HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA BACKUP 07-02-98
~
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Page 1 of 2
BOARD MEETING OF
NO,
July 2, 1998
3. CONSENT CALENDAR a.
DATE
TYPE OF ACTION
June 25, 1998
ACCEPT ANNEXATION FOR PROCESSING
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZATION FOR P.A. 98-7 (WALNUT CREEK) TO BE INCLUDED IN A FUTURE FORMAL
ANNEXATION TO THE DISTRICT
SUBMITTED BY
Dennis Hall, Associate Engineer
INITIATING DEPT/DIV
Engineering Department/Environmental Services
Parcel
No.
Area
Owner/Address
Parcel No. & Acreage
Leonard & Michael Saputo
1967 Woodpecker Court
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Remarks
Lead Agency
APN: 135-050-028 (0.10 Ac.)
Existing house with a
failing septic system;
must connect to the
public sewer system.
Project is exempt from
CEOA.
CCCSD
98-7
Walnut
Creek
(50C5)
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize P.A. 98-7 to be included in a future formal annexation.
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED FOR BOARD ACTION
DH
INITIATING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION
lOti
U:\PPr\Kast\ANNX98-7.DH
__............--._.___~_m__.__"_______..____....____________.__~__.,_.__.________,_~...,..._.,"__,._ -. - ,-....------.-..-- _..M.__'______..___.__H._..____.__._,._...,___
Page 2 of 2
@
'69
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
P.A.98-7
8/6/96
U:\PPr\Kast\ANNX98-7.DH
4&
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
::::::::::::::ii'I1<:;:;:;::"Ii.:'I.:.ffil.:.:.ci::::::ijiAlMl:iij:::::::::11' BOARD MEETING OF
~~~j~~\~~~~~~~Ii~~~~::;;~;;;;::~~IB~::::~~1~!I::::.'lj~jjjjlili[.!$~~Hi.rmmmI July 2, 1 998
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
Page 1 of 3
NO.
DATE
TYPE OF ACTION
June 25, 1998
SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING
SUBJECT
ESTABLISH AUGUST 6,1998, AS THE DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE COMMENTS
ON PROPOSED REIMBURSEMENT FEES FOR THE AREA TRIBUTARY TO THE DOUGHERTY TUNNEL
AND TRUNK SEWERS PROJECT
SUBMITTED BY
Jarred Miyamoto-Mills, Principal Engineer
INIT1A TlNG DEPT,{)tV
Engineering/Environmental Services
ISSUE: When Reimbursement Fees are proposed for an area tributary to a "special facility," the
District Code requires that a public hearing be held prior to the Board of Directors' consideration of
the fee proposal for adoption.
BACKGROUND: The Dougherty Tunnel and Trunk Sewers project involves design and construction
of "special facilities," as defined in the District Code, to be paid for by the Dougherty Valley
developers. The Code provides for the establishment of Reimbursement Fees to fairly and equitably
distribute a proportional share of the costs for these facilities to all other properties which may be
served by the tunnel and trunk sewers.
Attachment 1 shows the areas tributary to the tunnel and trunk sewers which will be built to serve
the Dougherty Valley. A separate agreement between the District, Shapell Industries of Northern
California, and Windemere Ranch Partners has established a cost sharing arrangement for the Shapell,
Windemere, West Branch and Wendt Ranch areas. The proposed Reimbursement Fees would be
collected from property owners in the Lawrence Road and "Intervening Properties" areas when they
connect to the sewer system, and disbursed to the installers of the tunnel and trunk sewer facilities.
The proposed Reimbursement Fee has been calculated by dividing the total estimated project cost for
the facilities by the number of residential units which will be served by the facilities. The proposed
Reimbursement Fee is $2,500 per residential unit. This fee would be charged in addition to Facilities
Capacity and Pumped Zone Fees (now $2,920), and other District charges, such as those for plan
review and inspection.
The District Code requires that a notice of the public hearing be given at least ten days in advance
to owners of properties to which the fees would be applicable. The notice will include a general
description of the reimbursement fee program, a description of the facilities to be installed which give
rise to the proposed fee, and the proposed initial amount of the fee.
INITIATING DEPARTMENTIDIVISlON
1/
JMM
H:\DA T A \POSPAPER\07-02LA WR. WPD
4/8/98
DATE
June 25, 1998
Page 2 of 3
SUBJECT
ESTABLISH AUGUST 6,1998, AS THE DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE COMMENTS
ON PROPOSED REIMBURSEMENT FEES FOR THE AREA TRIBUTARY TO THE DOUGHERTY TUNNEL
AND TRUNK SEWERS PROJECT
RECOMMENDAll0N: Establish the Board's regularly scheduled meeting on August 6, 1998, as the
date for a public hearing to receive comments on proposed Reimbursement Fees for properties to be
served by the Dougherty Tunnel and Trunk Sewer project.
H:\DA T A \POSPAPER\07-02LA WR. WPD
4/8/98
-----------......--------.-.-.-..-....-.-----.-.-.-....-.....-..--....----------
Page 3 of 3
I'"
.go
~
..3
I
5
"'C
/
a.
"
o
"'C
~ Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District
BOUNDARY OF AREA TRIBUTARY TO TUNNEL
- . - .. CREEKS
ATTACHMENT
AREA TRIBUTARY TO THE DOUGHERTY
VALLEY TUNNEL AND TRUNK SEWERS
'"
~
~
1
00
'"
S!l
-~
<> ,
~~
--_.~---_.._...,_......_~_._._.._._.__..__._-_.~'_.._-'-,----,-_._--------,_.,_..,~._------------_._-'_.,~-"._-_._.---,_.- -...,
~
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Page 1 of 2
BOARD MEETING OF
NO.
July 2, 1998
.CONSENT CALENDAR c.
DATE
TYPE OF ACTION
June 25, 1998
SET HEARING DATE
AUTHORIZE LETTER
SUBJECT
ESTABLISH AUGUST 6, 1998, AS THE DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER PLACING
DELINQUENT CONNECTION FEES ON THE PROPERTY TAX BILL FOR 55 LONGRIDGE ROAD IN
ORINDA, CALIFORNIA. AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF A LETTER TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR-
CONTROLLER.
SUBMITTED BY
Dennis Hall, Associate Engineer
INITIATING DEPT/DIV
Engineering Department/Environmental Services
ISSUE: The record parcel owner of 55 Longridge Road, Mr. Michael Gonce, has not paid connection
fees. Nonpayment of connection fees is a violation of Title 6 of the District Code. In order to place the
delinquent fees on the property tax bill for the subject property, a public hearing must be held.
