HomeMy WebLinkAboutBOARD MINUTES 12-05-74
477
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE DISTRICT BOARD
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
DECEMBER 5,1974
The District Board of Central Contra Costa Sanitary District convened
in a Regular Session at its regular place of meeting located at 1250
Springbrook Road, Walnut Creek, County of Contra Costa, State of
California, on December 5,1974, at 8:00 o'clock P.M.
The meeting was called to order by President Boneysteele.
1.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
Members:
Gibbs, Mitchell, Rustigian, Allan and Boneysteele
ABSENT:
Members:
None
II.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
After comment by President Boneysteele, it was moved by Member
Mitchell, seconded by Member Allan, that the Minutes of the meeting of
November 21,1974, be approved after the following correction:
On page 7 under "Items of Old Business - Dates for Consideration"
add the following:
"6. Staff report on population equivalents for District Trunks
December 26,1974."
Motion correcting the Minutes of the meeting of November 21,1974,
carried by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Members:
Members:
Members:
Gibbs, Mitchell, Rustigian, Allan and Boneysteele
None
None
III.
APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES
At the request of Member Mitchell, President Boneystee1e deferred the
matter of approval of Expenditures until after New Business Item 7, "Authorize
General Manager-Chief Engineer to File Notice of Completion, DSP 2121,
Moraga," was first considered by the Board.
After discussion regarding Item 7 and Sewer Construction Fund Vouchers
No. 2285 and 2293 which represented progress payments to the District's
contractor for DSP 2121, it was moved by Member Rustigian, Chairman of the
Expenditure Committee, seconded by Member Gibbs, that after review, that
expenditures, specifically, Sewer Construction Vouchers Numbers 2283 to 2308
inclusive, Running Expense Vouchers Numbers 19302 to 19458 inclusive,
Local Improvement District Vouchers Nos. land 2 inclusive, and Payroll
Vouchers Numbers 509 to 633 inclusive, be approved. Carried by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Members:
Member:
Members:
Gibbs, Rustigian, Allan and Boneysteele
Mitchell
None
IV.
HEARINGS
None.
V.
BIDS
None.
12
05
74
478
IV.
OLD BUSINESS
1.
PROPOSED DRAFT ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11) DISTRICT CODE
(ANNEXATION AND FIXTURE CHARGES)
ORDINANCE NO. 102, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 11-203 OF THE DISTRICT
CODE
Mr. Dalton, Deputy General Manager-Chief Engineer, presented Board
Members with a memorandum dated December 4,1974 (Subject: Fixture Charge
Adjustment) and memorandum dated November 27,1974 (Subject: Financial
Planning - Revision of Revenue Bases), which reflect staff rationale,
analyses and recommendations for increasing current District annexation
and fixture charges. Discussion followed wherein Board Members queried
staff and discussed various aspects of staff '-s analyses to include line
sizes, plant capacity, population projections, cash flow requirements and
consideration of inflationary costs based upon projection of the San
Francisco regional Engineering News Record Cost Index for construction.
Mr. Dean LaField, Associated Building Industry of Northern California
presented the following statement to the Board.
"STATEMENT
TO THE
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ON THE
PROPOSED INCREASE IN ANNEXATION AND FIXTURE
December 5,1974
CHARGES
Mr. President, Members of the Board, for the record my name is Dean LaField,
representing the Associated Building Industry of Northern California.
Our Association formed a special committee to review the District's "Plan-
ning and Financing Study - 1974" and to consider the proposed increase in
annexation and fixture charges which is before you now.
We want to acknowledge our appreciation of the fact that Mr. Horstkotte
and Mr. Dalton took time to meet with our committee to explain the report
and answer our questions about it and the proposed increases.
With respect to the substantial increases proposed, we have earlier advised
you that among our concerns would be those of equity and the impact on the
cost of needed shelter and other necessary construction to serve people's
needs.
We have also advised you before that we were concerned with comments heard
during past discussions by your Board along such lines as maybe wanting
to discourage growth and setting fees at a level to accomplish such an
end. (Those comments have been conveyed to our committee.)
Following our discussion of the proposed increases, we have concluded that
our position on any increase in annexation fees and fixture charges is not
one of approval - but only a conditional and qualified acceptance.
Our conditions and qualifications follow:
1.
That the District proceed expeditiously to implement the Environmental
Quality Charge.
2.
That the District consider all available financing and cash flow
alternatives) including bonds and borrowing.
3.
