HomeMy WebLinkAboutBOARD MINUTES 04-20-61
70
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE DISTRICT BOARD
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DJSTRICT
HELD APRIL 20, 1961
The District Board of Central Contra Costa Sanitary District convened in
an Adjourned Regular Session at its regular place of meeting located at 1250
Springbrook Road, Walnut Creek, County of Contra Costa, State of California,
on April 20,1961, at 8:00 o'clock P.M.
The meeting was called to order by President Mitchell.
10.- -,
I. ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Members:
Gibbs, Roemer, Salfingere, Bowman and Mitchell
ABSENT :
Members:
None
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTF.S
The Minutes of the meeting of April 13, 1961, were approved as presented.
III.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
None.
IV.
HEAR ING8
None.
V.
OLD BUSINESS
RIGHTS OF WAY FOR A PORTION OF LINE G
Mr. Horstkotte, District Manager-Engineer, stated that, regardless of
when the work for Line G was to be done, the District should acquire the rights
of way for the first mile or so to get beyond any conflict with the State
freeway proposed for the area.
~
President Mitchell suggested that rights of way only for the freeway
crossings be acquired.
Mr. Horstkotte explained, with drawings on the blackboard, why continuous
easements should be acquired. He estimated the cost to be approximately
$5,000.00.
Member Gibbs questioned Mr. Williams, representing Mr. Bohn, Counsel for
the District, regarding the legality of acquiring rights of way outside the
District.
Mr. Williams stated that this did not present a problem.
After discussion, it was moved by Member Bowman, seconded by Member
Roemer, that $5,000.00 from Sewer Construction General Funds be authorized
to acquire the necessary rights of way, approximately one mile in length,
for Line G, to extend beyond that portion of the State freeway proposed for
the area. Carried by the following vote:
AYES: Members: Gibbs, Roemer, Salfingere, Bowman and Mitchell
NOES: Members: None
ABSENT: Members: None
""-'
SWDGE CONTRACT
President Mitchell asked that letters from the following parties interested
in a contract for the sludge at the Treatment Plant be read:
04
20
61
Bert C. Noland
Norman Brown
J. A. Hallett
J. W. O'Neal
71
Mr. Horstkotte, District Manager-Engineer, recommended that the present
contract with Mr. Noland be extended, stating that the service to the
District and the cooperation of Mr. Noland have outweighed the income to the
District from the sale of the sludge.
President Mitchell stated that, although the District can legally con-
tinue the present contract, it being a public body the èontract should be
considered on a bid basis.
~
Member Gibbs stated that the service to the District from the contractor
could be worth a lot more than the funds recovered from the sludge.
, J
Member Roemer stated that the sludge contract relieves the District of a
lot of work. He also stated that parties prepared to bid would be upset if
not allowed to bid.
Mr. Horstkotte stated that the District has worked with the present con-
tractor for three years and it has been most satisfactory to the District.
Member Bowman stated that bids should be submitted with the District
setting forth the conditions and spelling out what the District requires for
the removal of the sludge.
Member Roemer moved that the present contract be continued for a period
of one year with the contractor having the option for another two years. The
Motion failed for lack of a second.
President Mitchell suggested receiving bids with conditions for removal
set forth by the District and evaluate the present service to the District at
tba t time.
Member Bowman stated he would feel better about making a decision to
continue with the present contractor after the receipt of bids.
Mr. O'Neal and Mr. Noland were in the audience and were heard.
~
RESODJTION NO. 127l~ AUTHORIZING THE DISTRICT STAFF 1'0 ASK NORlWl BR.OiIN,
BERT C . NOUND J. A. HALlETT AND J. II. ~ FOR THE
REMOVAL OF S* AT THE -- PUNT IN ACCORDÀO w.L'.L1á ŠPECIFICA-
TIONS TO BE r.s1ÀBIJBIŒD BY 'l'HÊ DISTRICT STAFF
It was moved by Member Roemer, seconded by Member Salfingere, that Resolu-
tion No. 1271 be adopted. Carried bY' the following vote:
ADS: Members: Gibbs, Roemer, Sa1fingere, Bowman and Mitchell
NOES: Members: None
ABSENT: Members : None
EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT AGREEMENT RELATIVE TO SACRAMENTO NORTHERN
RAIIJolAY ABANDONED R~HT OF WAY
~
Mr. Horstkotte, District Manager-Engineer, presented a map showing the
Sacramento Northern RailwaY' right of way and explained that the original
est;imate of $5,000.00 for surveying the right of way bY' the East Bay Municipal
Utility District was on the basis that the railroad right of way was well
defined. As it turned out, the center line of the right of way was not
clearly defined. He stated that the original right of way was established in
1912 and, to determine its exact location relative to contiguous properties,
it was necessary to surveY' the adjoining properties to establish the correct
location; this resulted in survey costs higher than originally anticipated.
