Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBOARD MINUTES 02-05-59 52 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEBl'ING OF THE DISTRICT BOARD CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DIS'IRICT HELD FEBRUARY 5, 1959 The District Board of Central Contra Costa Sanitary District convened in a Regular Session at its regular place of meeting located at 1250 Spring- brook Road, Walnut Creek, County of Contra Costa, State of California, on February 5, 1959, at 7:45 o'clock P.M. The meeting was called to order by President Fisher. ~ I. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Members: Mitchell, Salfingere, Spiegl and Fisher ABSENT: Member: Roemer II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Member Mitchell, seconded by Member Salfingere, that the Minutes of the meeting of January 22, 1959, be approved subject to adding to the statement of Member Mitchell, under V. OLD BUSINESS, SEWER USE CHARGE, the following: "Proposal does not consider the disproportionate share of capital con- tributions of present users. "The existence of sewers keeps the soil in a condition to allow the continued use of some septic tanks." Motion amending Minutes carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Members: Members: Member: Mitchell, Salfingere, Spiegl and Fisher None Roemer ~ Member Roemer arrived at 7:52 o'clock P.M. III. APPROVAL OF BILLS It was moved by Member Mitchell, seconded by Member Salfingere, that the bills as audited by the Auditing Committee ~nd as submitted by the District Manager-Engineer be approved, reference being specifically made to Sewer Construction Vouchers Numbers 289 to 311, inclusive, and Running Expense Vouchers Numbers 2850 to 3006, inclusive, subject to correcting the overpayment of salary on Voucher No. 2873. Carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Members: Members: Members: Mitchell, Roemer, Salfingere, Spiegl and Fisher None None IV. HEARINGS LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 24 ASSESSMÈNTS President Fisher opened the Hearing on Local Improvement District No. 24 Assessments and stated that the Board would review the written protests, after which they would hear oral protests. ~ President Fisher asked Mr. Horstkotte, Engineer for Local Improvement District No. 24, to explain to the audience the Assessment District procedures and the method of payment. Mr. Horstkotte explained that proceedings commenced upon the receipt of a Certificate of Necessity from the County Health Officer, following which came the preparation of plans and specifications for the Assessment District and the Hearing on the Resolution of Intention to do the work. lIe explained the method of assessing the individual properties, and the manner in which payments are to be made. 02 05 59 53. President Fisher called for the reading of letters of protest, which wre a. followl Aaaes...nt Ro. 24-23-2. WiD.terton Letter, prote.tiDg a..e..llent allO1lnt aDd lW ted .enice, wa. read. ~ . Mr. Boratkotte stated tbat the sewer had been broulht along Walnut Blvd. 15 feet beyond the Winterton property line. Be explained that one unit of aasea..ent had been asseaaed for direct aerviceaad partial units for the re.ainder of the property. , J Mr. and Mra. Winterton stated that the area which received the full nit of aa.eaa.ent wa. nót a buildable