BACKGROUND: At the May 7, 1998 Board Meeting, the Board conducted a hearing and authorized
staff to file suit in Small Claims Court against Mr. Gonce to recover the past-due fees. Mr. Gonce was
notified of this hearing but did not appear. This action was originally recommended by staff because the
property was for sale. If the property was transferred to a bonafide purchaser prior to the date a
delinquency could be established and entered against the assessment roll, the lien would not be attached
to the parcel, but would be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection. However, the property has
recently been taken off the market and the immediacy of the action in Small Claims Court is no longer
necessary. Therefore, certification of the amount of unpaid fees, with penalties and interest, to the
County Auditor-Controller is the preferred method of collection.
The County Auditor-Controller has requested to be informed of the process the Board intends to follow.
A draft letter informing the Auditor-Controller is attached. Staff will provide additional information in
conjunction with the public hearing.
RECOMMENDATION: Establish August 6, 1998, as the date for a public hearing to receive public
comment and to request that the County place the delinquent connection fees on the tax bill for the
subject property. Authorize the Board president to execute a letter informing the County Auditor-
Controller of the intended process.
DH
lit
INEER
INITIATING DEPARTMENTIDIVISION
1Jf'
JSM
U :\PPr\Kast\GONCEHRG .DH. wpd
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place, Martinez, CA 94553-4392 · (510) 228-9500
FAX: (925) 228-4624
ROGER J DOLAN
General Manager
Chief Engineer
KENTON L ALM
Counsel for the District
(925) 938-/430
JOYCE E MURPHY
Secretary of the District
July 2, 1998
Mr. Paul Abelson
Principal Accountant
Office of the Contra Costa County Auditor-Controller
Tax Division
625 Court Street, Finance Building
Martinez, CA 94553
DRAFT
Dear Mr. Abelson:
DELINQUENT CONNECTION FEES ADDED TO THE TAX ROLL
The Central Contra Costa Sanitary District's (District) Board of Directors at its meeting on
July 2, 1998, established August 6, 1998, as the date for a public hearing for the purpose
of placing delinquent connection fees on the tax bill for Assessor's Parcel No. 273-063-
018-9. A resolution to that effect will be on the Board agenda on August 6, 1998, for
adoption.
Please establish the necessary accounts for the purpose of placing said fees on the
County Assessment Roll.
Sincerely,
James A. Nejedly
President of the Board of Directors
JSM/JAN:msf
U :\Admin\McCoy\abelson .Itr. wpd
@ RrcYcled Paper
~
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Page 1 of 1
BOARD MEETING OF
NO.
JULY 2, 1998
6. ENGINEERING a.
DATE
TYPE OF ACTION
June 25, 1998
SUPPORT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZE THE SUBMISSION OF BALLOTS IN FAVOR OF THE FORMATION OF THE ALHAMBRA
CREEK ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
SUBMITIED BY
Jay S. McCoy, Environmental Services
Division Manager
ISSUE: The City of Martinez is proposing the formation of an assessment district, the boundary of which
encompasses two properties owned by Central Contra Costa Sanitary District.
INITIATING DEPT /DIV
Engineering Department-Environmental Services
BACKGROUND: Alhambra Creek has a history of flooding. The Alhambra Creek Flood Task Force
appointed by the Martinez City Council has identified three projects that, when implemented, would help
mitigate the flooding. The City has secured or is in the process of securing $6,948,850 in grants and
other public contributions toward the costs of the three projects. The City is proposing a $1,500,000
assessment district to finance the remaining costs of the projects. The properties included within the
proposed assessment district are those non-residential and non-recreational properties from Green Street
north to the Carquinez Strait that lie within the 100-year flood plan.
The District owns two properties within the proposed assessment district. One property includes the
Martinez Pumping Station. The second property is to the east of the station. One property is proposed
to be assessed $3,542 and the other $1,962. The City has forwarded Notices of Assessments and
ballots to the District and other owners of property within the proposed assessment district. The
proposed assessment district can be formed if the number of ballots returned in favor of the proposed
assessment are greater than those returned in opposition.
The District and City have recently entered into cooperative agreements to jointly improve sewers and
streets within the City. The widening of Alhambra Creek will benefit the District by lessening the amount
of flood waters which enter the District's sanitary sewer system, significantly reducing the likelihood of
permit violations. Supporting the formation of the assessment district is another opportunity to illustrate
the District's cooperation with local public agencies. The submission of ballots supporting the proposed
assessments and favoring the formation of the proposed assessment district is warranted.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the submission of ballots in favor of the formation of the Alhambra
Creek Assessment District. Authorize payment of the assessment amounts conditioned on the successful
formation of the assessment district.
INITIATING DEPARTM7~~
JSM
U :\PPr\Kast\AlhCrk.jsm. wpd
~
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
...............................................................................................
..............................................................................................
:I~~.~rl.~I...m:';:;:;::..:.I::::::~?~:~~~:::::::::::::::~ BOARD MEETlNG OF
mmlrn:.9~::::::::!:::::):::::::::::::::llf::gmm::e!l:m:m:::f July 2, 1998
Page 1 of 3
NO.
6. ENGINEERING b.
DATE
TYPE OF ACTION
June 25, 1998
AUTHORIZE ACTION
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZE STAFF TO PURSUE ESTABUSHING ACCESS RIGHTS TO AND ACROSS THE DISTRICT'S
EASEMENT ON PROPERTY OWNED BY CARL D. DAME'
SUBMITTED BY
Jay S. McCoy, Environmental Services
Division Mana er
INITIATING DEPTIDIV
Engineering/Environmental Services
JSSUf: Access to a District easement by a private engineer has been denied by the owner of property
across which the District has a recorded easement.
BACKGROUND: Mr. Norman Schlinger has purchased an existing home at 2451 Ridgewood Road in
Alamo. The home is currently served by a septic tank which is failing. Mr. Schlinger cannot move into
his new home until 1) the septic tank is repaired or 2) the home is connected to the District's public
sewer system. Mr. Schlinger wants to expand the existing home, which will require that the home be
connected to the District's public sewer system. Mr. Schlinger's chosen course of action is to connect
his home to the District's system.
Mr. Schlinger has a sanitary sewer easement in Ridgewood Road which is a private road. The District
has a sanitary sewer easement between the end of Ridgewood Road and the end of the District's
sewer system across a portion of the driveway to the Dame' residence. A map showing the schematic
location of a public sewer extension is attached.
Mr. Schlinger has been in communication with Mr. Michael Rupprecht, attorney for Mr. Dame',
regarding use of the District's easement for the public sewer extension to the Schlinger property. At
first and specifically on May 14, 1998, Mr. Rupprecht by letter gave permission to use the District's
easement (across the Dame' driveway) provided that certain conditions were met. These conditions
were acceptable to Mr. Schlinger. Mr. Rupprecht has apparently rescinded the permission and
recommended that Mr. Schlinger use an alternate sewer alignment which could avoid the Dame'
driveway. This alternate alignment was evaluated by District staff and found to be unacceptable.