Mr. Horstkotte reported that, in addition to the survey costs, the
Utility District paid $9,600.00 to Utah Construction Compaqy and $6,000.00
to Mr. Bruzzone for rights of way and have litigation pending with Mr. Bonar
for a right of way for which he is asking $50,000.00 and which the East Bay
Municipal Utility District bas had appraised for $18,000.00.
The District has purchased, in fee with certain right of way reservations,
approximately 3.5 acres from Oliveira for $18,299.00.
Mr. Horstkotte stated that the East BaY' Municipal Utility District pro-
posal was for the District to pay one-half the survey cost, in the amount of
$10,635.84, and to deed to the Utility District thirty feet of the sixty-foot
04
20
61
72
strip, acquired from the Oliveira's, without cost to the Utility District.
The Utility District to deed to the Sanitary District the necessary easements
for existing lines in the area of the properties acquired from Bonar, Bruzzone,
Utah Construction Company and Sacramento Northern Railway. The Agreement be-
tween the East Bay Municipal Utility District and the Sanitary District dated
September 18,1958, to be cancelled.
Mr. Horstkotte recommended that the terms worked out with the East Bay
Municipal Utility District be accepted and the 1958 Agreement cancelled. He
stated that there are terms in the Agreement, that if not cancelled, could be
costly to the Sanitary District.
=~W~i°:U~ë~~~T~~~~I~~ u:~~~, ~=C~
THIRTY FEET OF THJ!j SIXTY-FOOT PARCEL PURCHASED FROM THE OLIVEIRA'S PAY
~.tl4 SUHVI!iI COST, AND OBTAIN FROM THE EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTItI!r
DI.:5TRICT EASEMENl'S FOR EXISTING LINES IN THE PROPERTY ACQU lHI!t.U FROM BONM,
BRUZZONE, UTAH CONSTRUCTION COMP/ANY AND SACRAMEm'O NORTHERN RAIIWAY
It was moved by Member Roemer, seconded by Member Bowman, that Resolution
No. 1272 be adopted. Carried by the following vote:
----
AYES: Members: Gibbs, Roemer, Salfingere, Bowman and Mitchell
NOES: Members: None
ABSENT: Members: None
VI. NDi BUSINESS
It was moved by Member Roemer, seconded by Member Bowman, that Resolution
No. 1273 be adopted. Carried by the following vote:
AYES: Members: Gibbs, Roemer, Salfingere, Bowman and Mitchell
NOES: Members: None
ABSENT: Members: None
'--"
AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF WALNUT CREEK FOR S8ERING WATERSHED 27 (YGNACIO
V ALIEI )
The Agreement between the City of Walnut Creek and the Sanitary District
for sewering Watershed 27 (Ygnacio Valley) signed by the City officials was
presented to the District Board.
The letter of tl'ansmitta1 from the City referred to two changes in the
original Agreement that were made.
Paragraph VIII, providing for written approval by the City of Walnut
Creek for any connections to the sewer while they had a financial interest,
was not acceptable to Members of the Board.
It was moved by Member Gibbs, seconded by Member Bowman, that the Agreement
between the City of Walnut Creek and the Sanitary District for sewering Watershed
27 (Ygnacio Valley) was satisfactory with the elimination of Paragraph VIII.
Carried by the following vote:
AYFS: Members: Gibbs, Roemer, Salfingere, Bowman and Hi tche1l
NOES: Members: None
ABSENT: Members: None
Members of the District Board agreed that, if the Agreement between the
City of Walnut Creek and the District was not in satisfactory form for signing
by the District, the bids for Watershed 27 called for at 9:00 o'clock P.M. on
May 4, 1961, would not be opened. .