area. Mellber ltoe.er stated that the a.aes..nt of two units for five acres appeared to be a conservative a.aea....t. Me.ber Mitchell augleated a review ia tlte field by the Board. After diacua.ioa, it waa 80~ by M..ber Roe.er, .econded by Mellber SalfiDgere, that the WintedoB protest OB Asaea..nt No. :24-23-2 be denied. Carried by the followiDs vote: ..: AYBS: Meabera: RoeHr, Salfiagere. Spie, 1 aad Pisher NOBS: Me.ber: Mitchell ABSBNT: Me.Hra: None As.eas.eat No. 24-5-4. Batedin Letter, at.tiDg that the property had been coDDected to another Local ¡.proveaeat Diatric:t line ia 1958 aDd tile toeal I.prove.eat District a..e... Mnt had been paid, wa. read. r t I Mr. Boratkotte atattKf that thi. was a valid proteat.: It was 8Ovedby Me.ber Spiell, seconded by Mellber Roeaer, that the Baterlin protest on Aaaeaa...t No. 24-5-4 be allowed.-d the- one unit of aa.es.aent be reduced to zero. Carried by the followiDs vote: AlES: Me.Hra: Mitchell, RoeMr, lalfiagere, Ipie,l and Piaher NOBS: Me.lter.: None ABSDT: Mellber.: Noae M_ber Spiell _"eated that the unit a..e...nt of $438.00 paid for coDDectioD to Local I.prove.ent District No.8 be contributed to Local I.proveMDt Di.trict Mo. 24. ..- After dia.a.ion, it ..a 8Oved by Mnber Spie,l, seconded by Me.ber Mitchell,that $438.00 paid ¡,y Mr. Bater!i.a for coDDectiq to Local I.prove.eat Diatrict No.8 be a coatributioD to Local Illprovea8llt District No. 24. Carried by ,the follow:l.al vote: AYES: MeaMra: Mitchell, Ro_er, Salfi.,ere aDd Sptell NOBS : Mellbe rs : "Pt8I1e r ASSRn': ..bera: Noae AI.e...at No. 24-10-2. Cu88iaaa ,.., Letter, prote.tiaJ the eulllliDga' a..ea._at in relation to" other aa.eaa.eats in their vicinity, ... read. , ; The a..e....at. referred to were No. 24-10-3, No. 24-9-1, aDd No. 24-13-6. After review by Mr. Borattotte uad discus.ion, the protest waa con- tinued to the nut .eeting in order that tile Board Mellbera can review it in the field. .useaa...t No. 14-12-1. Murdock Letter, prote.tiBJ the work, was read. Mr. Murdock stated that the work wa. DOW collpleted and wi thelrew hi. protest. 0205 59 . , 54 It was aoved by Me.ber Roner, seconded by MeilberMitchell, that the protest of Mr. Murdock, Asses_nt No. 24-12-1, be denied. Ca1!ried by the following vote: - , AYBS: Meabers: Mitchell, Roeaer, SalfiDgere, Spiegl and Pisher NOBS: Meabera: None ABSENT: Meabera: None Asseasaent No. 24-13-4. Ma4ay Letter, stating that the accoapanying letter fra the Planning Coaaiaaion stated the ZODing would not allow division of the property into t.o sites as a.aesaed, waa read. -~ Mr. Horstltotte stated this was a valid protest. It ... 8Oved by Mellber Mitchell, aeconded by Meaber SalfiDiere, that the protest of Nr. Maday, Aaaesa_Dt No. 24-13-4, be allowed and thè assess.nt be reduced froa two units to one unit. Carried by tile following vote: , AYES: Me8bera: Mitchell, Roe.er, Salfilllere, Spiegl and Pisher NOBS : Meabe ra : None ABSENT: Meabers: None Asses8aent No. 24-17-2. Hill Letter, protesting ODe unit of aa.essllent,..a read. After an explanation by Mr. Horatkotte, it was 8)ved by Meaber Roeaer, seconded by Me..r Salfilllere, that the protest of Mr. B. S. Hill, Assess- a.nt No. 24-17-2, be denied. Carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT : Meabera: M~tchell, Roeaer, Salfinaere, Spiell and Pisher Meabera: None Meabera: None AsaesS8ent No. 