Mr. Rupprecht's current position is that access to the Dame' driveway is denied for purposes related
to the extension of a public sewer, although discussions are continuing. Mr. Schlinger's engineer needs
to go onto the Dame' driveway to take measurements to design the public sewer extension and has
been denied access to date.
INITIATlNGD~EN~i~~
JSM
U :\PPr\Kast\OAME .JSM. wpd
4/8/98
DATE
June 25, 1998
Page 2 of 3
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZE STAFF TO PURSUE ESTABLISHING ACCESS RIGHTS TO AND ACROSS THE
DISTRICTS EASEMENT ON PROPERTY OWNED BY CARL D. DAME'
Mr. and Mrs. Dame' are in ill health. Mr. Rupprecht has expressed concern about the need to
maintain continuous emergency access over the Dame' driveway. Providing continuous access will
be one of the conditions placed on the sewer construction project. Mr. Rupprecht has raised other
technical questions. Staff has considered these questions and believes that the technical issues raised
can be sufficiently mitigated or addressed in the design of the project.
Mr. Schlinger has made a good faith effort to attempt to gain access to the District's easement
across the Dame' driveway for the design and construction of a public sewer extension. The
negotiations between Mr. Schlinger and Mr. Rupprecht are proceeding, but Mr. Schlinger is concerned
that he is not going to be able to gain the needed access. Mr. Schlinger has turned to District staff
for assistance. Since the District has a recorded easement over the Dame' driveway, it is
appropriate for the District to provide needed access to the easement for Mr. Schlinger's engineer and
contractor. Further near-term negotiations may resolve the issues. Failing such a resolution, the
District may need to seek a court order setting forth the District's right of access to provide for design
and construction of a public sewer across the Dame' property.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize staff to pursue establishing access rights to and across a District
easement.
U :\PPr\Kast\DAME.JSM. wpd
4/8/98
Page 3 of 3
SCHl/NGER PROPERTY
s
/
. ~
\_!,~\l"
\ ,
\ "
\ ..
" ,,'
\ i
- --\- -...-.. --- --.
'..... ..................
"
"
"
'l
. ''-'........., 13 \1 ..
. ............... \ >>Z .
-....-1-~~...
9 l? ) 4 J
LAW OFFICES OF
MICHAEL W. RUPPRECHT
18 CROW CANYON COURT. SUITE 160
SAN RAMON, CALIFORNIA 94583
(925) 837-0867
FAX: (925) 837-6104
May 14, 1998
r ~~'1~'1~3~~
Gene DeBolt
DeBOLT CIVIL ENGINEERING
811 San Ramon Valley Boulevard
Danville, California 94526
----.-.-.--.-.--....---....
Re: Dame' / Sewer Easement
Dear Gene:
You have had discussions with Rick Dame' concerning your client's
requested sewer easement through property owned by Mr. Carl Dame'
in Alamo. Rick Dame' also met you on the site. I believe that he
also explained to you the serious health condition of both Mr. and
Mrs. Dame'. That condition could become an emergency at any time
and therefore any street work would need to provide full and
complete access not only to pedestrian vehicles, but emergency
vehicles, 24 hours a day. The following are my clients' conditions
to your requested easement:
1. Access ingress and egress must be fully available 24
hours a day;
2. We would need a construction schedule showing when
construction would start and stop for the full project, as well as
daily working hours;
3. Your client will be responsible for any damage to the
roadway, surrounding landscaping, retaining walls, and the electric
gate, as well as any other damage caused by installation of the
sewer easement and related work;
4. Any open trenching needs to be covered by a steel
cover;
5. The driveway upon completion of work needs to be sand
and slurry sealed down from the top of the driveway where the sewer
work will end down to the automatic gate;
Gene DeBolt
DeBOLT CIVIL ENGINEERING
May 14, 1998
Page 2
6. Your client will be responsible to provide an
insurance certificate for Mr. Dame' to ~rotect him against any
claims or injuries as a result of the construction and workers and
others entering his private property. That insurance certificate
should be for not less than $500,000.00.
Should you have any questions, please let me know.
/l
Very truly yours,
'I
// ~ ~ -
../ /~I /I .~ ----
1// / j,. &/i./------
/ <.-
Michael W. Rupprecht
MWR:pcl
cc: Rick Dame'
[c:\wp51\cddame\debolt.ltr]
\) A-(V1fl- Cv~~c., C/o -
2070
5 NV (l ~ ~.tV' lJ~ U (>;1 lLt/lJ r
<.1 L /,,-
) 1-
-:
r J 7 - b fLIt(
~
June 7, 1998
Mr. Michael Rupprecht
18 Crow Canyon Court - Suite 160
San Ramon, CA 94583
Dear Mr. Rupprecht,
I am the new homeowner of 2451 Ridgewood Road in Alamo, CA.
Please refer to your letter dated May 14, 1998 written on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Carl
Dame. Your letter was in response to my plan to extend the sewer located on the Dame's property
in Alamo on Via Romero to my property on Ridgewood Road utilizing the County Sanitary
District's existing easement on the Dame's property.
I found the Dame's conditions (detailed in your letter) acceptable and I understand Gene
DeBolt, my engineer, acknowledged this verbally and was preparing to proceed with surveying
for the sewer extension per your letter. However this past week Mr. DeBolt advised that your
client now prefers we connect to a different sewer line. A sewer line found on his neighbor's
property immediately to the west of the Dame's.
The County Staff has indicated the easement through the Dame's property is the best
location. I need to get the sewer connection accomplished as soon as possible. This is because
the work we plan to do on my home will make it uninhabitable during construction. We can not
properly plan for the work until the sewer connection is a certainty. I have no objection to
consideration of alternate locations for the sewer if it will promote good neighborhood relations,
provided I am not penalized financially for the delays in doing so.
I therefore make the following proposal:
1. The Dame's proceed with whatever steps are necessary to determine the best location
for the sewer line extension for Ridgewood Road and obtain the County's approval for that
location (including the absorption of any expenses related to that determination and approval).
2. The Dame's obtain or provide all necessary property easements for the new location,
and pay any expenses related to obtaining those easements.
3. I will pay for the construction of the sewer, as I would have on the existing easement
on the Dame's property. My expense will, however, be limited to what my expense would have
been for the sewer line on the Dame's property. Additional construction expenses, if any,
beyond those I would have incurred on the existing easement will be paid for by the Dame's.
4. All of the necessary easements and approvals will be obtained within 90 days so that
construction of the sewer may be commenced on the 91 st day on one of the two locations. This
90 day period will begin Monday June 22, 1998 with construction able to begin on one of the two
locations no later than Monday September 21, 1998 (the 91 st day).
If the necessary approvals and easements can not obtained by the Dame's so that
construction can begin on September 21, 1998, the Dame's agree to grant unobstructed access to
their property on that same day so that the sewer extension can be accomplished as originally
planned by my Engineer and construction firm subject to no additional conditions beyond those
detailed in your May 14th letter.
