Administrative/Human Resources
ISSUE: Board approval is required for professional consultant agreements exceeding $25,000
that are funded from the Operations and Maintenance Budget.
BACKGROUND: As the District downsizes and continues its efforts to maximize efficiency,
productivity, and cost-savings, employees are being asked to work together in different ways.
In order to enhance these new working arrangements, staff is recommending all District
employees participate in Cultural Diversity Training.
Specifically, the goal of Cultural Diversity Training is to increase the skills, knowledge, and
awareness of District employees so they can work together more effectively within a diverse
workforce. The training is designed to provide participants with a better understanding of the
following:
1. What culture is and how culture influences us in the workplace;
2. The sources of cultural conflict and ways to deal with it;
3. Stereotyping and how to avoid problems associated with stereotyping; and
4. Barriers to effective cross-cultural communication and tools to communicate m.:>re
effectively.
The individual chosen as a trainer is Mr. Jerry Lew of Lew and Associates. He is a nationally-
known trainer, having previously been in charge of corporate diversity for Levi-Strauss and
Kaiser-Permanente. In addition to his consulting business, Mr. Lew is on the faculty at San
Francisco State University teaching in its Multi-Cultural Diversity Program. Mr. Lew was
interviewed based on excellent references from other public and private sector individuals.
Prior to requesting Board approval, staff had Mr. Lew meet with a focus group of nine
employees to ascertain the culture and needs of the District. He subsequently was
interviewed by the Management Team. Finally, he presented an all-day pilot program to a
cross-section of the District, including the Affirmative Action Committee, Management Team,
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
~
INITIATING DEPT./DIV.
1302A-7/91 CRF
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TO
ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH JERRY LEW &
ASSOCIATES FOR $33.500.
PAGE 2 OF 2
DATE
March 6. 1995
and two additional employee representatives from each Department. Uniformly. the training
was rated as outstanding and useful by the participants.
The total cost of the training for the pilot program. management/supervisor orientation. and
delivery of twelve seven-hour training sessions is $33.500. In order for all the employees to
have the same communication tools and the training to have the most impact. all District
employees will be required to attend.
This is part of the District's on-going training efforts. An evaluation and consideration of any
follow-up activities will be done at the conclusion of the training.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the General Manager-Chief Engineer to enter into an
agreement with Jerry Lew and Associates in the amount of $33.500 for the purpose of
Cultural Diversity Training.
1302B-7/91