That the District reaffirm its already existing strong commitment
to serve its ultimate service area. That commitment dates from the
1956 Master Plan, and you have "pre-empted the field."
4.
That the District offer assurance that its apparent intended course of
"coordinating its activities and planning with other utilities and
local government units" does not mean undertaking or assuming planning
responsibilities for such local governmental agencies - nor attempting
to influence such decisions.
12
05
74
479
5.
That if annexation and fixture charges are increased, the District's
policies provide for adequate notice of such increases and that the
effective time of application of any increased charges be clearly
defined. (We will be pleased to work with your staff in this respect
so that we have a clear understanding of the policies.)
Mr. President, Members of the Board, our industry - through such fees and
charges as are being discussed - has been and will continue to be a major
contributor to, and financial supporter of, your District.
We quite properly feel - particularly in view of the ma~ft~~~ðe of this fee
increase - that we who will have to pay are entitled to all of the con-
siderations specified by us, and, most importantly, to assurance that the
District intends to meet the sewer service needs of its present and committed,
logical, ultimate service area. That is a major task, and you and your capable
staff should not be diverted from that responsibility. It is, after all,
the reason for your existence.
Our committee, which has reviewed the report and the charge proposal, will
continue to function as the "Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Review
Committee." It will monitor your District's activities, and also is willing
and available to serve as a resource to your Board and the District staff on
all matters affecting our industry.
President Boneysteele, I have been asked to convey personally to you an
invitation from the committee for you to meet with them. This would present
an opportunity to get acquainted and to share in discussion of District
matters. We will be in contact with you soon after the first of the new
year to confirm a mutually agreeable time.
Thank you.
DPLF:g"
Discussion followed regarding the statement by Mr. LaField. President
Boneysteele stated that his responsibility was to represent his constitutents
and that he did not consider the District's ultimate service area as defined
in Brown and Caldwell's 1956 Study as a "commitment" that he must support,
especially since he had been elected to the Board in 1967. Each matter on
annexation must be considered on its own merits. Member Mitchell stated
that he also did not consider the ultimate service area as defined in the
1956 study a "commitment" and he had been a Member of the Board at the
time of that Study. In response to comment by Mr. LaField that the District's
existence is predicated upon providing sewer service for its ultimate
service area, Member Mitchell stated that other limiting factors must be
considered such as financial capabilities and treatment plant and sewer line
capacities. He indicated that knowledge of the District's limitations
and capabilities to provide sewer service should be available to other
governmental agencies to assist in their planning decisions.
Board Members and staff then discussed the cash flow requirements of
the District in relationship to the projected ENR cost index, inflation and
current construction project commitments of the District. During the
discussion, Member Gibbs stated that the objective is to assure that property
owners that decide to annex to the District will pay the total cost for
whatever sewage facilities that are necessary to service them. Current
taxpayers of the District should not have to contribute to the cost for
these new facilities.
Mr. Bohn noted that staff had presented alternative methods for the
determination of annexation charges for consideration by the Board. One method,
based upon accumulated taxes since 1949 and assessed valuation, resulted in
an annexation charge of $950.00 per acre. The alternate method reflected cur-
rent replacement costs for major sewage facilities such as trunklines and
resulted in $789.00 per acre.
After discussion relating to the implementation date for establishment
of an increase in annexation charges as related to previous Board policy,
it was moved by Member Mitchell, seconded by Member Gibbs, that Ordinance
No. 102, An Ordinance Amending Section 11-203 of the District Code by establish-
ing annexation charges in the amount of $800.00 per acre effective April 1,
1975, be adopted and placed in the official files and Ordinances of the District;
and further that said Ordinance shall be published once in the Contra Costa
12
05
74
-------.---.-.----. ..--.. -------.-.----.....-------- ..---------.-..-----------
480
Times, a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in
Central Contra Costa County and shall take effect upon expiration of the
week of publication. CarríBd by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Members:
Members:
Members:
Gibbs) Mitchell and Boneysteele
Rustigian and Allan
None
Members Rustigian and Allan explained that they had cast negative votes
because they consider the effective date for implementation of Ordinance
No. 102 (April 1,1975) is precipitous and does not reflect previous
District policy.
1.
CONSENT ITEMS
a.
VII.
NEW BUSINESS
ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENTS AT NO COST TO THE DISTRICT
It was moved by Member Allan, seconded by Member Rustigian, that
e..as:eroen ts from:
Grantor
Job No.
Parcel No.