5. Recognizing the economic burden to me of this delay, the Dame's will reimburse me
for the cost of ownership of my property while a new sewer location is being developed and made
available. That cost is $162 per day. To accomplish this reimbursement, a sum equivalent to 90
days of this ownership costs (not less than $14,580) will be placed in a trust account. This cost of
ownership, $1 62/day, would be paid to me for each day of delay that the sewer alternative takes
to complete, not to exceed a total of $14,580 with the balance of the fund to be returned to the
Dames once construction of the sewer is complete.
I look forward to hearing from you soon on this proposal, but not later than June 19th,
regarding the Dame's commitment to this proposal. We will concurrently be seeking alternative
approaches to obtain the sewer connection the County requires of me as a homeowner on
Ridgewood.
Very truly yours,
4~;:~
Norman W. Schlinger
1049 Pine Lane
Lafayette, CA 94549
cc
Mr. Rick Dame
Dame' Construction Company
2070 San Ramon Valley Blvd
San Ramon, CA 94583
Mr. Gene DeBolt
De Bolt Construction
811 San Ramon Valley Blvd
Sttfl RUlllUll, CA 94526
'OA-M-'lUIt.-
Mr. Jack Schlendorf
Heritage Real Estate
3249 Mt. Diablo Blvd - Suite 101
Lafayette, CA 94549
LAW OFFICES OF
MICHAEL W. RUPPRECHT
18 CROW CANYON COURT. SUITE 160
SAN RAMON. CALIFORNIA 94583
(925) 837-0867
FAX: (925) 837-6104
June 12, 1998
Norman W. schlinger
1049 pine Lane
Lafayette, California 94549
Re: Sewer Line
Dear Mr. Schlinger:
I am in receipt of your letter dated June 7, 1998 and have
forwarded the same to my client for his review. As you may be
aware, Mr. and Mrs. Dame' are both advanced in age, very ill, and
require full-time care. In the past, Mr. Dame' has been rushed to
the hospital by emergency vehicles. Mrs. Dame' is undergoing
chemotherapy and is subject to emergency treatment at any time. I
appreciate your conciliatory approach to the easement and
understand what you would like to accomplish. My primary concern,
however, is for the health and safety of Mr. and Mrs. Dame' and
making sure that they have unrestricted 24-hour access of ingress
and egress. We believe that there is an alternate sewer alignment
that would serve your property which would not require going down
Mr. and Mrs. Dame's driveway. With your cooperation, we should be
successful in doing that. I will be getting back to you shortly.
~trYlY.~.~ours /"
/ / . c1'(~L-----/
~~hael W. Rupprecht
MWR:pcl
cc: Mr. and Mrs. Carl Dame'
[c:\wp51\cddame\schlinger.ltr]
~.
A)>>~
June 17, 1998
Mr. Michael Rupprecht
18 Crow Canyon Court - Suite 160
San Ramon, CA 94583
Dear Mr. Rupprecht,
I received your June 12 letter, confirming receipt of my June 7 letter and reaffirming your
belief that there is an acceptable alternate sewer alignment (on the parcel to the west of the
Dame's property) that would not require going down the Dame's driveway. Also, again pointing
out the potential need for emergency medical treatment for either or both Mr. and Mrs. Dame.
As my engineer verbally indicated, and my June 7th letter states, we are willing to abide
by all of the conditions found in your May 14th letter in which you anticipated the need for 24
access for emergency medical vehicles. The engineering firm I have hired indicated there would
be no problem with any of your letter's conditions, including the 24 hour access.
Your June 12th letter doesn't indicate what, if any, progress you or the Dame's have
made in obtaining the necessary easements from the appropriate property owners for the alternate
alignment. However, to move things forward (to minimize the inconvenience and economic
burden the delay in the sewer plan is already causing) we met with the Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District on Monday the 15th to discuss the existing easement on the Dame property and
the alternate alignment you propose.
The CCCSD advised us that they have physically inspected the site and that the proposed
alternate alignment is "an unacceptable location to the CCCSD". As a consequence they will not
approve a plan to locate the sewer there. Therefore the proposal I made in my previous letter,
allowing up to 90 days to accomplish an alternate alignment (provided funds were placed in Trust
for the purpose of offsetting our economic hardship) appears to now be unworkable.
I believe we must move forward with the construction on the existing easement (if for no
other reason, because it is the only location the CCCSD will accept). I would appreciate hearing
from you that we may proceed with our original plan, subject to the conditions found in your May
14th letter.
As an alternative, the people at the CCCSD felt that if the only concern is 24 hour access
for emergency vehicles, why not allow the Dame's to perform the construction of the sewer
extension themselves or with a construction firm with whom they feel comfortable? That seems a
reasonable solution to us. If the Dame's elect to construct the extension, it would of course have
to comply with all of the CCCSD's requirements. We would reimburse the Dame's for the costs
of construction up to what the cost of the sewer would have been if we contracted to have it built
and provided there is no delay in obtaining CCCSD approval and the construction is completed in
as timely a manner as it would have been if we arranged for it.
Mr. Rupprecht, I feel that both of the proposals I have made are very reasonable and are
in the spirit of cooperation and good neighborhood relations. While the first one is now moot, due
to the CCCSD position, this latest one suggested by the CCCSD will certainly have their support.
I look forward to hearing from you soon on this latest proposal, but again not later than June 19th,
regarding the Dame's position and commitment to this proposal. I am FAXing it to you today
expecting that you are in the process of discussing and coming to some conclusions this week
with the Dame's.
Please feel free to call me at (925) 284-8335 if you have any questions and with word on
our proceeding with our survey, design and construction.
cc
Mr. Rick Dame
Dame' Construction Company
2070 San Ramon Valley Blvd
San Ramon, CA 94583
Mr. Gene DeBolt
De Bolt Construction
811 San Ramon Valley Blvd
Danville, CA 94526
Mr. Jack Schlendorf
Heritage Real Estate
3249 Mt. Diablo Blvd - Suite 101
Lafayette, CA 94549
Very truly yours,
Norman W. Schlinger
1049 Pine Lane
Lafayette, CA 94549
Mr. Charles W. Batts
Director of Engineering
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553-4329
Mr. Jay McCoy
Infrastructure Divsion Manager
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553-4329
Mr. Kent Aim - CCCSD General Counsel
Sellar, Hazard Law Firm
300 Civic - Suite 300
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
~ Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
- BOARD OF DIRECTORS Page 1 of 3
.1'1.11111:~llilil:.II:I~.:I:I:.:I~I:I:I~:~I~III~I:I:.!:!.!.!!.I!I~.i:!I'I.I'.!I::'li:'I'I'I~I'li BOARD MEETlj~l~ 2, 1 998
NO.