24-17-4. Iarie --..J Letter, protestin¡ one unit of asseasaent, waa read. After an explanatioD by Mr. Horstkotte, it was aoved. by Meaber - Roe.er, seconded by Naber Salfingere, that the protest of Mr. Iarie, Assessaent No. 24-17-4, be denied. Carried by the followilll vote: AYES: Mabera: Mitchell, Roeller, Salfingere, Spiegl and Fisher NOBS: Meabera: None ABSarr: Meabers: NoDe Msessaeat No. 24-17-9. Stoddard-Sayers Letter, protesting the DoUBt of the as.es...nt, was read. After an explanation by Mr. Hor.tkotte, it ..s IIOved. by Meaber Roeaer, seconded by Meabar Mitchell, that the protest of Stoddard~Sa,era, Assesa- aent No. 24-17-9, be denied. Carried by the following vote: AYES: Meabora: Mitchell, RoeHr, 'alfingere and. Fisher NOBS: Meabers: None ABSTAINING: Meaber: Spiell ABSENT: Meabers: None Asses.aent No. 24-17-10. Baritell u Letter, protesting aore than one unit of a..e...ent because of entrance road not bein¡ in co.pliance with the County Minor Developaents Ordinance, the .ewer not beinl in.talled throulhout the length of the ea.e- aent (a condition in the Iranting of the ea.eaent), and claiain¡ daaale to two walnut trees, was read. Mr. Borstkotte stated that the sub-standard road had been checked with the Planning Coaai.sion ~o stated that perala.ion to divide the Baritell property UDder the Minor Developaent Ordinance would be granted in this case. 02 05 59 5511 . It ... aplailleel that the ea...ent 08 tile Badtell propert, waa . changed fro. the løcatioR orilillall, plaaned at the request of Dr. Baritell to better .erve portions of hi. propert, to which he wi.bed to provide .ewer .ervice. It... .tated that the change we. ade when Dr. Baritell agreed to, ,raat the ea.e..nt without coat to the Aa.es...nt. District. Dr. Saritell per.onall, protested ao1'e thaa one unit of as.esa...t because of the Doa-confor.b, road e.trance. '1 After di.cu.aion, Mr. Dorsttotte... directed to obtain a letter fro. the Count, .Plaaias Co_issioa relatift to the private road .erving the propert, aDd ~ta .ae for additio.al buildi., site. on the: Baritell propert,. I . J It was a."8sted to Mr. Plat, representative of Willia. B. Schallock, Inc., Contractor. for the wort, tat the, obtain a letter fro. their ill8uraace carrier atatin, the, will recolni8e the clai. and probable loa. of Dr. 'Baritel1 for con.ideration of tbe Diatrict Board at the Gat. .eti., .. Pebruar, 19, 1959. . Continued to Pebruar, 19,1959. Asse.s...ts No. 24-18-4. Clart; No. 24-19-9. Hubbard; Ho. 24-19-10, Brender; No. 24-19-7. Jolll1aoR Letter, protesting the coDCtitioD of Vallecito Lae, was read. Mr. Borsttotte reported that ..llecito Laae was a rock road 8hd:that, since the letter of protest we. received, the road had received additional rock. and we. now in a. lood a coaditioR a. it waa prior to the work; he reco88eDded that the protest be denied. NoDe of the prote.tant. ..a pre.eDt. Mr.:id Mord., who was preaeDt aDd uses Vallecito Lane, stated it we. in the be.t condition, he he. .eea it in.. ,., It we. aoved b, Me.ber Sp4..1, .econded b, Me.ber Itoe.er, that the protest of Mr~ Clark~As.e.._t No. 24-18-4, Mr. Bubbard, Asse.a.nt.. No. 24-19-9, Mr. .read.r, As....eat No. 24-19-10, and Mr. Johnaon, As..s._tHo. 24-19-7, be deRied a. to Val1ecUo Laae. Carried b, thefol10wia¡ vote, I ) AYES, Meabera, Mitchell, ltoeMr, Salfingere, Spie,l aDd Pi.her