La Salle Manor, partnership
Christensen-Criddle, partnership
S. W. Bergren) et ux
F. X. Driscoll, et ux
2536
2379
2436
2547
1
2
1
2
be accepted at no cost to the District and their recording ordered.
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
2.
Members:
Members:
Members:
Carried
Gibbs, Mitchell, Rustigian, Allan and Boneysteele
None
None
CLAIM OF ELWIN E. TARWATER IN THE AMOUNT OF $25.00
It was moved by Member Rustigian) seconded by Member Allan, that the
claim of Elwin E. Tarwater in the amount of $25.00 be paid following receipt
of a signed Release in Full Settlement and Compromise. Carried by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
3.
Members:
Members:
Members:
Gibbs, Mitchell, Rustigian, Allan and Boneysteele
None
None
CLAIM OF RUTH HAWKSWORTH IN THE AMOUNT OF $50.00
It was moved by Member Rustigian, seconded by Member Gibbs, that the
claim of Ruth Hawksworth in the amount of $50.00 be paid following receipt
of a signed Release in Full Settlement and Compromise. Carried by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
4.
Members:
Members:
Members:
Gibbs, Mitchell, Rustigian, Allan and Boneysteele
None
None
CLAIM OF GEORGE L. KOSTA IN THE AMOUNT OF $120.50
It was moved by Member Rustigian, seconded by Member Gibbs, that the
claim of George L. Kosta in the amount of $120.50 be paid following receipt
of a signed Release in Full Settlement and Compromise. Carried by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Members:
Members:
Members:
Gibbs, Mitchell, Rustigian, Allan and Boneysteele
None
None
At 9:28 o'clock P.M., President Boneysteele recessed the meeting.
At 9:35 o'clock P.M., President Boneystee1e reconvened the meeting.
12
05
74
481
AUTHORIZE $12,000.00 FOR INFILATRATION/INFLOW CONTROL CORRECTION
PROJECT, 1974-75
5.
After explanation by staff regarding the scope of the Infiltration/
Inflow Control Correction Project for 1974-75, and discussion of its
technical aspects, it was moved by Member Mitchell, seconded by Member
Allan, that authorization of $12,000.00 for implementation of the Infiltration/
Inflow Control recommendations be approved. Carried by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Members:
Members:
Members:
Gibbs, Mitchell, Rustigian, Allan and Boneysteele
None
None
6.
AUTHORIZE $1,000.00 REIMBURSEMENT TO EBMUD FOR STABILIZATION
ACTIVITY, SAN LEANDRO CREEK, MORAGA
Mr. Hinkson, Manager, Maintenance Department, and Mr. Horstkotte,
General Manager-Chief Engineer, explained that slide erosion in San Leandro
Creek, Moraga, had threatened the District's 24" trunkline and structures
in the area. Stabilization activity to correct the condition had been
conducted by EBMUD. By previous agreement, the District and other agencies
were to participate financially in the project.
After discussion wherein Mr. Bohn, Counsel for the District, stated
that expenditure of funds for this project represented costs to protect
District facilities and did not extend District liability to the corrective
stabilization activity performed by EBMUD to correct the slide erosion. It
was moved by Member Mitchell, seconded by Member Gibbs, that authorization
of $1,000.00 for payment to EBMUD as a cost to protect District facilities,
San Leandro Creek, Moraga, be approved. Carried by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Members:
Members:
Members:
Gibbs, Mitchell, Rustigian, Allan and Boneysteele
None
None
7.
AUTHORIZE GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER TO FILE NOTICE OF COMPLETION,
DSP 2121, MORAGA
Mr. Horstkotte, General Manager-Chief Engineer, reported that DSP 2121,
Line E, Moraga, had been completed. He stated that vitrified clay pipe,
purchased by the District's contractor from Interpace Corporation, South
San Francisco, had been used for the project. After backfill and inspection
of the approximately 1800 foot line, it was determined that several pieces
of the clay pipe had cracks on the top and bottom. Corrective action to seal
the cracks had been taken and the line was by-passed to permit further inspec-
tion in the Spring.