6. ENGINEERING
DATE
TYPE OF ACTION
June 25, 1998
CONSIDER PROPOSAL
SUBJECT
CONSIDER THE FORMATION OF A CONTRACTUAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR PROPERTIES ON
CHARLES HILL CIRCLE AND HARTFORD ROAD IN ORINDA
SUBMITTED BY
Dennis Hall, Associate Engineer
INITIATING DEPTIDIV
Engineering Department/Environmental Services
ISSUE: Owners of properties on Charles Hill Circle and Hartford Road in Orinda have expressed an
interest in connecting their homes to Central Contra Costa Sanitary District's (CCCSD) sewer system
and have requested formation of a contractual assessment district to finance the extension of the
public system. Board approval is required to form the assessment district.
BACKGROUND: A group of property owners whose properties are located on Charles Hill Circle and
Hartford Road in Orinda have contacted CCCSD staff to obtain information regarding connecting
their homes to CCCSD's public sewer system. Ten of these owners have written letters requesting
that a contractual assessment district (C.A.D.) be formed. There is a total of 17 properties (12
properties on Charles Hill Circle and 5 properties on Hartford Road) that would benefit from the
extension of an 8-inch diameter public sewer presently located in an easement on number 10 Charles
Hill Circle. The ten owners who are interested in connecting their homes own 1 2 of the 17
properties that will be served by the C.A.D. sewer extension. One of these owners owns three
properties. These owners have contacted the other five owners to determine if those owners are
also interested. The other five owners do not wish public sanitary sewer service at this time, nor
do they wish to participate in a C.A.D.
The addresses of the properties of the improved properties are numbers 15, 16, 25, 27, 29, 31, and
33 Charles Hill Circle; 1 and 5 Hartford Road. The Assessor's Parcel Nos. of the unimproved
properties are 260-071-006, 260-040-006, and 260-040-004. The sewer extension that would
serve these properties is shown on Attachment 1. One of the basic premises associated with a
C.A.D. is that the properties served by the sewer improvement are to be included within a C.A.D.
Thus, if a C.A.D. were formed for the 12 properties whose owners are interested in sewer service,
the remaining five properties would be included within the boundary of the C.A.D.
~v
DH
#~
INITIATING DEPARTMENTIDIVISION
CWS
JSM
U:\Plan Review\Hall\CHiIICAD\FORMCAD3.WPD
9/16/96
DATE
June 25, 1998
Page 2 of 3
SUBJECT
CONSIDER THE FORMATION OF A CONTRACTUAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR PROPERTIES ON
CHARLES HILL CIRCLE AND HARTFORD ROAD IN ORINDA
If a C.A.D. is formed, the owners of the 12 properties will be assessed for the total cost of the
C.A.D. Reimbursement fees will be established later in the process to form the C.A.D. The
reimbursement fees will be collected from the owners who do not participate in the C.A.D.
representing these owners' share of the cost of the C.A.D. These fees will be collected when homes
on the non-participant's properties are connected to the public sewer.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the formation of a C.A.D., consisting of 17 properties to be formed
on Charles Hill Circle and Hartford Road, and direct staff to begin processing said C.A.D.
,-
ATTACHMENT 1
Page 3 of 3 .
C.A D BOUNDAR
COYN[
COOK · V ~
260-0.040-006 N
,
COOK .
0 250 500
COOK . V FEET
260~O-00.04
DIERKAS .
JACOBS
LOCAT I~ MAP
LEGEND
17 PROPERTIES
10 PARTICIPANTS
(12 PARCELS)
5 NON-PARTICIPANTS
-.-.. PROPOSED SEWER
e EXISTING SEWER
--- C.A.D BOUNDARY
lID . PART I C I PANTS
V VACANT PARCELS
CD
;
Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District
CD
'"
2!
'6~
. '
E~
PROPOSED BOUNDARY OF
CHARLES HILL CIRCLE
CONTRACTUAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
CAD 98-2
ATTACHMENT
1
~ -';; , i I
H " '~';' ; ,~. "
SEP 2 6 M1
> ,~,~ ~_~TiJ F~ E
15 Che.rles }=ill Drive
Orinda, CA, 94563
September 24th 1907
l~:r. J a:,r l::c C o:t-
Infrastructure Division 1~naeer
Central Contra Costa Sahitary District
5019 Inhoff Place
Marti~ez, CA 94533
De8.r 1:r. .Mc C 0;;' ,
We want to form a Contractual AssesmeLt
District for Charles Rill Circle in Orinda.
We have ~ad two information meetings during
the past few months and found enough ixtere2t
a~ongst our neighbors to meet the requirements
of a "Ci'.D."
We are on aseptjc tark. A sewer ~ystem would
elir:l nate the nerj.odic Tlroblems"vlell as makir..L'"
~ J;' fA t
the property more attractive for sale.
Wo-u.ld apprec iate ~Tour approval of our re-
(~uest .
~Sinc.erelY r-. I
/-LJ~\,L L. 'rl~ <~o--
.~~seph L. Frledman
/
,.-
I',r=o. .1. ~ JCJ IH \'IJ ~ (~.'
",--i!!!:
i JlJ L. SEP 2 6 www.jUi,
! ~, . L..,.i )
! -~ -_.__J ;
"CCSD INFRkSTRUCTUP~:'
I ,1~
September 23, 1997
Mr. Jay McCoy
Infrastructure Division Manager
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Inhoff Place
Martinez CA 94553
Dear Mr. McCoy,
We want to form a Contractual Assessment District for Charles Hill Circle in Orinda. After
two information meetings in the last few months we believe there is enough interest among
our neighbors to meet the requirements of a "C.AD".
Our reasons for wanting to join the C.AD. are two: 1) our septic tank is 32 years old and
could fail at any time; 2) a C.AD. with full support by neighbors could be financially
feasible if formed now.
We, therefore, ask that the Central San Board approve our request at the earliest possible date.
~~ ~~~
Petrce McKee
~O-- 5 ~cUz-
Rosina S. McKee
tS- c.k~~ ~
~ l tA- ~t6?c/
.~
~
Jlt) ~'- ;y)' L '.\' .~ m'-
iI h).,.: j -"""-: ..:. '!';~~1 n
I uu OCT.. t. I Y
r Ln.. ~
. t{f~~.~~~:"~"- .
5 Hart ford Road
Orinda} California 94563
Oct. 3, 1997
Mr. Jay McCoy
Infrastructure Division Manager
Centra 1 Contra Costa Sani tary Oi stri ct
5019 mhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553
Dear Mr. McCoy}
We would be interested in establishing a Contractual Assessment District for the purpose of
providing a pubHc main extension of a sewer line on Charles Hill Circle in Orinde with the
provision of a minimum of 10 property homeowners sharing the financial expense that would be
incurred in the construction of a pubHe sewer main.
Thank you for your cont i nued consi derat ion.