'-"'
ANNUAL AUDIT
It was moved by Member Gibbs, seconded by Member Bowman, that Mr. Eldo
Ewert be retained for the annual audit on the previous basis of $650.00.
Carried by the following vote:
04
20
61'
73
AYES: Members: Gibbs, Roemer, Salfingere, Bowman and Mitchell
NOm: Members: None
ABSENT: Members: None
ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENTS
It was moved by Member Bowman, seconded by Member Gibbs, that the ease-
ment from the Benevolent and Protecti va Order of Elks be accepted and its
recording ordered. Carried by the following vote:
~
AYES : Members: Gibbs, Roemer, Salfingere, Bowman and Hi tchell
NOES: Members: None
ABSENT: Membe rs : None
DISTRICT OFFICE AND CORPORATION YARD SITE IMPROVEMENTS
Mr. Horstkotte, District Manager-Engineer, presented a plan showing the
proposed plan to improve the three excess parcels acquired .from the State .and
itemized the improvements to be made and requested $11,200.00 from Sewer Con-
struction General Funds to proceed with the improvements.
After discussion, it was moved by Member Bowman, seconded by Member
Roemer, that $11,200.00 be authorized .from Sewer CoIl8truction General Funds
to improve the three excess parcels acquired .from the State as detailed by
Mr. Horstkotte. Carried by the .following vote:
AYES: Members: Gibbs, Roemer, Salfingere, Bowman. and Hi tchell
NOJ!'S : Members: Nane
ABSENT: Members: None
ANNEXATION TERMS FOR 10.76 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED BAR PIEASANT HILL ROAD AND
PASO NOG1L
~
It was moved by Member Bowman, seconded by Member Roemer, that terms for
annexing the 10.76 acres located near Pleasant Hill Road and Paso Nagal, under
Ordinance 24, be $250.00 per acre Watershed 24 charge, $191.00 per acre
annexation fee, plus the cost of processing. Carried by the following vote:
. ¡
AYES : Members:
NOES: Members:
ABSENT: Members :
Gibbs, Roemer, Salfingere, Bowman and Hi tchell
None
None
VII. REPORTS
D !STRICT MANAGER-ENG IHEER
AUTHORIZATION FOR EIECTRIC. HOIST AT THE TREATMENT PLANT
Mr. Horstkotte, District Manager-Engineer, presented a memorandum and
pictures from Mr. David NUes, Supervising Sewage .Treatment Plant Operator,
showing and explaining the hazards in handling the tanks of chlorine at the
Treatment Plant and requesting that an eleòtric hoist be installed at a cost
of $1,350.00 to eliminate as much as possible the hazards in handling of the
chlorine tanks.
~
It was moved by Member Saltingere, seconded by Member Bowman, that
$1,350.00 .from Sewer Construction General Funds be authorized to install an
electric hoist at the Treatment Plant to eliminate as much as possible the
hazards in handling the chlorine tanks at the Treatment Plant. Carried by
the following vote:
AYES: Members: Gibbs, Roemer, Saltingere, Bowman and Hi tchell
NOES : Members: None
ABSENT: Members: None
At the suggestion of Member Bowman, the Secretary was instructed to
write a letter to Mr. Niles, commending him on his presentation and solution
to the hazardous problem of handling the chlorine tanks at the Treatment Plant.
MANPOWER REQUIREMENTS FOR 1961-1962
Mr. Horstkotte stated that the manpower requirements for the coming year
were ready and the infomation would be sent to each Member o.f the Board.
04
20
61'
.74
CmMMElIDAmON FOR MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT
Mr. Horstkotte coJlDlended the Maintenance Department for the work accom-
plished in March and read the detailed report for the month.
MICROFILMING DISTRICT RECORDS
Mr. Horstkotte stated that after investigation of microfilming District
records it was found to be too costly and it was determined to make duplicate
tracings for storage at the Treatment Plant.
COUNSEL FOR THE DISTRICT
None.
~
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
At 10:15 o'clock P.M., the meeting was adjourned by President Mitchell
to May 4,1961.
~
Pres e 0 e strict Board of the
Central Contra Costa Sani~ District of
Contra Costa County State of California
COUNTERSIGNED:
~~ of. the
Central ntra Costa Ssni tary District of
Contra Costa County State of California
~
~
04
20
61
-.-.