Discussion followed between Board Members and staff. Member Mitchell
stated that this matter should have been previously brought to the attention
of the Board. Mr. Horstkotte explained that he had not considered the matter
as meriting the Board's attention as corrective action had been taken. He
stated that the pipe met the District's specifications and had been inspected
by District personnel. Mr. Horstkotte stated that the District's contractor
(Silva's Pipeline, Inc.) had met District specifications for the project and
therefore was not responsible. Mr. Bohn, Counsel for the District, noted that
in the event the line collapsed, the one year warranty in the contract permitted
recourse to Interpace Corporation. Mr. Horstkotte stated that for additional
protection, a concrete slab had been installed over the deeper section of the
line. Mr. Hinkson, Manager, Maintenance Department, stated that the ability
to by-pass sewage lines, particularly based upon our experience in the Moraga-
St. Marys area, is advantagious to the District. Based upon his experience,
Mr. Hinkson considered the appearance of cracks in clay pipe in this instance
not an uncommon matter.
After the discussion wherein Mr. Bohn stated that formal acceptance of
DSP 2121 by the District initiated the one year warranty period, it was moved
by Member Gibbs, seconded by Member Allan, that the General Manager-Chief
Engineer be authorized to file Notice of Completion for DSP 2121. Carried
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Members:
Member:
Members:
Gibbs, Rustigian, Allan and Boneysteele
Mitchell
None
1 C)
~~
0",,"'
1.--.-
"'~. ii_}
r»-;' k
.' LL
." ..~
482
..
8.
RESOLUTION NO. 74-146, A RESOLUTION APPOINTING WAYNE MASTEN TO
POSITION OF PLANT OPERATOR
Member Allan, Chairman of the Personnel Committee, stated that staff
recommendations had been reviewed and recommended that Mr. Masten be
appointed to the position of Plant Operator.
After discussiont it was moved by Member Allan, seconded by Member
Gibbs, that Resolution No. 74-146 be adopted. Carried by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Members:
Member:
Members:
Gibbst Mitchell, Rustigian, Allan and Boneysteele
None
None
9.
DISCUSSION OF PRIORITY MATTERS RELATED TO DISTRICT PLANNING
Board Members discussed planning matters that should be considered
by the Board at the meeting of December 26,1974.
After discussion with Mr. Horstkotte, General Manager-Chief Engineer,
indicating that Board Members would receive additional data and information
related to "Item a" below, it was the consensus of the Board to schedule
for the December 26t 1974, planning meeting:
a.
b.
Staff report on population equivalents for District trunks.
Pilot program for home separation of solid waste.
Secretary Davis was requested to notify former members of the District's
Citizens Advisory Committee on Solid Waste Recycling.
10.
OTHER BUSINESS ADDED BY SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA
None.
11.
INFORMATION
a. President Boneysteele noted that Board Members had received a
summarization of a presentation made by Mr. Horstkotte, General Manager-
Chief Engineer, to a special section of the Commonwealth Club of California.
Mr. Horstkotte, General Manager-Chief Engineer, stated that Board
Members had been provided with a memorandum prepared by staff concerning
garbage rate analyses with a response by the District's consultant, Mr.
J. S. Plourde. Mr. Horstkotte stated that this matter will be scheduled
for the meeting of December 19,1974.
VIII.
REPORTS
1.
GENERAL MANAGER-CHIEF ENGINEER
a. Mr. Horstkotte reported current activities undertaken by him,
after consultation with President Boneysteele, to repair the District's
outfall line.
After explanation by Mr. Horstkotte regarding engineering procedures
employed to repair the outfall and upon his recommendation, it was moved
by Member Gibbs, seconded by Member Rustigian, that authorization of
$8,000.00 as cost to repair the outfall line be approved. Carried by the
following vote:
AYES: Members:
NOES: Members:
ABSENT: Members:
Gibbs, Mitchell. Rustigian, Allan and Boneysteele
None
None
After comment by Member Mitchell that items of this nature involving
funds should appear on the Agenda, President Boneysteele commented that
as a matter of policy, items that require a vote by Board Members should
be placed on the Agenda. If necessarYt they could be considered under
"Other Business Added by Supplemental Agenda."
12
05
74
483
2.
COUNSEL FOR THE DISTRICT
a. Mr. Bohn reported on negotiations being conducted involving the
District, Industrial Tank Corporation, and the Atchison. Topeka and the
Santa Fe Railroad Company regarding the granting of a private road crossing
over the Santa Fe Railroad tracks at the District's Treatment Plant area.
Mr. Bohn gave a brief description of the contract and the background of
negotiations. He explained that for various reasons, the conditions imposed
by the Santa Fe Company for safeguarding the crossing have escalated
necessitating additional funding by the District. One of the additional
conditions is annual maintenance costs in the amount of $600.00 for railroad
crossing safeguards.