Sincerely}
Donald D. Dierkes
~....'~~~
M~__ ~H_ ~ ~
'He1en ~;o;erkes
MICHAEL W. WOOD
P.O. Box 248
Murphy, OR 97533-0248
(541) 862-2735 · Fax (541) 862-9640
, f i; ;,':' n~' r'
i J ;'1
" ", lj'
U1J I OCT - 8 1997 ; ~.Ji
L_. __~~~
LCCCSD INFRASTRUCTURE
October 6, 1997
Mr. Jay McCoy
Infrastructure Division Manager
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
50 19 Inhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553
Dear Mr. McCoy:
I am most anxious to be a part of any "C.A.D." to serve my lot at 34 Charles Hill
Circle, Orinda (Assessor's Parcel Number 260-071-006-1).
Since it is no longer possible for me to hook up to the sewer which I started up
the canyon it seems this is my only alternative.
My reason for joining any such C.A.D. is very simple - to make my 1.4 acre
parcel buildable.
I therefore request that you approve a C.A.D. for this area as soon as possible. I
will very willingly participate.
Thank you.
~ ' ~,,), "",~J
, i /'
~/v/ ',,'
~.1/14
M"c;J;'el W. Wood
~
" ;
, '
, ..
! nt, OCT - 8 1991 f ~."
~...J L\ ~ ~ ;
/1//#"" '-7_/, A~ /~~"~.;I '~'~~;-D'I~"'~I~:~~~'';'f,;ir-/o:';'~ ,~' '/- / / 7 ~17
/ ~ /), ~ / -/ c- c.....- ~. ,-.'~'\..'.::J ,'" ,,.....'-'. ,'- ~ l1-P~ /. .c_
.---' --,,----
/~;rH~fr~rr/c~/'~ i7/1~ /-/b/77c'/'
C, ~', C' ....y;2//'/ ;/c.;/}~ /1/5).?-//c'/-;
-'5(7 /7 //Pl// i!'/,/,-/' /~;/~ c C
. /
/L/~///j?[7
~" ./.' .......:.",;. -- -
{_, '/ '/ ' '"-'/ /'::'J .::) ,'5
Z:-7/<."'7"'/
IJ0~
/2#JC; L~' V
/i- / /
/ '
/''7: /5 /..) /'/ J /-c-.*/[/- JC' ~::.
.~':
;//7 -(
/ /7 t' [ ;.-r;; /7 <'/
/
/,'"
,/' t' .'
/...t-::: /,/ //
,. v' .;"....-"
/
/ /
/,-.? /2C"
./ ,. /
'//i/ )'..-';?';' '/" -,',
,/ /.- /'"-~//~" ,'/,
.'/
?
J ,<,'/,: ---c;~~
, 4
..~.
...F,/ "
/>, / .;.' /7 e:'~ ~ /c',';'
/:....,.~. //
" /, ~
/~- -' - />
G. //L/(',
-/- / './/' '.7"
" / ~/--; /(;.'--/ /
" . / ,//
_>, //// /// ,7/1(
//'/r:',/;X/, ~~//r ':/
. :~/ ?~>:J-'l l/;c'/ c,;- /'}-?//l~ h
// ''z.'l// // Y t:/l (
.-:
/
" . ,~, ..- ,J!' .,,/
/,//, erE, ~/cCo/
j "
/: '
,{; ./, .-;"" ~.(
r ,-. -.....
/':: .:-? /...!-
/":' ;/;(( ,/'/t'fXc"// c',',L/ /;:q,,' // ';;'
/ ..
/"/::" ,T;-//'/'(/ .7c:.,,///,,(
/
/2/"/( ;'.:"i ,./ /';)
/
/
/ ~~ // (' C ,//:..-- /
/
:;> c'/' ( / . / / /. " r'
~-
..--.J ///~-'~ /,~ ,t'
/
,/,' /;;
... -... "'-
-.-.. / , :
l.. "I.
~....~
t' .. ./
/. t t,'/ /.~
"'- ' ;' - /
,--- /,,-,./
-_ "I
",:::" /
-, ~
)
., .'
/
(/, '--
#.
/ -
-' "1
~ " (
/-, / !
-~"',.
-
.
...._ ...,,--'1
"'-----:'
--~!
"
~
;--,
,')
~:'? _~~-k.~;2
=5 _7 L~ _.::~
,/ / C'
'I
.I
"-,------,--------~--_._.""_.._._~_.._. -
(jeT i 4 1991
,--r,
j
October 13, 1997
..-,~=:r-="~""-'" '-. ,.... """,.....~.."- .,.~
~-......",.....,,,...<:..-,_..~........,,,....,,,........... .."
Mr. Jay McCoy
Infrastructure Division Manager
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Inhoff Place
Martinez, CA. 94553
Dear Hr. McCoy:
We want to from a Contractual Assessment District for
Charles Hill Circle in Orinda. After two information meetings
in the last few months, we believe there is enough interest amoung
our neighbors to meet the requirements of a "C.A.D".
Our reasons for wanting to join the C.A.D. are two: (1) our
septic tank is 32 years old and could fail at any time, (2) a C.A.D.
with full support by neighbors could be financially feasible if
formed now.
We therefore ask that the Central San Board approve our requist
at the earliest possible date.
Sincerely,
I~~W~
I /, - !
c- i-I
- (4// J ( t~\:'~:-)})C{'-C/-,.
. Jean E. S mi t h
Robert H. Dailey, MD, FACEP
, .i ,~.I-. 'If "@lfllU"r2 -fJ~~".
. . :J I ;~._""'~_,,_ 'J ~ n I
;' '. --";';;'1 [II'
!in;' JilL
"j,' OCT' 5ww 'ii'l
'C. "- f:'r.'f" I ,.I i '
. I h../
._.~.._ I
'....( ;~'.I:-:'-'.~: ~-~ ,.......,.>.".-.~
.' , '., tll'.~ I Rucrup;.'
"~"'~..""_~_'_~.'_~' ...__~ . 1._.
29 Charles Bill Circle
Orinda, Ca, 94563
phone: 510-253-8275
FAX: 510-253-8373
10/12/97
Mr. Jay McCoy
Infrast.ruct.ure Di v. Manager
Cent.ral CC Sani t.ary Dist.rict.
5019 Inhoff Place
Marinez, CA, 94553
Dear Mr McCoy,
I am wr i t.ing to ask you t.o form a Cont.ractual
Assessment. Dist.rict. for our area of Charles Bill Circle in
Orinda. I think our family and neighbors can meet. t.he
requirement.s for a CAD.
We are all on old septic t.anks which are nearing t.he
end of t.heir life-span, and so we are anxious t.o get. on
ci t.y sewage.