NOES, Meabera, MoDe ABSJIIT, Me.bera: NoDe Asse...eat Mo. 24-19-9. Hubbard Mr. Morris .tated that he was repre.entin, Jlr. Hubbard, who could not aUead the .eetine, aad .aid tbat Jlr. Hubbard wa. proteatina the conditioa of the road fro. Vallecito Lane to his ho.e. . Mr. Doratkotte, Balin-I' for Local I.prove.ent Diatrict No. 24, we. instructed to check and have the contractor re.tore.the cORditioD of the road if the protest we. a valid ORe. Coatinued to Pebruar, 19,1959. l Assesa.eDt No. 24-18-7. KaRlaS Letter, prote.tial the higb co.t of a r8cent .eptic tank in.tallatioD and requeatin, recouideration of o.e uait of a..e.....t oa the propert" was read. It wa. 8ved.." Meaber Salfiaaere, seconded b, Me.ber Spiel1, that the prote.t of Mr. Kula., u.e.._tHo. 24-18-7, be deaied. Carded b, the followia¡ vote, AYBSI Meaber., Mitchell, Roe.r, Salfiqere, Sp4e,1.aad Piaher NOlIS: """ra: NODe ABSENT I Me.bera: None As.e.....t No. 24-19-13. Granzotto tetter, prote.tiag the aa..a88ent and atatiDI that .ervice is avail- able iIIto a liDe ia8talled b, aaother As.ea....t Diatrict, wa. read. 02 05 59 56 Mr. Horattotte explaiaed that the larger portion of the pmperty would haye to cODBect into Local Improve.nt District No. 24. It was suggesteet that the property be reviewed for couideration of a large~ as.essaeat. It was lIOyed by Mea1aer Mitchell, seconded by M_ber Spiegl, that the protest of Mr. GraDzotto, Aaseasaeat No. 24-19-13, be d_ied. Pailed to carry by the following vote: AYBS : Meabers : NOBS: Meahers: ABSENT: Membe ra : Mitchell and Spiegl Roeaer, Salfingere aDd Pi&her None ~ Continued to Jlebruary 19, 1959, for furtber consid.ration. Ass..saent No. 24-23-3. Ma.soae Letter, protesting the assesa8ent due to the tenaination of the 8ewer at a point which would cause relocation of hoU8e pl.abing and also pro- testias clean-up and coatractor's not having disced the property a8 pro- mised, was read. . . After discussion, it was IROved by Meaber Roeaer, 8ecollded by Meaber Salfingere, that the protest of Mr. Mas80ne, Asses_at No. 24-23-3, be denied as to the aS8essaent aDd continued to Pebruary 19,1959, as to the wort. Carried by the following vote: ADS: . NOES: ABSENT: Meaber8: Mitchell, Roeller, Salfinlere, Spiell and Jli8ber MeaHr8: None Meabers: None Assessaeat No. 24-23-8. Vinther Letter, protesting one unit of assessment for what she coDSidered to be indirect service, was read. After discussion, it was I1Oved by Meilber Mitchell, 8econded by Member. Spiell, that the protest of Mrs. Vinthe r, Assessaent No. - 24-23-8, . be allowed and the assessment be reduced from one unit to one-quarter unit. Carried by the following vote: . ~ AYES: Members: Mitchell, Roemer, Salfingere, Spiell and Pisher NOES: Members: None ABSENT: M8ber8: Noae Assessllent No. 24-23-5. Blake Letter was presented which reported the sale of. portion of the property and requested a division. . Mr. Horstkotte stated that there would be no change in the total assessment for the pmperty. Assessment No. 24-23-7. Bartlett Letter was presented which: reported the sale of sixty feet of the pmperty and appealed for a reduction in the aaaeaament. After an explanation froa Mr. Borstkotte, it was IROved by Meaber Roemer, seconded by Meaher Salfingere, that the protest of Mr. Bartlett, Asseasaat No. 24-23-7, be denied. Carried by the following vote: L AYES: Meahers: Mitchell, Roemer, Salfiagere, Spiegl and Piaher NOBS: Members: None ABSENT: Members: None Assesament No. 24-23-9. Baahall Letter was presented which reported the sale of a portioa of tlae property. '.. Mr. Rorstkotte stated there would be no change in the total asaess- Bent for the property. 