Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBOARD MINUTES 06-10-63 1u8 }TINTJ'illS OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR HEETING OF THE DISTRICT BOARD CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT HELD JUNE 10, 1963 The District Board of Central Contra Costa Sanitary District convened in an Adjourned Regular Session at its regular place of meeting located at 1250 Springbrook Road, ~alnut Creek, County of Contra Costa, State of CalifoITlia, on June 10,1963, at 8:00 o'clock P.l:!. The meeting was called to order by President ~fttchell. I. ROLL CALL PRESENT: l1embers : Gibbs, Roemer, Fisher and rntchell ABSENT: Hember: Bowman II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Member Gibbs, seconded by Member Fisher, that the Minutes of the meeting of June 6, 1963, be anproved subject to correcting "Assessment No. 42-15-1, Halter Havisidell to read as follows: "Hr. Horstkotte read a letter from Hr. Haviside and a letter from the County Planning Commission. lI}fr. Horstkotte stated that, upon review, the District staff recommended a reduction in the number of building sites from nine to seven with the units of assessment remaining the same, at five and one-half. IIIt was moved by Hember Gibbs, seconded by Member Fisher, that the protest of Walter Haviside, Assessment No. 42-15-1, be denied and that the staff recom- mendation to reduce the number of building sites from nine to seven with the units of assessment remaining at five and one-half be approved. Carried by the following vote: "AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Hembers: Members: Bember: Gibbs, RoeIœr, Fisher and Hi tchel1 None Bowman" Notion correcting Minutes carried by the following vote: AYES: Hembers: Gibbs, Roemer, Fisher and Mitchell NOES: Hembers: None ABSENT: Member: Bowman III. APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES None. IV. HEARINGS LOCAL DPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 42, CONTINUED President Hitche11 continued the Local Improvement District No. 42 Hearing for the final determination of the several assessment matters carried over from the June 6,1963, meeting. Assessment No. 42-13-4, William D. Lewis President Mitchell stated that he had reviewed the William D. Lewis, Assessment No. 42-13-4, site ~~th Mr. Lewis. Members Roemer and Fisher also stated that they had reviewed the site with Hr. Lewis. Mr. Maurice Marcus, attorney for Mr. Lewis, protested strongly the four building sites, stating that it would not be economically feasible or practical to subdivide. He also stated that the assessment map indicated 3.9 acres ~men there actually were 3.2 acres. Mr. Harcus also stated the location of the home would cause problems, if subdivided. 06 10 63 -1 , J'n . ¡1 Mr. Horstkotte, Engineer for the work, stated that 3.2 ~Tas the correct acreage and not 3.9 and that the cost of subdividing had been considered and four sites were practical. President Mitchell stated that four sites were used as a guide to deter- mining the benefit to the property and he felt it was a fair assessment, a conclusion he arrived at and expressed now for the first time. Member Fisher stated that he felt it was very feasible to develop four lots from an engineering standpoint. After discussion, each Member who visited the site stated that no determination was made at the site. It was moved by Member Fisher, seconded by Member Roemer, that the protest of William D. Lewis, Assessment No. 42-13-4, be denied. Carried by the following vote: A YES: NOES: ABSENT: Nembers: Members: Member: Gibb~, Roemer, Fisher and Mitchell None Bowman Assessment No. 42-11-5, Carl L. Voight President ~ütchell and Members Fisher and Roemer stated that they had each individually gone to the site and reviewed it with Mr. and Mrs. Voight and had made no decision at the site. r~. Horstkotte, Engineer for the work, stated that the staff, u~on review, recommended that the Voight Assessment No. 42-11-5 be reduced from six sites to four and the units of assessment from four and one-half to four. It was moved by Member Roemer, seconded by Member Fisher, that the protest of Carl L. Voight, Assessment No. 42-11-5, be denied and that the staff recom- mendation to reduce the sites from six to four and the units of assessment from four and one-half to four be approved. Carried by the following vote: AYES: NŒS: ABSENT: Members: Gibbs, Roemer, Fisher and Mitchell Members: None Hember: Bowman l~. Horstkotte, Engineer for the work, reported other matters carried over for investigation and decision were determined as follows: Assessment parcels Nos. 42-8-1 and 42-8-2 were combined as 42-8-1, and Assessment No. 42-8-7 was changed to Assessment No. 42-8-2. Assessment No. 42-24-19, Vernon R. Daily, three sites and three units, was changed to three parcels to conform ~dth recorded data, now being Assess- ments Nos. 42-24-19, 42-24-20 and 42-24-21, each consisting of one site and one unit. Assessment No. 42-25-1, La~Tence J. Gomez; sewer line is being extended to provide a higher degree of service. Assessment No. 42-24-1, Lorenzo J. Marek; the acreage indicated is being changed from 2.7 to 2.0. Assessment No. 42-13-4, William D. Lewis; the acreage indicated is being changed from 3.9 to 3.2. Resolution No. 1370, a Resolution Overruling Protests on Resolution of Intention No. 1358, was read. On motion of Director Gibbs, seconded by Director Roemer, and unanimously carried, said Resolution was adopted. Resolution No. 1371, A Resolution Ordering Reduction of Assessments, was read. On motion of Director Gi~bs, seconded by Director Fisher, and unanimously carried, said Resolution was adopted. Resolution No. 1372, A Resolution and Order Adopting Engineer's Report, Confirming the Assessment and Ordering the 1vork and Acquisitions, was read. On motion od Director Roemer, seconded by Director Gibbs, and unanimously carried, SAid Re~.,lution "ms cd"'9ted. 06 10 63 .of ... r' ~ " \} Resolution No. 1373, A Resolution of Award of Contract, was read. On motion of Director Fisher, seconded by Director Roemer, and unanimously carried, said Resolution was adopted. Resolution No. 1374, A Resolution Designating Collection Officer, was read. On motion of Director Roemer, seconded by Director Fisher, and unanimously carried, said Resolution was adopted. v. ADJ OURTlJ1.1ENT At 8:40 o'clock P.H., the meeting was adjourned by President Hitchell to J~~e 20,1963. ÄLL)2~~'¡¿1 President/Of the District Board of the Central Contra Costa Sanita~r District of Contra Costa County, State of California COUNTERS IGNED: -7 ,...-¿ -5:T. > Y.-?=,,-. ecre~ry of the District oard of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District of Contra Costa County, State of California 06 10 63