Sin~e.,relY "l
v vlf1/,
Robert. a. Dailey, MD
,,~,~()a~
Cat.herine M Dailey, RN
James M. Taylor
28 AJta VIsta
Olinda. CA 94563
Home Phone (510)254-8587
, , 1- -::'r,,;-lf"G -Wrm--r~\:\
" - .., -'-'-~---r I ill
'1\( OCT Il_~j~J
r".LL
' - ----
!~CCSD INFRASTRUCTURE
October 15, 1997
Mr, Jay McCoy
Infrastructure Div. Manager
Central CC Sanitary District
5019 InhotIPlace
Martinez, CA 94553
Dear Mr. McCoy,
We own the property located at 27 Charles Hill Circle in Olinda. I am writing to ask you to fonn a Contractual
Assessment District for our area of Charles Hill Circle in Orinda. I believe that our family and neighbors can meet the
requirements for a CAD.
We are all on old septic tanks which are near the end of their life span, and would like to attach to the city sewage
system.
Sincerely,
~
Gayle R. Taylor
1 Hart f ont Road
Onnda# CA 94563
(510-254-5276]
t !;"\'-f~'-G~; '7;;-"(-',: .
1 ~D.I r. ~'-, "2.~L_. ,1 ._~:' .
;. .? (
I ~l: NOV - 6 1997
I L . . -- .___.~
l::_~CSD INFRASTRUCTU0.(
November 1, 1997
Mr. Jay McCoy
Infrestructure Division Manager
Centre I Contre Costa Sanitary District
5019 Imhoff Place
Martlnez# CA 94553
Re: Establ1shment of a Contractual Assessment O1strict for the purpose of a publlc main extension
of a sewer line on Charles Hill Circle ln Orinda
Dear Si r:
Reluctantly, I would be in agreement 1n establ1shing a Contractual Assessment O1strict for the
purpose of a public maln extension of a sewer line on Charles Hill Circle in Orinda with the
provision of at least 10 property owners involved sharing the construction expense.
3 of many problems from my point of view are:
1) It would be twice as expensive to pay the yearly sewer fee for each household on the taxpayer's
bUI than to properly maintain the present septic tank-drain field systems.
21 Monte Vista subdivision was laid out to accommodate septic tank-drain field systems instead of
the proposed location of a public sewer Hne along Charles Hill Circle. The sewer Hne should be in
the canyon along the easements already prepared [1-05-79J instead of on Charles Hnl Circle where
pumps would be required in some cases.
3] Installation of a new pUblic sewer line in the proposed location would open the area to more
development on now vacant property. This would put a burden on an already ageing and inadequate
water supply and delivery system in the area- a problem that merits priority attenUon.
Sincerely, . /)
f K'
- " ' >1 . . 0 0
'fjlC7~ "1. . .
Marjorie M. Cook
Resident of 41 years at this address
G. Larry Engel
31 Charles Circle
Orinda, California 94563
Telephone: 510-254-8305
i: . \1"\~"'lliW"~i
......._., ij I
NOV -7_ J
"J"i~J,F-HhSTRUCTURE
....---.....
November 6, 1997
Mr. Jay McCoy
Infrastructure Division Manager
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
5019 Inhoff Place
Martinez, CA 94553
Dear Mr. McCoy:
I reside at 31 Charles Hill Circle in Orinda. I wish to participate in the
Contractual Assessment District for Charles Hill Circle in Orinda. My reasons include the
superiority of a sewer over a septic system, and the fact that my septic system may
eventually need to be rejuvenated.
I attended the initial meeting at Pierce McKee's office, and I understand what
is involved in the C.A.D. process. Please proceed as requested by Pierce McKee and my
other neighbors.
Thank you.
veyournl
G.:tf
SPRUE 1 \GLE\5021659 _ 01
11/5/97
---,--"..-"-_.__._~,._-"-~-".~..__._._--"--_.._.."-_.._-----_._"-_.~._~._---_._,------_._"~
~
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
.... ........ .... . . . .
.:::::111111111:::1:1_1:111111:.111.1: BOARD MEET~~~; 2, 1998
Page 1 of 6
NO.
6. ENGINEER d.
DATE
TYPE DF ACTION
June 26, 1998
AUTHORIZE CHANGE ORDER AND APPROVE
REQUEST FOR SUBSTITUTION OF
SUBCONTRACTOR
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TO EXECUTE A CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER ON THE SOUTH ORINDA SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, (DP
4928); AND APPROVE SUBSTITUTION OF SUBCONTRACTOR NOT LISTED IN THE ORIGINAL BID
SUBMITTED BY
Charles A. Canepa, Assistant Engineer
INITIATING DEPTIDIV
Engineering Dept./Capital Projects Div.
ISSUES: Authorization by the Board of Directors is required for the General Manager-Chief Engineer to
execute a construction contract change order in an amount greater than $50,000. Authorization by
the Board is also required for the General Manager-Chief Engineer to consent to the substitution of
WESTCON, INC. as a subcontractor for the completion of certain tunneling work which was not listed
by the prime contractor in the original bid.
BACKGROUND: The South Orinda Sewer Improvements Project includes installation of 8,250 feet of
36-inch sewer by microtunneling along Moraga Way. In May of 1998, various problems developed
due to differing site conditions resulting in increased costs and delays to the Contractor's work at two
different sites. A brief chronology for each site follows:
On May 6, 1998, while tunneling from the bore pit at Payless parking lot (TB1) to the receiving pit
across from the Wells Fargo Bank on Moraga Way (TR2), the microtunneling bore machine (MTBM)
encountered an obstruction rendering the machine inoperable. Various attempts by the Contractor to
re-engage the microtunneling operation failed. The MTBM was located under the North bound lane of
Camino Pablo approximately 180 feet into the 512 foot bore and 22 feet below the surface (see
attachment A - AREA 1). The Contractor excavated down to the MTBM to investigate and uncovered
several large boulders obstructing the pathway of the MTBM. It is believed that the boulders are part
of an old creek bed. The Contractor removed the boulders and the cutting face from the MTBM. The
cutting face lost several cutting teeth and the face had to be repaired.
On May 11, 1998, the Contractor reattached the cutting face and successfully restarted the
microtunneling operation. The Contractor completed the bore to TR2 without any further complications.
tc
CAC
~
WB
INITIATING DEPARTMENTIDIVISION
HT
DATE
June 26, 1998
Page 2 of 6
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TO EXECUTE A CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER ON THE SOUTH ORINDA SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, (DP
4928); AND APPROVE SUBSTITUTION OF SUBCONTRACTOR NOT LISTED IN THE ORIGINAL BID
On May 21, 1998, while microtunneling from the bore pit at Payless parking lot (TB 1) to the receiving
pit next to the Orinda Crossroads Pumping Station (TR 1), the tunneling machine encountered metal
wire and cobble stones approximately 190 feet into the 314 foot bore and approximately 15 feet
below the ground surface. Several broken cutting teeth from the MTBM and some unidentifiable steel
wires were discovered in the tunneling slurry discharge.