02 05 59 ;?' President Pisher stated that this concluded the written protests . and asked for oral protests, which were as follo..: As.ea..ent No. 24-13-5. McIntosh Mr. McIntosh requested that his asses.lient be re~iewed because of what he considered to be an unbuildable area. Mr. McIntosh wa. inforaed that it wuld be reviewed uader the Cu_in,. 1ettèr of protèst, Assesslient No. 24-16-2, which referred to his property. ,., I . J Assessaeat No. 24-18-1. Goodaul1dson Mr. Good8uDdson protested his asses.aent aDd referred to Assesaaent Parcel No. 24-18-2 as a coaapariaon. Be also stated the prope rty was on an uniapro~ed road which he felt would not .be iIIpro~ed fo:r a few years. . . . . After an explanation of the aases.lient by Mr. Horstk;otte and <us- cus.ion relarding the road, it..s ao~ed by Me.bar Mitchell, seconded by Meaber Roeaer, that the protest of Mr. GoQ4aundson, Asaes.ent No. 24-18-1, be denied. Carried by the followinl vote: AYES: Me.Hrs. Mitchell, Itoeaer, Salfqere, Spie,l and Pisher NOBS. Me.Mrl: None . ABSBNT: MeRbers I None As.e.s.at No. 34-23-4. Stephens Mr. Stephen. stated that sewer .er~ice_wa. .a~ailable to hi. property at Mountain Vi.w Dri~. fro. another As.e.s.ent District. r It ... explained to Mr. Stephens that it would have beea a~ai1able but would have required a Hin line extension. This line has now been extended alolll with the work inLoc~l I.pro~e.ent District 110. 24. It ..s ao~ed by Member Mitchell, seconded by Me.bar Spiell, that the .. protest of Mr. Stephens, Assessaænt No. 24-23-4, be denied. Carried by the following ~ote I . ¡ ) AYES: lleabers: Jlitchell, RoeHr, SalfiDIere, Spieel and Pi8her NOBS : Mellbe rs : None ABSJIIT: Meabers: None Assea...tNo. 34-20-6. Arakelian Mr. Arakelian protested his a..e_..nt, statiBg that his property wa. being used as pasture land. , After an explanation, it.was IIOved by Meaher Salfingere, seconded by Meaber Mitchell, that the protest of Mr. Arakelia., Asse._eat No. 24-20-6, be denied. Carried by the followinl vote: AYES: Me111Mtrs: Mitchell, Roser, SalfiDIere, Spie, 1 and Piaher NOBS: Me8bers: None ABSBn': IIe.Hrs: None Asses8ileat No. 24-16~6. Dellrate. ! Mr. DePrate. coaplåined about the loose Ira~el on the road in front of hi. home. It ws explained to hia that this lIOåld clear up a. the Ira~el worked into the road or when the County r_o~el it, as they do fro. ti.e to t18e. ....s...t No. 3<4-22-6. btchin. Mr. :&:utch1ns asked how .any units were assessed aeBinst his pmpe.rty. Mr. IIorstkotte stated there were two and one-quarter units and ex- plained. "8..s...tNo. 24-11-6. Strand Mr. Strand reported that the contractor had used his driveway and the concrete portio. was cracked. 0205 59 ---- ------.-.-..-- .-.-----.--------.