After discussion, it was moved by Member Allan, seconded by Member
Gibbs, that the President and Secretary be authorized to execute an agreement
with the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad for a private road crossing
at the District's Treatment Plant Facility at a total cost of $27,552.00 of
which amount Industrial Tank Corporation is to pay for one half of this cost
and one half of the monthly maintenance cost. Carried by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Members:
Members:
Members:
Gibbs, Mitchell, Rustigian, Allan and Boneysteele
None
None
b. Mr. Bohn reported on current negotiations between staff and repre-
sentatives from Pacific Gas and Electric Company concerning construction
of a pipeline to provide natural gas on an interruptible basis to the
District Treatment Plant Facilities. Mr. Bohn stated that it appeared more
advantageous for the District to construct this pipeline rather than P.G.&E.
Mr. Horstkotte, General Manager-Chief Engineer, stated that unofficial quotes
for construction of such a pipeline ranged from $55,000.00 to $94,000.00.
Mr. Horstkotte noted cost for such pipeline would be eligible for grant funds
and that by issuance of a change order, the District's contractor could
perform the work.
After discussion. it was the consensus of the Board that the General
Manager-Chief Engineer be authorized to issue a change order for construction
of a natural gas pipeline from the District's Treatment Plant Facility, to
a connection point with P.G.&E.ts line facility.
3.
SECRETARY
None.
4.
COMMITTEES
a.
President Boneysteele made the following committee assignments:
Personnel:
Chainnan; Member Allan
Committee Member; Member Gibbs
Expenditures:
Chairman; Member Rustigian
Committee Member; Member Mitchell
Solid Waste:
Chairman; Member Mitchell
Committee Member; Member Rustigian
BASSA:
Member Gibbs
b.
BAY AREA SEWAGE SERVICES AGENCY
Member Gibbs, Trustee BASSA, reported that representatives attending
BASSA's regional meeting on December 11. 1974, would be unable to tour the
District's Treatment Plant Facilities. He stated that Board Members and
staff were cordially invited to attend the no host dinner-meeting.
After discussion wherein President Boneysteele, because of a previous
commitment, requested Member Allan to represent the District at the dinner-
meeting, it was moved by Member Mitchell, seconded by'Member Allan, that
12
05
74
. -------.--------.---- ------- ---------- .---. ---.
484
Board Members, the General Manager-Chief Engineer, the Deputy General
Manager-Chief Engineer, and Managers of the Departments be authorized
to attend the BASSA dinner-meeting on December 11,1974, at the District's
expense. Carried by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Members:
Members:
Members:
Gibbs, Mitchell, Rustigian, Allan and Boneysteele
None
None
c. Board Members discussed the current activities of the Council on
Regional Agencies.
IX.
MATTERS FROM THE FLOOR
1. Board Members acknowledged an invitation to attend the District's
annual Christmas party to be held December 13,1974, in Alamo.
2. President Boneysteele suggested that an additional Board Member
accept the invitation extended to President Boneysteele by Mr. Dean LaField,
Associated Building Industry, Northern California, to meet with a sub-
committee of that organization to discuss topics of mutual interest.
Member Mitchell agreed to accompany President Boneysteele to a meeting
to be scheduled in January, 1975.
3. President Boneysteele reported that Mr. Mark Siemans, State Coopera-
tive Personnel Board, had requested Board policy and guidance concerning
the personnel and salary survey being conducted for the District by Mr.
Siemans. President Boneysteele then explained to the Board Members the
scope of the study as prepared by Mr. Siemans and stated that he had
instructed Mr. Siemans to incorporate within his salary study as a compara-
tive analyses of salaries paid by EBMUD, the Contra Costa County Water
District and Contra Costa County. After consultation with Member Allan,
President Boneysteele stated that he had explained to Mr. Siemans previous
Board policy in regard to employee salaries to be "the going rate plus
a premium." "The amount of the premium to be a matter of judgment of
the Board."
4. President Boneysteele reported on a recent presentation made by
representatives of East Bay Municipal Utility District to a special
section of the Commonwealth Club concerning water reclamation. Discussion
followed.
x.
ADJOURNMENT
At 11:13 o'clock P.M., President Boneysteele adjourned the meeting.
p, '->
~, ./~-:¿
President of the Distri /Board of the
Central Contra Costa S i itary District of
Contra Costa County, State of California
COUNTERSIGNED:
~- k 1o-v~- ~
Secretary of the District Board of the
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District of
Contra Costa County, State of California
12
05
74