The next day, the MTBM became clogged causing the Contractor to lose all ability to control the
machine. The MTBM was located approximately 90 feet from the pumping station underneath the
City of Orinda's "mini park" at the intersection of Brookwood Drive and Camino Pablo (see
attachment A - AREA 2). Due to the sensitivity of the area, the idea of retrieving the MTBM by open
cut excavation was Quickly abandoned. The Contractor and the District staff decided to retrieve the
MTBM by hand tunneling back from the pumping station. The operation entailed pushing a 60-inch
diameter steel casing from the TR1 to the MTBM. In order to advance the casing, the soil was hand
excavated and removed from the face of the 60-inch casing.
From May 26 through June 6, 1998, the hand tunneling operation continued 24 hours a day except
on Sunday. During the hand tunneling operation inside the casing, it was discovered that an
abandoned 15-inch reinforced concrete pipe and three concrete encased wire tie-backs of an
abandoned electrical tower were in the path of the microtunneling alignment and had to be removed.
The failure of the MTBM was due to the first concrete footing.
On June 6, 1998, the Contractor reached the MTBM. On June 10, 1998, the Contractor removed
the damaged MTBM and constructed the remaining 90 feet of the 36-inch pipeline inside the steel
casing. The void between the pipe and steel casing was filled with grout. The damaged MTBM was
immediately trucked to Minnesota for repair. The manufacturer estimated, based on the reported
damage, that the microtunneling machine would not be repaired and returned to the site until July 13.
This delay would advance the schedules further into another wet weather and holiday season and
would conflict with the City of Orinda's project at Glorietta Boulevard which will begin by July 30,
1998.
The Contractor requested substitution of a new contractor, WESTCON, INC., which was not listed
in the original bid. The additional microtunneling subcontractor, WESTCON, INC., is presently
mobilizing at the job site. The original microtunneling subcontractor, Nada Pacific, Inc., has been
notified of the request for a substitution of subcontractor for a discrete portion of the tunneling
operation and the reasons for the request. Nada Pacific has no objections to this substitution.
DATE
June 26, 1998
Page 3 of 6
SUBJECT
AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TO EXECUTE A CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER ON THE SOUTH ORINDA SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, (DP
4928); AND APPROVE SUBSTITUTION OF SUBCONTRACTOR NOT LISTED IN THE ORIGINAL BID
The problems at AREA 1 and AREA 2 were both unknown to the Contractor and are within the
stipulations specified under Contract Specifications General Conditions, GC-11, Differing Site
Conditions. The Contractor has requested additional compensation for the extra work, the repair of
the MTBM, the addition of another microtunneling subcontractor, and impacts to the contract work.
Records of all extra work were kept on a time and material basis. The total cost for this negotiated
change order is approximate and not to exceed $450,000. An exact figure cannot be known until
the damaged microtunneling machine is repaired.
Problems such as this are not uncommon on complex tunneling projects. District staff will continue
to require project quality control, enforce traffic control and hours of work, provide for public safety
and safety awareness, and maintain public relations with the residents and businesses of Orinda, the
City of Orinda and other public agencies.
RECOMMENDA nON: 1) Authorize the General Manager-Chief Engineer to execute a contract
change order with Mountain Cascade Inc. for the extra costs associated with differing site conditions
not to exceed $450,000 allocated from the project contingency; and 2) authorize the General
Manager-Chief Engineer to approve substitution of WESTCON, INC., for microtunneling operations on
the South Orinda Sewer Improvements Project, DP 4928.
c:
'"
..,
N
o
.c
u
2
"0
:;:;
'"
E
.c
u
2
"0
"
00
N
en
....
"
..,
~
o
"
VI
>-
VI
"8
"
- ." Central Contra Costa
6 Sanitary District
~
00
en
!!!
g~
o '
U...-,
Q.N
,-
SOUTHWOOD DR
AREA
TR1
.~
~
1~
o
~~--
200
I
FEET
PORTION LINE "A", CAMINO PABLO
SOUTH ORINDA
SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
ATTACHMENT
A
-~--~---_..., -,._--_."._-------------_.,_._._-_._._-~--,--~--~---
Page 5 of 6
RESOLUTION NO. 98-
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE
GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER
TO EXECUTE A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
AND AUTHORIZE THE APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OF CONTRACTOR
ON THE SOUTH ORINDA SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (DP 4928)
WHEREAS the District and Mountain Cascade, Incorporated, (Contractor) have
entered into a contract for the South Orinda Sewer Improvement Project (DP 4928) which
is presently underway; and
WHEREAS differing site conditions have been encountered on several occasions
resulting in increased costs and significant delays; and
WHEREAS the differing site conditions which were not known to the Contractor,
are within the stipulations specified under the contract General Conditions No. 11 and
have increased the Contractor's costs significantly; and
WHEREAS the microtunneling equipment utilized by the Contractor's subcontractor
has been damaged and rendered inoperable for a significant period of time thereby causing
the risk of further delay to the construction project schedule; and
WHEREAS the equipment needed to proceed with the microtunneling work is now
available from Westcon, Inc., a subcontractor not listed by the Contractor in its original
bid; and
WHEREAS the Contractor has requested adding or a substitution of Westcon, Inc.
for the purpose of completing a portion of the microtunneling operations until the damaged
equipment is repaired and returned to the site; and
WHEREAS the listed subcontractor has been notified pursuant to Public Contract
Code Sec. 4107(a)(7) of the Contractor's substitution or addition request and reasons
therefore; and
WHEREAS the substitution/addition of subcontractor and change order is a matter
of necessity due to the impact of the changed site conditions, damage to the existing
subcontractor's microtunneling equipment, and the multiple risks of further schedule
delays, including adverse impacts on traffic congestion, community relations and total
project costs.
THEREFORE the Board of Directors of Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
resolves:
1 . The Board authorizes the General Manager-Chief Engineer to execute a contract
change order for the South Orinda Sewer Improvement Project (DP 4928) in an
amount not to exceed $450,000, with Mountain Cascade, Inc. from the project
----~--_.~~-'-~----"_._---"..._----"~-_._<------"._-------_._._--~-------,---_._-"._--_._-----._--_....~-.-,.._.,-"-_.,_.~. .~.,,~.._--.,--,_._._-_._-"--_.,-"
Page 6 of 6
construction contingency fund for extra costs associated with the differing site
conditions and resulting damage to microtunneling equipment.
2. The Board authorizes the General Manager-Chief Engineer to approve Mountain
Cascade's request for the substitution/addition of Westcon, Inc. as a subcontractor
for a portion of the microtunneling operations originally assigned to Nada Pacific on
the South Orinda Sewer Improvement Project (DP 4928).
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of July 2, 1998, by the Board of Directors of the
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District by the following votes:
AYES:
Members:
NOES:
Members:
ABSENT:
Members:
James A. Nejedly
President of the Board of Directors
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District,
County of Contra Costa, State of California
COUNTERSIGNED:
Joyce E. Murphy
Secretary, Central Contra Costa
Sanitary District, County of Contra Costa
State of California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Kenton L. Aim
District Counsel