------------ 58 Mr. Plant, representing Wi Ilia. H. Schallock, Inc., the Contractor, stated that they had inspected the driveway prior to using it and it was cracked at that time. Mr. atr...; *üd: .a8it he had Dot lived there long and it Bay have been. Mr. Horstkotte was instructed to investigate. ContiDued to February 19, 1959. There being no further protests, it was aoved by Member Salfingere, seconded by Member Spiegl, that the Bearing for Local ¡.proveMnt District No. 24 a.ses.aents be closed as to protests and continued to February 19, 1959, Carried by the following vote: ......... AYES: Meabers: Mitchell, Ro_er, Salfingere, Spiegl and Fisher NOBS: Me.ber.: Nolle ABSENT: Meabe rs : Holle V. OLD BUSINBSS PROTEST Op COUBJE PAn RESIDENTS RB LOCATICIf OP SEWER RR WATERSHED 24 Mr. Horstkotte, District Manager-Bagineer, reported :that after a field investigation he felt that the location wa. the best froB an engineering aad cost standpoint. Mr. Decker suggested another route on an easement on the Hackaeier property and into Baylor Drive. Mr. Horstkotte pointed out the disadvantages of this route. Mr. Decker ståted that the School officials had agreed to Beet with the College Part property o..ers on February 10,1959, at a School Board aaeeting to discuss the problea and asked that no action be taken by the Sanitary District until after that tiRe He reque.ted that a represlllltative of the District be present at this a.etilll. Members of the Board informed the College Park property owners that the District had advised the School District of the best :location as :to . engineering and cost, without reco_endation. '-..J It wa. IaOved by Meaber Spiegl that the School District be inforaed that the District had presented the 8O8t econoaiesl plan but expressing . no opinion that it is the proper location, everything considered, and that the District would Dot take upon itself the acquiriDg of easeaeat., which would be the problea of the School District. Motion failed to carry for lack of a second. Continued to February 19, 1959. REPORT RtOI BROWN AND CALDWELL RB aJ'1'PALL LDfB Member Mitchell stated that he would like to see a report on the pipe support situation for Schedule III of the Outfall Line uDder a load. VI. NEW BUSINESS ACCBPTANCBOPBASBMBNTS It was IIOved by Member Mitchell, seconded by Member Roemer, that easeBentsfrom GUles M. Corcos, United Towing Co., Adolph Markatein, Jack L. Choice, DB!l J. Gbigl!one, aDd Dablia C. Bruzzone be accepted and their recording ordered. Carried by the followinc vote: I ~ AYES: Members: Mitchell, Roe.er, Salfingere, Spiegl and Pisher NOES: Members: NoDe ABSENT: Members: None AIJ'11DIZATI<JII FOR PRESIDENT TO SIGH AGRB.BMENT WI'DI STATE OP CALIPORIfIA. AND CXIfTRA COSTA cœNTY PLOOD CarraOL AND WATER CCtfSERVATJ:<Jf DIS'l'RICT . Mr. Horstkotte, District Manager-Bogineer, explained the agreement which provides for the use of rights of way for the iDStallation of Line A. p2 05 59 ~ ! , J r. ; ¡ I ,.., 59 RBSOWT1œ NO. 1150 . ~ 'DD PRBSIDBIT TO .BIIDJT.B mE AGItIŒ- MJIIT WIl1I '1'BB STATE 011 CALIPCltNIA AMDTHB 0Ctf1'ItA COSTA cœNTY PLOOD CCIft'ROL..A!!P WATJIR <:qLSJDtVATI~ DIS'l'RICT roa un 011 1'1ŒIR RIGH'l'S 011 WAY PeR LINE A ' . . . , It ..s IIOved by Me.ber Mitchell, seconded by Meaber Sslfiqere, that Re8ðlution Mo. 1150 be adopted. Carded by the following yote& AYES,. MeaHrs, Mitchell, Roe.er, SalfiDgere, Spiegl and lIisher NOES & WeaHra. Mone ABSENT. Mellbera: NOlIe AIrl'IDI~ STA'1'B OP QALIPORNIA Pat RIGHT. Of WAY POR LDŒ 1t-3b IN 'l1IB SUM 011 3.950.83 It ,waa IIOved by Me.ber Spiegl, seconded by Meaber Salfi..,ere, that Sewer CoBltruction Bond Punda in the a.ount of $3,950.83 be authadr;ed for paya8Dt to the State of Califomia for rigltt of way for LiDe Jt:-3b. Carried by the followiD¡ vote: AYES: Meabera: Mitchell, Roe.er, SalfiDgere, Spiegl aDd fisher NDES& Meabera& None ABSENT: Me.bers: None VI I . REPORTS OIS'fttICT MANAGBR-mtGIN.BJIt AGIŒBMBNT WI'l'B UTAH oœS'ØUCTION CO. AND BOIfD SALE Mr. Ror8tkotte, Di8trict Mualer-Engineer, stated that he would like to start negotiatq with the Utah Construction Co. for rights of way in the MorBIa area aDd to proceed with a bond aale ~ich would provide for Line A, L1ae p', a portion. of Lilae 0, LiDe J, and the OriDc1a¡' and Moraga PuapiDs Stations iD a total aua of .$3,000,000 to $3,500,000. He stated that an alree..t ia to be lIOrked oat with the Utah Conat nction Co. to pay the interest oa tlte bonds sold for advanced Morala lIOrk aaUl: the ti.e the lIOrk is scheduled in the Brown and Caldwell report. After diacuaaiOll, the utter waa contiDaed to the _xt. aeetiag at which t18e aD alreeaent with Utah Con8truction Co. ia to be preaented~ OPIN IDfU AT 'l'UA'1'M1Ift' PLAIft' Mr. Børatkotte, Diatrict MaDager-lI1,iDeer, laforaed thè Board Me.bers that invitations were beiDg snt out for ope. hoaae at the Treataent Plant on lIebruary 10, 1959, sponsored by Brow .sad Caldwellmd Willi..8 . Burrows Contractora, Inc., the contractor.. T.BMPOIWtY BMPLOYJœNT Of TWO UTILITY MEN AT '.l'RJ3A1'NIIIT PLANT Mr. Boratkotte, Diatrict 'Nanaler-BD¡iDeer t requested authority to hire two Utility Mea at the Treataeat Plant on a teaporary basia for a period of six IIOntl18 at 811 hourly rate the "9Ii"al8l1t of a salary of $335.00 per IIOnth. RBSOLUTICIf NO. 1151. TBIPOItARY APPODf'DIJ:IIT OP CDC8JB P. WEISS AND ~ER. UTItI'IT MEN AT 'DIB 'l'UA'1'M1Ift' PJ..I!T. AT AN JbJ1tL Y ItATB TIIB aJIYAL81T Of A SALAltY Of Þ35.00 PER Mœ'DI It waa aoyed by Mellber Roeaer, seconded bJ' Meaber MitChell, that aesolutioa No. 1151 be adopted. Carried by the follow1Dg vote: . AYES: Meabera: Mitchell, Roeaer, SalfiDgere, Spiell aDd fisher NOES: M_hers: None ABSBlfT: JlelllMra: NoBe BASBN1IIT TO PACIPIC GAS 81 BJ..JIn1tIC COIPANY IN THB awwas RILL LI1œ It AItBA . After aD eXplanation fro. Mr. Borstkotte, it "s aoved by Me.ber Spie,l, seconded by Meaber Mitchell, that the President and Secretary be authorir;ed to execute the easeaent to the Pacific Gas. Electric eoapany in the Charles 02 05 59 ._---- ----.-----.--..----....--- 60 Bill Line ~ area. Carried by the followiq vote: AYES: Meabers. Mitchell, Ro_er, SalfiDIere, Spiell aDd Piaher NOES: Mnbers: None ABSENT: Me.hers. None BASBMBNT TO: PACIPIC TELBPIDIB . T.BI..BJaAPR CCIO'ANY IN '1HB awtLES BILL' LINE K AREA After an explanation fr08 Mr. Horstkotte, it was aoved by NelRber: Spie,l} seconded b, Me.ber Mitchell, that the President and Secretary be authorized to execute the ease.at to the Pacific Telephone. Telegraph Co.pan, in the Charles Bill Line K area. Carried b, the following wte. ~ AYES: Meabers: Mitchell, Roeaer, Salfiqere, Spiegl and Pisher NOBS : Me.be r.s. None ABSBNT: Mellberst None COONSBL Pœ 'l1IB DIS'l'RICT None. VIII. ADJaJRNMEftT At 12:30 o'clock A.M., Pebruar, 6, 1959, the aeetiDe was adjourned by - President Pisher to Pebraar, 19,1959. cœNTBRS ION BD : >-..J ~ .--..~ Secre 1." 0 the District Board of Central Contra Costa Sanitary District of Contra Costa Co~t" State of California ~ 02.0!; f'9 . ".r'